Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: aNYCguy
You'll have to explain why particles accelerated to near-light speeds are observed to gain mass.

If I am correct, the particle accelerated to near light speed does not actually gain mass, it has an apparent mass gain when observed from outside because it's time has slowed down. I have decided that the choice between more mass/less time is indistinguishable outside of the system under study. Since both sets of equations reduce to the same expression, one cannot look at this case to determine what is really going on.

102 posted on 05/07/2009 9:37:28 AM PDT by lafroste (gravity is not a force. See my profile to read my novel absolutely free (I know, beyond shameless))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]


To: lafroste

Okay, let’s take a simpler situation lacking relativistic speeds. Mass can be observed to be lost in its own reference frame, say, when deuterium-tritium fusion takes place. There’s a certain amount of mass beforehand, and measurably less after the fusion takes place. Thus, mass is not conserved. I expect you’ll have a tough time reconciling your theory with this.


105 posted on 05/07/2009 3:23:04 PM PDT by aNYCguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson