Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

No Laughing Matter: A bad D.C. (White House Correspondents') dinner.
National Review ^ | May 11, 2009 | Kathryn Jean Lopez

Posted on 05/11/2009 10:08:35 AM PDT by reaganaut1

You may remember the evening of Sept. 29, 2001. On that evening, Rudy Giuliani appeared on Saturday Night Live. It was 18 days after the September 11 attacks. This appearance of the mayor of New York — who had spent almost three weeks comforting a shaken nation, mourning with families of the murdered, and leading — was widely considered a signal: We could laugh again. We needed to laugh. Heaven knows, Giuliani must have needed it as much as anyone.

Laughter can be a beautiful thing, a great gift in difficult times. A way to reach those who might not otherwise respond to you or your message. Laughter can also be something vicious, coming from a very dark place.

The latter is what enveloped our nation’s capital at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner on Saturday night. Jokes about our former president and vice president. Jokes about interrogation. Jokes about gay marriage. Jokes about abstinence. Jokes about terrorism. Jokes about addiction. Jokes about abortion and embryo destruction. And the president of the United States was the headliner, responsible for some but not all of the shamefulness of the night.

The last time I was at the Naval Observatory was in December, at the then vice president’s Christmas party. Toward the back of the room was a screen displaying photos. There was humor in them — Dick Cheney wearing a Darth Vader mask — but they also documented what was overwhelmingly present in the eight years of the Bush presidency: We are at war. We are in a war not of our choosing. And the responsibility to protect and defend America weighed heavily on our elected leaders each day.

Cheney is on the sidelines now, and there is a new party in town. The new president, insulting the administration before him, told us in his inaugural that he was going to put away childish things.

But even the children were not left out of the jokes. President Obama used his daughters to make light of Air Force One’s Lower Manhattan flyover. Before Saturday night, there was no better visual symbol of this administration’s September 10 policy blindness. Air Force One might as well have been flying a banner that read “We Don’t Get It.” Obama’s joke about the incident could be considered the banner.

Following the president, Wanda Sykes said:

Mr. President . . . you’ve had your fair share of critics. . . . Rush Limbaugh, one of your big critics, boy — Rush Limbaugh said he hopes this administration fails. So you’re saying, “I hope America fails.” You’re like, “I don’t care about people losing their homes, their jobs, or our soldiers in Iraq.” He just wants our country to fail.

To me, that’s treason. He’s not saying anything differently than Osama bin Laden is saying. You know you might want to look into this, sir, because I think Rush Limbaugh was the 20th hijacker but he was just so strung out on Oxycontin he missed his flight.

Too much?

You’re laughing inside, I know you’re laughing.

Rush Limbaugh: “I hope the country fails.” I hope his kidneys fail, how about that?

He needs a waterboarding, that’s what he needs.

And some of the most prominent luminaries in Washington politics, media, and popular culture laughed. You don’t have to be a “dittohead” to know that is shameful (and it would be just as shameful if the rant were about a left-wing host, at a right-wing gala).

But Sykes wasn’t the core problem, as tasteless and awful as her jokes were. I keep going back to Sasha and Malia. The president used his daughters, two days after he let one of his staff take the fall for his administration’s use of everyone in Lower Manhattan and along the Hudson River on a clear morning as a prop in the Obama show. Nearly 3,000 Americans were murdered on a day not unlike that one, and his administration needlessly freaked out those who witnessed it. And he’s laughing.

Of course, that was his job Saturday night. To go to the Reagan Hilton and entertain the media and Hollywood audience. Presumably the crowd likes him (he joked about this too) and hates Rush. He knew what the crowd wanted and ran with it. It was unpresidential when Bush did that (remember looking for weapons of mass destruction at the Radio and TV Correspondents’ Dinner?) and it’s unpresidential when Obama does it. And it’s downright shameful when done with the meanspiritedness that was on display Saturday night.

Somehow Dick Cheney, who continues to stand athwart unseriousness yelling “Stop,” is the enemy. Somehow Rush Limbaugh, conservative stalwart, the embodiment of capitalist success, a man who has struggled with adversity with an inspiring humility, is someone we’re to disdain so much as to laugh at the prospect of his kidneys’ failing. Somehow we are supposed to be pining for one of the nastiest men on television to do something that everyone laughing at the joke presumably considers torture to Sean Hannity, who, agree with him or not, is the happiest of warriors compared with Keith Olbermann.

The reviews of the president Saturday night were good, I keep hearing. But what happened Saturday night was not right. The same liberal elite that has brought us hate-crimes laws and speech codes spewed real venom. The White House Correspondents’ Dinner is below the president, whoever he is (I thought this when Bush was president and I think it even more today). But that dinner Saturday night —in the jokes the president of the United States of America was willing to make and to laugh at — was beneath America.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: correspondents; correspondentsdinner; democrat; democrats; dinner; impeachobama; journalists; obama; wandasykes; whcd; whitehouse
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

1 posted on 05/11/2009 10:08:36 AM PDT by reaganaut1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Wanda who?


2 posted on 05/11/2009 10:11:29 AM PDT by theDentist (qwerty ergo typo : i type, therefore i misspell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

bttt


3 posted on 05/11/2009 10:13:41 AM PDT by Guenevere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

bookmark


4 posted on 05/11/2009 10:13:46 AM PDT by Corin Stormhands ("Failed Obama Administration" (TM))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg

find later


5 posted on 05/11/2009 10:15:42 AM PDT by nutmeg (DemocRATs: The party of tax cheats and other assorted crooks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Crude, rude and socially unacceptable...


6 posted on 05/11/2009 10:16:13 AM PDT by Notasoccermom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

I didn’t realize Lopez wrote this well. She captured the evening quite well. I couldn’t believe what I was hearing when I heard clips.


7 posted on 05/11/2009 10:19:24 AM PDT by twigs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Following the president, Wanda Sykes said: "Mr. President . . . you’ve had your fair share of critics. . . . Rush Limbaugh, one of your big critics, boy — Rush Limbaugh said he hopes this administration fails. So you’re saying, “I hope America fails.” You’re like, “I don’t care about people losing their homes, their jobs, or our soldiers in Iraq.” He just wants our country to fail. To me, that’s treason. He’s not saying anything differently than Osama bin Laden is saying. You know you might want to look into this, sir, because I think Rush Limbaugh was the 20th hijacker but he was just so strung out on Oxycontin he missed his flight. Too much? You’re laughing inside, I know you’re laughing. Rush Limbaugh: “I hope the country fails.” I hope his kidneys fail, how about that? He needs a waterboarding, that’s what he needs."

My cat caught himself a new toy last night.
I now understand why he called it, `Wanda`

Martin says, "Solidarity with Punkin, the cat who lives with Rush Limbaugh"
8 posted on 05/11/2009 10:21:31 AM PDT by BigEdLB (Now there ARE 1,000,000 regrets - but it may be too late.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Is there a transcript of that program? I’d like to read some of the filth that passed for comedy the other night.


9 posted on 05/11/2009 10:21:53 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (Pres__ent Obama's own grandmother says he was born in Kenya. She was there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

And we’re supposed to want crack dealers to get reduced sentences.

That’s just the President being the President.


10 posted on 05/11/2009 10:22:49 AM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Notasoccermom
That's totally inappropriate. It's lewd, vesivius, salacious, outrageous!


11 posted on 05/11/2009 10:23:31 AM PDT by Sig Sauer P220 (The great object is that every man be armed. - Patrick Henry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Our “elites” have nothing but contempt for most Americans.

They have contempt for the ideals that made American great.

They have contempt for the Constitution.

They have contempt for their own country.

Out in public, they hesitate to express the depth and venom of that contempt.

But in private, amongst themselves, it is plain to see. In fact, they compete with each other to see who can be the most contemptuous, the most vile.

These people are the ruin of this nation - the not-so-secret agenda they are gleefully carrying out.


12 posted on 05/11/2009 10:25:55 AM PDT by mojito
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
'The same liberal elite that has brought us hate-crimes laws and speech codes spewed real venom.'

And are the first to squeal like stuck pigs when you call them out on it...the speech codes Statists enforce are more often than not utilized to silence their opposition...as in the case when a number of Celebrities and Academics jumped all over Rush Limbaugh for voicing his opinion on this Administration's horrid domestic and national security policies.

13 posted on 05/11/2009 10:30:55 AM PDT by T Lady (The MSM: Pravda West)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
So this is the Left's idea of a roast?

Making ugly “jokes’ about political opponents who aren't even there?

Is this what Hussein will expect if he ever has the guts to attend a Gridiron Dinner?

14 posted on 05/11/2009 10:35:54 AM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

I’m glad Sarah skipped it. Though the possibility of her being there to kick Wanda Psycho’s ass is intriguing.


15 posted on 05/11/2009 10:43:32 AM PDT by ScottinVA (Impeach President Soros!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BigEdLB

A (rotten) Fish Called Wanda.


16 posted on 05/11/2009 10:45:14 AM PDT by ScottinVA (Impeach President Soros!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: theDentist

Exactly. The reason Ruh will ignore the entire thing and definitely not sue for slander or take any other action.


17 posted on 05/11/2009 11:01:29 AM PDT by Tanniker Smith (The sun glinted off chiseled pectorals sculpted during four weight-lifting sessions each week and...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

A very good article. Very good.


18 posted on 05/11/2009 11:14:29 AM PDT by SueRae
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rJ-xA6D4Ju8
“The President Gets Laughs at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner”
(Added May 11, 2009)

#

Note: Includes video.

Note: The following text is a quote:

http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/Remarks-by-the-President-at-White-House-Correspondents-Association-Dinner-5/9/2009/

THE BRIEFING ROOM

THE WHITE HOUSE

Office of the Press Secretary

_________________________________________________________________

For Immediate Release May 10, 2009

REMARKS BY THE PRESIDENT
AT WHITE HOUSE CORRESPONDENTS’ ASSOCIATION DINNER

May 9, 2009

Washington Hilton
Washington, D.C.

9:56 P.M. EDT

THE PRESIDENT: Thank you. Thank you, everybody. Good evening. You know, I had an entire speech prepared for this wonderful occasion, but now that I’m here I think I’m going to try something a little different. Tonight I want to speak from the heart. I’m going to speak off the cuff. (Teleprompters rise.) (Laughter and applause.)

Good evening. (Laughter.) Pause for laughter. (Laughter.) Wait a minute, this may not be working as well as I — (laughter.) Let me try that again.

Good evening, everybody. (Applause.) I would like to welcome you all to the 10-day anniversary of my first 100 days. (Laughter.) I am Barack Obama. Most of you covered me. All of you voted for me. (Laughter and applause.) Apologies to the Fox table. (Laughter.) They’re — where are they? I have to confess I really did not want to be here tonight, but I knew I had to come — just one more problem that I’ve inherited from George W. Bush. (Laughter.)

But now that I’m here, it’s great to be here. It’s great to see all of you. Michelle Obama is here, the First Lady of the United States. (Applause.) Hasn’t she been an outstanding First Lady? (Applause.) She’s even begun to bridge the differences that have divided us for so long, because no matter which party you belong to we can all agree that Michelle has the right to bare arms. (Laughter and applause.)

Now Sasha and Malia aren’t here tonight because they’re grounded. You can’t just take Air Force One on a joy ride to Manhattan. (Laughter.) I don’t care whose kids you are. (Laughter.) We’ve been setting some ground rules here. They’re starting to get a little carried away.

Now, speaking — when I think about children obviously I think about Michelle and it reminds me that tomorrow is Mother’s Day. Happy Mother’s Day to all the mothers in the audience. (Applause.) I do have to say, though, that this is a tough holiday for Rahm Emanuel because he’s not used to saying the word “day” after “mother.” (Laughter.) That’s true. (Laughter.)

David Axelrod is here. You know, David and I have been together for a long time. I can still remember — I got to sort of — I tear up a little bit when I think back to that day that I called Ax so many years ago and said, you and I can do wonderful things together. And he said to me the same thing that partners all across America are saying to one another right now: Let’s go to Iowa and make it official. (Laughter and applause.)

Michael Steele is in the house tonight. (Applause.) Or as he would say, “in the heezy.” (Laughter.) What’s up? (Laughter.) Where is Michael? Michael, for the last time, the Republican Party does not qualify for a bailout. (Laughter.) Rush Limbaugh does not count as a troubled asset, I’m sorry. (Laughter.)

Dick Cheney was supposed to be here but he is very busy working on his memoirs, tentatively titled, “How to Shoot Friends and Interrogate People.” (Laughter.)

You know, it’s been a whirlwind of activity these first hundred days. We’ve enacted a major economic recovery package, we passed a budget, we forged a new path in Iraq, and no President in history has ever named three Commerce Secretaries this quickly. (Laughter.) Which reminds me, if Judd Gregg is here, your business cards are ready now. (Laughter.)

On top of that, I’ve also reversed the ban on stem cell research, signed an expansion — (applause) — signed an expansion of the children’s health insurance. Just last week, Car and Driver named me auto executive of the year. (Laughter.) Something I’m very proud of.

We’ve also begun to change the culture in Washington. We’ve even made the White House a place where people can learn and can grow. Just recently, Larry Summers asked if he could chair the White House Council on Women and Girls. (Laughter.) And I do appreciate that Larry is here tonight because it is seven hours past his bedtime. (Laughter.) Gibbs liked that one. (Laughter.)

In the last hundred days, we’ve also grown the Democratic Party by infusing it with new energy and bringing in fresh, young faces like Arlen Specter. (Laughter.) Now, Joe Biden rightly deserves a lot of credit for convincing Arlen to make the switch, but Secretary Clinton actually had a lot to do with it too. One day she just pulled him aside and she said, Arlen, you know what I always say — “if you can’t beat them, join them.” (Laughter.)

Which brings me to another thing that’s changed in this new, warmer, fuzzier White House, and that’s my relationship with Hillary. You know, we had been rivals during the campaign, but these days we could not be closer. In fact, the second she got back from Mexico she pulled into a hug and gave me a big kiss. (Laughter.) Told me I’d better get down there myself. (Laughter.) Which I really appreciated. I mean, it was — it was nice. (Laughter.)

And of course we’ve also begun to change America’s image in the world. We talked about this during this campaign and we’re starting to execute. We’ve renewed alliances with important partners and friends. If you look on the screen there, there I am with Japanese Prime Minister Taro Aso. There I am with Gordon Brown.

But as I said during the campaign, we can’t just talk to our friends. As hard as it is, we also have to talk to our enemies, and I’ve begun to do exactly that. Take a look at the monitor there. (Laughter.) Now, let me be clear, just because he handed me a copy of Peter Pan does not mean that I’m going to read it — (laughter) — but it’s good diplomatic practice to just accept these gifts.

All this change hasn’t been easy. Change never is. So I’ve cut the tension by bringing a new friend to the White House. He’s warm, he’s cuddly, loyal, enthusiastic. You just have to keep him on a tight leash. Every once in a while he goes charging off in the wrong direction and gets himself into trouble. But enough about Joe Biden. (Laughter.)

All in all, we’re proud of the change we’ve brought to Washington in these first hundred days but we’ve got a lot of work left to do, as all of you know. So I’d like to talk a little bit about what my administration plans to achieve in the next hundred days.

During the second hundred days, we will design, build and open a library dedicated to my first hundred days. (Laughter.) It’s going to be big, folks. (Laughter.) In the next hundred days, I will learn to go off the prompter and Joe Biden will learn to stay on the prompter. (Laughter.)

In the next hundred days, our bipartisan outreach will be so successful that even John Boehner will consider becoming a Democrat. After all, we have a lot in common. He is a person of color. (Laughter.) Although not a color that appears in the natural world. (Laughter.) What’s up, John? (Laughter.)

In the next hundred days, I will meet with a leader who rules over millions with an iron fist, who owns the airwaves and uses his power to crush all who would challenge his authority at the ballot box. It’s good to see you, Mayor Bloomberg. (Laughter.)

In the next hundred days, we will housetrain our dog, Bo, because the last thing Tim Geithner needs is someone else treating him like a fire hydrant. (Laughter.) In the next hundred days, I will strongly consider losing my cool. (Laughter.)

Finally, I believe that my next hundred days will be so successful I will be able to complete them in 72 days. (Laughter.) And on the 73rd day, I will rest. (Laughter.)

I just — I want to end by saying a few words about the men and women in this room whose job it is to inform the public and pursue the truth. You know, we meet tonight at a moment of extraordinary challenge for this nation and for the world, but it’s also a time of real hardship for the field of journalism. And like so many other businesses in this global age, you’ve seen sweeping changes and technology and communications that lead to a sense of uncertainty and anxiety about what the future will hold.

Across the country, there are extraordinary, hardworking journalists who have lost their jobs in recent days, recent weeks, recent months. And I know that each newspaper and media outlet is wrestling with how to respond to these changes, and some are struggling simply to stay open. And it won’t be easy. Not every ending will be a happy one.

But it’s also true that your ultimate success as an industry is essential to the success of our democracy. It’s what makes this thing work. You know, Thomas Jefferson once said that if he had the choice between a government without newspapers, or newspapers without a government, he would not hesitate to choose the latter.

Clearly, Thomas Jefferson never had cable news to contend with — (laughter) — but his central point remains: A government without newspapers, a government without a tough and vibrant media of all sorts, is not an option for the United States of America. (Applause.)

So I may not — I may not agree with everything you write or report. I may even complain, or more likely Gibbs will complain, from time to time about how you do your jobs, but I do so with the knowledge that when you are at your best, then you help me be at my best. You help all of us who serve at the pleasure of the American people do our jobs better by holding us accountable, by demanding honesty, by preventing us from taking shortcuts and falling into easy political games that people are so desperately weary of.

And that kind of reporting is worth preserving — not just for your sake, but for the public’s. We count on you to help us make sense of a complex world and tell the stories of our lives the way they happen, and we look for you for truth, even if it’s always an approximation, even if — (laughter.)

This is a season of renewal and reinvention. That is what government must learn to do, that’s what businesses must learn to do, and that’s what journalism is in the process of doing. And when I look out at this room and think about the dedicated men and women whose questions I’ve answered over the last few years, I know that for all the challenges this industry faces, it’s not short on talent or creativity or passion or commitment. It’s not short of young people who are eager to break news or the not-so-young who still manage to ask the tough ones time and time again. These qualities alone will not solve all your problems, but they certainly prove that the problems are worth solving. And that is a good place as any to begin.

So I offer you my thanks, I offer you my support, and I look forward to working with you and answering to you and the American people as we seek a more perfect union in the months and years ahead.

Thank you very much, everybody. Thank you. (Applause.)

END
10:12 P.M. EDT


19 posted on 05/11/2009 4:16:30 PM PDT by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Entire dinner - video:

http://www.cspan.org/Watch/Media/2009/05/09/HP/A/18461/2009+White+House+Correspondents+Dinner.aspx

Video description - quote:

2009 WHITE HOUSE CORRESPONDENTS’ DINNER
Saturday

Pres. Obama and comic actress Wanda Sykes are the highlights of this year’s White House Correspondents’ Dinner.
Washington, DC


20 posted on 05/11/2009 4:18:45 PM PDT by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson