Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This will unfortunately be a temporary victory...
1 posted on 05/20/2009 12:39:56 PM PDT by Pyro7480
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
To: Pyro7480
LIBS: "Quick, get a judge..."
2 posted on 05/20/2009 12:44:43 PM PDT by frogjerk (C-NJ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Siobhan; Canticle_of_Deborah; NYer; Salvation; american colleen; Desdemona; StAthanasiustheGreat; ..

Catholic ping!


3 posted on 05/20/2009 12:46:20 PM PDT by Pyro7480 ("If you know how not to pray, take Joseph as your master, and you will not go astray." - St. Teresa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pyro7480

You net it will be only temporary, especially given as many homosexuals that appear during the summer around Portsmouth, etc. and right across the line into Maine...


4 posted on 05/20/2009 12:54:39 PM PDT by cranked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pyro7480

Will the New Hampshire state reps now be charged with a hate crime?


8 posted on 05/20/2009 1:11:11 PM PDT by massmike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pyro7480

What’s with calling this the “gay-marriage” bill? There is nothing gay about this lifestyle. If they are going to call this disgusting piece of legislation anything, it should be called “homosexual-marriage” bill or even better yet, “sodomite-marriage” bill.


11 posted on 05/20/2009 1:36:26 PM PDT by itsinthebag (E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pyro7480
Homosexuals want the title “marriage” so they can declare moral equivalency. Something “civil union” doesn't do.
14 posted on 05/20/2009 2:05:01 PM PDT by Ben Mugged (The opposite of love is not hate, it is indifference.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pyro7480

Nice work Gov. Lynch! The old poison pill. Way to go.


18 posted on 05/20/2009 2:15:12 PM PDT by Deb (Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pyro7480

New Hampshire lawmakers unexpectedly rejected a bill on Wednesday that would have made the state the sixth in the United States to authorize gay marriage.
_____________________________________________

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

NH doesnt want MASS taxes...

Or the MASS “social reforms”...


19 posted on 05/20/2009 2:15:29 PM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pyro7480

Let’s have hope, I have hope, that this will stand. Hope like wishing on a star, probably, but if some of the reps hold and don’t compromise, and the opposition can filibuster or do some procedural moves, maybe. . .maybe. . .


20 posted on 05/20/2009 2:22:21 PM PDT by BlueStateBlues (Blue State business, Red State heart. . . . .Palin 2012----can't come soon enough!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pyro7480

YEAH! (I like NH, and campaigned there in 2006, espeically yeah for my evangelical friends there ;)!!!


21 posted on 05/20/2009 2:26:10 PM PDT by JSDude1 (DHS, FBI, FEMA, etc have been bad little boys. They need to be spanked and sent to timeout!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pyro7480

What the hell is going on in NH?

I lived there for a few years in the early 90’s.


23 posted on 05/20/2009 2:38:46 PM PDT by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pyro7480

WOO HOO!!! This gives the new FReeper group time to fight the issue before it comes back. Do not despair...we will be victorious in NH!


26 posted on 05/20/2009 2:56:00 PM PDT by FreepShop1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pyro7480

A temporary victory but a more permanent one can be achieved. New Hampshire and Maine can be turned back. It is very hard to reverse Vermont and CT though from polling data even in Vermont Gay marriage wouldn’t be a given if the vote was put to the people.


27 posted on 05/20/2009 2:59:56 PM PDT by Maelstorm (Those that have nothing to hide welcome debate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pyro7480
"language that would give religious institutions opposed to gay marriage legal protections"

not neccesary. Already taken care of.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof
28 posted on 05/20/2009 3:18:50 PM PDT by chuck_the_tv_out (click my name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pyro7480

So the dems voted it down because of the added wording?
And what’s up with such a small state like NH (pop. 1.3 Million) having 376+ reps in the house?
Oregon (pop. 3.8 Million) has 60 members in the house.


30 posted on 05/20/2009 4:46:37 PM PDT by LayoutGuru2 (Know the difference between honoring diversity and honoring perversity? No? You must be a liberal!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pyro7480
The Democrat-controlled House of Representatives voted down the bill in a 188-186 vote

Wait a minute, you are telling me that NH has 376 members of their HofR?????

35 posted on 05/20/2009 5:59:03 PM PDT by RetiredArmy (Right wing military retiree. Proudly on DHLS hit list!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pyro7480

Government should not be in the marriage business. Leave it to religious institutions and contracts by the local courts. I doubt anyone cares who chooses whatever living arrangements they want. If the government allows no fault divorce, then protecting the sanctity of marriage is not what they care about.


36 posted on 05/20/2009 6:05:11 PM PDT by Birch T. Barlow (Go Mariners! Certain 2009 AL West champions!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pyro7480
Homosexuality from a crime against nature to a mental disease to the chic wave of the present. Where are the brave, and eloquent conservative voices to point out the evil in celebrating perversion?
42 posted on 05/20/2009 8:00:47 PM PDT by Betty Jane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pyro7480

I know that the Dems put “gay rights” on their party platform one year. Does anyone remember which year it was? Also, didn’t Pat Buchanan criticize this as part of a culture war? This was a long time ago and I am a little fuzzy as to what happened when.


54 posted on 05/21/2009 5:56:32 PM PDT by cradle of freedom (Long live the Republic !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pyro7480

Gay marriage in New Hampshire. Gives a whole new meaning to the word Masshole.


58 posted on 05/25/2009 2:34:11 PM PDT by VeniVidiVici (Putin warned Obama not to pursue Marxism. Obama has ignored him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson