Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pakistan's Swat offensive leaves India sceptical
Reuters ^ | Sun May 17, 2009 3:50pm IST | By Myra MacDonald

Posted on 05/17/2009 5:23:40 AM PDT by MyTwoCopperCoins

LONDON: Pakistan's military offensive against the Taliban in the Swat valley has done nothing to allay Indian doubts about its willingness to crack down more widely on Islamist militants, analysts say.

That leaves both countries vulnerable to a flare-up of tensions still simmering after last November's attack on Mumbai which could torpedo the U.S. administration's plans for Afghanistan and Pakistan.

It also complicates U.S. efforts to coax Pakistan into moving troops from its eastern border with India to fight the Taliban on its western border with Afghanistan.

Gurmeet Kanwal at the Centre for Land Warfare Studies in New Delhi said he believed the Pakistan Army considered the Taliban, especially the Afghan Taliban, to be a strategic asset "and has no intentions whatsoever of fighting them".

"Meanwhile, the army will continue to 'stage' operations ... selectively to 'show' that serious attention is being given to fighting the war on terror," he said.

(Excerpt) Read more at in.reuters.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: india; islam; kaliyuga; pakistan; taliban
Earlier:


Pakistani Army can’t sustain gains

Saturday, May 9, 2009


Samuel Baid, The Pioneer (India).


The televised 'civil war' in Pakistan may be a lot of hot air because the Army is killing more civilians than real Taliban and in the long run Islamabad will have to suffer the consequences

Without a strong political determination to defeat the Taliban/al-Qaeda threat to the existence of Pakistan, the Pakistani Army cannot succeed on its own in its operations in the tribal areas. There is no consensus among political leaders about the seriousness of this threat. No political party, including the Pakistan People's Party (PPP) can dare campaign against the Taliban/al-Qaeda or, for that matter, against any of the banned terrorist groups like Lashkar-e-Tayyaba, Jaish-e-Mohammad and Lashkar-e-Jhangvi. On the contrary, they try to appease Taliban/al-Qaeda by howling against America's drone attacks on their hideouts or by snubbing India for showing concern for the Sikh community in the Orakzai agency. Pakistan's Foreign Minister Sham Mehmud Querishi, while condemning India's concern, did not say a word about Taliban's authority to collect jaziya from them.

Over the past 5-6 years, the Taliban has expanded their activities outside the Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA) into different parts of Pakistan - in fat all over the country - piggy riding the local terrorist or Pushtun settlers. In Balochistan, they have mixed with the people in the Pakhtun part of the Province. Here, they are trying to find out an alternative route for incursion into Afghanistan. In Sindh they are concentrating on Karachi, the nerve centre of Pakistan's economic life. Here they commit crimes like kidnapping for ransom, hijacking of cars and loot to make money which they send back to FATA for Taliban's activities. In Karachi they are hosted by Pakhtuns who otherwise swear by the Awami National Party (ANP), a secular party. Another way of making money is by threatening Christians to either accept Islam or pay jaziya. Frightened Christians have appealed to politicians but to no avail. They might end up paying this toll just as some helpless Sikhs in the Orakzai agency.

Talib incursion into Punjab is a serious threat to Pakistan's existence. Punjab is the most important province. They say you can destabilise Pakistan if you can destabilise Punjab. They have conducted suicide bombings in Rawalpindi, Islamabad, Lahore and other places. The attack on a Police Training Centre in Lahore on March 30, just 10 Km from the Wahaga border, caused a serious concern to India.

But what has caused the maximum concern worldwide is the armed Taliban's invasion of Buner district from bases in Swat where they have managed to establish their sway under pretext of the Nizam-e-Adal Regulation (Islamic justice). In the first week of April they entered Buner telling people to accept Islamic justice. They kidnapped and killed some security men and fought with locals who opposed them. A local jirga asked them to leave Buner. They refused and killed five persons. The people of Buner realised they had been surrounded on all four sides. There was no help from the Government and the security forces. The Taliban took control of largely venerated Mazar of Pir Baba and banned women's entry into it. They began recruiting Talib; occupied the house of a man who opposed them; banned music in buses; hijacked vehicles; looted medicine shops and patrolled streets to terrorise the local population.

Neither the provincial nor federal government tried to stop the Taliban till the Americans began expressing their shock at the fact that Buner was just 60 miles away from Islamabad, the national capital of Pakistan. This development strengthened the fears that Taliban/al-Qaeda's ultimate goal was Islamabad and the capture of the country's nuclear arsenal was imminent.

The government took more than three weeks to launch operations against the Taliban in Buner. But the local people say more civilians were killed in these operations than Talib, who have all shifted to safer places.
The Army spokesman, General Athar Abbas, said the Taliban were using the local people as human shields. What is worrying is that the Army is nowhere near success in Buner. It is true that the Taliban have expanded the area of their writ in the past one year when the present PPP-led Government took over. And, accordingly, the threat of Taliban/al-Qaeda takeover has begun to look a possibility. There are estimates that Taliban already occupy 17 per cent of Pakistan's territory.

President Obama, unlike his predecessor George W. Bush, seems interested more in the stability in Afghanistan and Pakistan than in pushing democracy. On completing 100 days in office recently, he said: "I am gravely concerned about the situation in Pakistan…..the civilian government there right now is very fragile and don't seems to have the capacity to deliver basic services: schools, healthcare, rule of law, a judicial system that works for the majority of the people." It was very transparently insinuated that the present civilian leadership cannot protect the country's nuclear arsenal from terrorists. But he put his trust in the Army's ability to do so. "I'm confident that we can ensure that Pakistan's nuclear arsenal is secure. The Pakistani Army recognises the hazard of those weapons falling into the wrong hands. It is taking much more seriously the armed threat from militant extremists."

This strong statement, which has been strongly resented by some sections in Pakistan, is suspected to have been based on possible briefing by Pakistani Army leaders. What Mr Obama said is a tragic truth about Pakistan. But it is also a fact that terrorism and Pakistan's clandestine nuclear programme grew together as cousins in the 1980s, with American direct or indirect support.

 

http://www.dailypioneer.com/174877/Pak-Army-cant-sustain-gains.html
 


1 posted on 05/17/2009 5:23:40 AM PDT by MyTwoCopperCoins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MyTwoCopperCoins

“We need to develop our capability and we need much more support,” said Pakistan’s president, Zardari. “We need much, much more than the $1 billion [military aid] we’ve been getting, which is nothing. We’ve got 150,000 troops in [the tribal areas] - just the movement of that number would cost $1 billion.”

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2252391/posts


2 posted on 05/17/2009 5:28:18 AM PDT by MyTwoCopperCoins (I don't have a license to kill; I have a learner's permit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MyTwoCopperCoins

““We need to develop our capability and we need much more support,” said Pakistan’s president, Zardari.”

Nahh... you just have to stop being belligerent to India and go do the job you are supposed to do which is kill jihadists.


3 posted on 05/17/2009 6:33:56 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Climate change alarmists are Warm-Mongers. Now that's funny right there. I don't care who you are.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MyTwoCopperCoins

Is sceptical the same as skeptical?


4 posted on 05/17/2009 6:36:59 AM PDT by Terabitten (Vets wrote a blank check, payable to the Constitution, for an amount up to and including their life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah; Indian_Fighter_Kite; Knitting A Conundrum; Hari prasad; MimirsWell; ...

Kurukshetra War - Kali Yuga ping...

To be added to or removed from this ping list, please FReepmail Sir Francis Dashwood.

5 posted on 05/17/2009 6:45:36 AM PDT by Sir Francis Dashwood (Arjuna, why have you have dropped your bow???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Terabitten

Yes.

Commonwealth countries (G.Britain, India, Australia, NZ,etc) use that spelling of the same word.

Another word spelled differently is ‘spelt’ instead of ‘spelled’.


6 posted on 05/17/2009 10:20:37 AM PDT by MyTwoCopperCoins (I don't have a license to kill; I have a learner's permit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson