Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/21/2009 11:03:40 AM PDT by CounterCounterCulture
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: CounterCounterCulture

Gee, I am on pins and needles waiting for what lame excuse the Californian Supreme Court will use to overturn the will of the people once again. We don’t need no stinking votes or legislature for that matter....


2 posted on 05/21/2009 11:05:38 AM PDT by Always Right (Obama: more arrogant than Bill Clinton, more naive than Jimmy Carter, and more liberal than LBJ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CounterCounterCulture
Thanks for the reminder — that came up quickly.
3 posted on 05/21/2009 11:05:40 AM PDT by scripter ("You don't have a soul. You are a soul. You have a body." - C.S. Lewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


4 posted on 05/21/2009 11:06:32 AM PDT by CounterCounterCulture (I have already previewed or do not wish to preview this composition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CounterCounterCulture

The SCOC will overturn a properly approved referendum. The question remains, will the “majority” make the appropriate response by demanding their impeachment?


5 posted on 05/21/2009 11:07:03 AM PDT by Cletus.D.Yokel (FreepMail me if you want on the Bourbon ping list!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CounterCounterCulture

What sort of dirt does Perez Hilton and the Lavender Mafia have on the justices?


6 posted on 05/21/2009 11:07:13 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (If you like the Dept. of Motor Vehicles, the IRS, and the Post Office, you'll love govt Health Care)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CounterCounterCulture
The gay lobby and Moonbeam Brown (the AG) think this is an issue too important for the voters to decide. That is why the appealed Prop 8.

California is unravelling fast.

7 posted on 05/21/2009 11:07:20 AM PDT by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CounterCounterCulture

For the umpteenth friggin’ time -

Proposition 8 DOES NOT BAN ANYTHING. It simply affirms what was settled custom and law in California - and everywhere else on planet Earth since the dawn of history - that marriage is an exclusively heterosexual thang.

The liberals find some judge somewhere to uphold some wacky new “civil right” for five minutes before it’s overturned, and then that five minute right becomes set in stone for all time, and any attempt to restore the sane status quo ante becomes a “ban” or some other kind of oppression. It’s a neat, albeit blatantly obvious and dishonest, tactic.


9 posted on 05/21/2009 11:08:45 AM PDT by Argus (We've gone downtown to Clown Town, and that's where we'll be living from now on..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CounterCounterCulture

Anybody want to take any bets on what the “men in black” will rule?

I say they’re nothing less than political animals for whom the law and the California Constitution are totally irrelevant. They are weighing their re-election chances - - the votes of normal, decent, traditional American families (who haven’t yet escaped California) versus the votes and significant financial support of the goofball, hate-America, love-perversion lefties with the big mouths.

Good luck with all that, men in black.


11 posted on 05/21/2009 11:10:29 AM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CounterCounterCulture

What I don’t understand is, the CA Supremes already ruled that prop 8 could go forward. If it was not legit than why was it allowed to go on the ballot in the first place?


13 posted on 05/21/2009 11:12:51 AM PDT by HerrBlucher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CounterCounterCulture

Peons, your betters are meeting together to decide your fate.


14 posted on 05/21/2009 11:15:39 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (America's Independent Party - 'partisans only for the truth' - www.AIPNEWS.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CounterCounterCulture
the voter-approved ballot

Doesn't that say enough? The majority wants it... Isn't that how our governments are supposed to work. What the hell is going on?

20 posted on 05/21/2009 11:21:57 AM PDT by Mind Freed ("Every man has the right to be a fool 5 minutes a day. Wisdom is not exceeding the limit.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CounterCounterCulture

scary, courts are king


25 posted on 05/21/2009 11:27:36 AM PDT by yldstrk (My heros have always been cowboys--Reagan and Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CounterCounterCulture

We believe that allowing people to vote is unConstitutional....


31 posted on 05/21/2009 11:43:26 AM PDT by Tzimisce (http://groups.myspace.com/nailthemessiah)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CounterCounterCulture

Well at least Califorians GOT a chance to vote on this......TWICE! That’s something that those of us in the People’s Republic of Massachusetts NEVER got!(otherwise,we would have tossed out gay “marriage”,too).


38 posted on 05/21/2009 12:15:52 PM PDT by massmike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CounterCounterCulture

California’s state constitution is REALLY broken. It needs to be completely re-written. Maybe someone can explain to me how the state supreme court can get involved in an amendment to the constitution. I can see how they can overturn a law, but not a constitutional amendment. Only federal court should have jurisdiction. My understanding of the US constitution is that this is one of the checks and balances. Amending the constitution allows the states to super-cede the Supreme Court and they cannot overturn it. They are sworn to uphold it— even if they disagree.

hh


39 posted on 05/21/2009 12:22:57 PM PDT by hoosier hick ((I'm back to..) Note to RINOs: We need a choice, not an echo. (Barry Goldwater))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CounterCounterCulture

Even if it is upheld by the state supreme court, the pro gays are gathering signatures to put this on the ballot in 2010. That battle will even be uglier than the fight for prop 8.

They are relentless and little by little they will get there way as oppostion to gay marriage decreases as more young people get older and vote.


40 posted on 05/21/2009 12:38:09 PM PDT by skyman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CounterCounterCulture

The people of Kalifornia have spoken clearly on this subject many times!

If they want equal rights, that’s fine! They cannot be married because that is a holy ceremony reserved for one man and one woman only!


52 posted on 05/21/2009 10:04:26 PM PDT by Randy Larsen ( BTW, If I offend you! Please let me know, I may want to offend you again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

UPDATE:

The ruling will be announced next Tuesdsay, May 26, 10am PDT.

Prop. 8 ruling coming Tuesday

53 posted on 05/22/2009 11:56:29 AM PDT by CounterCounterCulture (RECALL Abel Maldonado; DEPORT Arnold Schwarzenegger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson