Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Hampshire lawmakers reject gay-marriage bill (in State House)
Reuters ^ | 5/20/200 | n/a

Posted on 05/20/2009 12:39:55 PM PDT by Pyro7480

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 next last
To: Pyro7480

YEAH! (I like NH, and campaigned there in 2006, espeically yeah for my evangelical friends there ;)!!!


21 posted on 05/20/2009 2:26:10 PM PDT by JSDude1 (DHS, FBI, FEMA, etc have been bad little boys. They need to be spanked and sent to timeout!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

Yep, you understand it correctly. Nope, you’re not missing anything.


22 posted on 05/20/2009 2:33:23 PM PDT by greatplains
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480

What the hell is going on in NH?

I lived there for a few years in the early 90’s.


23 posted on 05/20/2009 2:38:46 PM PDT by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ben Mugged

They will never be equal!!! I think we who are married should then counter by saying we would like to change our status to Covenant relationship anything.....I wrote the Govenor and said how can you change the meaning of marriage when I am already in this contract? I do not want to be in the same type of contract as a homosexual couple. Where is my protection? I have had this contract (lawfully wedded) since 1990?


24 posted on 05/20/2009 2:40:15 PM PDT by Texas4ever (God is Good!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: angkor

People are leaving Mass in a Mass Exodus....welcome to New Masshire....something like that......now that Mass just passed nes taxation on the beautiful people.....We will definately gain more ....exodus fallout from Mass....oye boy.....


25 posted on 05/20/2009 2:42:14 PM PDT by Texas4ever (God is Good!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480

WOO HOO!!! This gives the new FReeper group time to fight the issue before it comes back. Do not despair...we will be victorious in NH!


26 posted on 05/20/2009 2:56:00 PM PDT by FreepShop1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480

A temporary victory but a more permanent one can be achieved. New Hampshire and Maine can be turned back. It is very hard to reverse Vermont and CT though from polling data even in Vermont Gay marriage wouldn’t be a given if the vote was put to the people.


27 posted on 05/20/2009 2:59:56 PM PDT by Maelstorm (Those that have nothing to hide welcome debate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480
"language that would give religious institutions opposed to gay marriage legal protections"

not neccesary. Already taken care of.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof
28 posted on 05/20/2009 3:18:50 PM PDT by chuck_the_tv_out (click my name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

According to the article, you are correct.


29 posted on 05/20/2009 4:24:09 PM PDT by PatriotGirl827 (Pray for the United States of America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480

So the dems voted it down because of the added wording?
And what’s up with such a small state like NH (pop. 1.3 Million) having 376+ reps in the house?
Oregon (pop. 3.8 Million) has 60 members in the house.


30 posted on 05/20/2009 4:46:37 PM PDT by LayoutGuru2 (Know the difference between honoring diversity and honoring perversity? No? You must be a liberal!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

Very troubling possibility:

Opponents of pseudogamy vote against both bills.

Radical proponents of pseudogamy only vote against the bill with religious freedom protections.

The governor then bows to pressure to sign the original bill without the protections.

So sane people take the principled stand but end up with the worst outcome.


31 posted on 05/20/2009 5:09:43 PM PDT by Dumb_Ox (http://kevinjjones.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego
You're not missing anything. You read this correctly - and so should every thinking New Hampshirite with a vote. This formerly veiled agenda is now out in the open for the world to see. Isn't it pretty? /sarc
32 posted on 05/20/2009 5:25:48 PM PDT by fwdude ("...a 'centrist' ... has few principles - and those are negotiable." - Don Feder)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: LayoutGuru2
And what’s up with such a small state like NH (pop. 1.3 Million) having 376+ reps in the house?

We have the third largest deliberative body in the English-speaking world, and that's just how we like it. Our representatives are carpenters, doormen, housewives, retirees, and millionaires. We run into them at the grocery store and talk politics over the corn pops, and pay them exactly the salary they deserve - $150 a year.

Please note, everyone - the conservatives in the House took this procedural opportunity to kill the bill. Most Democrats voted in favor of it because they wanted to get it in front of Lynch, the Governor. This was not a case of pique from culture warriors who didn't get every last scrap of what they wanted, but a narrowly-achieved defeat of a complete upending of the institution of government marriage in New Hampshire.

33 posted on 05/20/2009 5:26:50 PM PDT by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego
This should send a shudder down all of us if I understand this correctly. Unless I missed something, it sounds like they are against giving a religious exclusion in the cases of same-sex marriage.

No - the opportunity for a "religious exclusion" amendment to satisfy a flip-flopping Governor brought the bill back within range of artillery one last time, and it was narrowly clipped on the left wing and spiraled down into the sea.

34 posted on 05/20/2009 5:29:21 PM PDT by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480
The Democrat-controlled House of Representatives voted down the bill in a 188-186 vote

Wait a minute, you are telling me that NH has 376 members of their HofR?????

35 posted on 05/20/2009 5:59:03 PM PDT by RetiredArmy (Right wing military retiree. Proudly on DHLS hit list!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480

Government should not be in the marriage business. Leave it to religious institutions and contracts by the local courts. I doubt anyone cares who chooses whatever living arrangements they want. If the government allows no fault divorce, then protecting the sanctity of marriage is not what they care about.


36 posted on 05/20/2009 6:05:11 PM PDT by Birch T. Barlow (Go Mariners! Certain 2009 AL West champions!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Birch T. Barlow; Pyro7480; 185JHP; AFA-Michigan; Abathar; Agitate; AliVeritas; Antoninus; ...
Government should not be in the marriage business. Leave it to religious institutions and contracts by the local courts.

Courts are a part of government.

I doubt anyone cares who chooses whatever living arrangements they want.

Conservatives DO CARE, it's people like you who don't.

Homosexual Agenda Ping

Freepmail wagglebee or DirtyHarryY2K to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda ping list.

Be sure to click the FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search link for a list of all related articles. We don't ping you to all related articles so be sure to click the previous link to see the latest articles.

Add keywords homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list.

Checkout: http://SilencingChristians.com


37 posted on 05/20/2009 6:21:52 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: frogjerk

Even Governor “Do-Nothing” Lynch knows that if he signs this the ‘Rats are done in NH for the forseeable future.


38 posted on 05/20/2009 6:53:14 PM PDT by OCCASparky (Steely-Eyed Killer of the Deep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: OCCASparky
Lynch knows that if he signs this the ‘Rats are done in NH for the forseeable future.

Sign it, sign it!

39 posted on 05/20/2009 6:54:14 PM PDT by ROCKLOBSTER (RATs...nothing more than Bald Haired Hippies!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: LayoutGuru2
The NH Legislature has 400 members, the largest deliberative bodies outside the House of Commons and the House of Representatives.

That being said, they only get $100/yr. Which eliminates the "professional" or "career" politician.
40 posted on 05/20/2009 6:55:47 PM PDT by OCCASparky (Steely-Eyed Killer of the Deep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson