Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/05/2009 6:31:55 PM PDT by carolgr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: carolgr
Love Canal was not a one-time aberration.

AlGore discovered other pollution sites?

2 posted on 05/05/2009 6:35:33 PM PDT by Ron Jeremy (sonic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: carolgr

What the author fails to mention when citing Love Canal is that it was a government agency, not a private corporation, that was responsible for the problems there. The full story is at http://www.reason.com/news/show/29319.html


3 posted on 05/05/2009 6:40:46 PM PDT by Squawk 8888 (TSA and DHS are jobs programs for people who are not smart enough to flip burgers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: carolgr

Cutting Edge International News?- Is that the one that features Bat Boy and Elvis piloting star cruisers?


4 posted on 05/05/2009 6:49:10 PM PDT by Carl LaFong (Experts say experts should be ignored.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: carolgr
This article is ridiculous. The numbers it throws out don't mean anything.

Love Canal was not a one-time aberration. The 1997 National Research Council’s estimate that the cost of cleaning up the thousands of known contaminated U.S. sites at that time could take 75 years and cost $1 trillion.

Well, sure, if yoou define "cleaning up" as getting rid of every last speck as opposed to simply keeping things at safe levels. Actually, $1 trillion amortized over 75 years may not be all that bad ... maybe even less than the EPA budget!

In 2002 the EPA cited General Motors and Ford as two of the top 100 corporate air polluters.

SOMEBODY has to be two of the top 100 corporate air polluters. I would be really surprised if it didn't include two of the largest manufacturing companies in country. It's not going to be Joe's Tannery or Starbucks, unless we get rid of all the manufacturing, then who knows?

A March 12, 2000 information sheet released by Stanford University stated that GM’s Delphi facility in Indiana released 603,900 pounds of toxic chemicals into the environment in 1994 alone.

Which "toxic chemicals?" Flouride is a toxic chemical, and we pour that into water on purpose. My guess is that 603,900 pounds is less than the amount of anti-freeze leaked out of cars in Michigan, Ohio and Illinois alone. By the "environment" do they mean the great lakes? What % is 603,900 pounds in Lake Michigan? .00000001% ? Certainly wantondumping is a bad idea, but giving a raw number like that is like Obama talking about cutting back spending by $100 million. It may not affect the big picture. We certainly don't know if they won't tell us what the toxic substance is.

The sheet also said that GM discharged more than 1,100 tons of volatile organic compounds in Arlington, Texas.

Okay, so these aren't toxic, but they are carbon containing chemicals that evaporate or turn to vapor. Even if you think that carbon in the air is a bad thing, 1,100 tons is spit in the ocean.

One example is the Carman Park Elementary School, of Flint Michigan, which has the alarming distinction of being in the 4th percentile nationally to the exposure of both cancer-causing airborne elements and also exposure to other toxic chemicals.

Again, somebody has to be in the fourth percentile. Some coal town in West Virginia is probably in the first percentile. Pick on them.

The school evaluation tool cites many toxic chemicals reaching the doorsteps of this Flint elementary school.

If I break a couple of vintage Sylvania TV tubes and a school is downwind of me, you can bet that "many toxic chemicals" might reach the door of the school. It just might not be in numbers that are biologically significant. (I actually did bust a bunch of tubes in a first grade classroom in the '60's...on purpose. I'd hate to think what would have happened to me today.)

The rest of the excerpt is hearsay quotations which may or may not be based in fact. The approach taken by the writer makes me question everything.
6 posted on 05/05/2009 7:12:49 PM PDT by Dr. Sivana (There is no salvation in politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: carolgr

> Love Canal was not a one-time aberration.
Could the author have been less informed.
Hooker Chem owned the Love Canal, a really nasty chemical dump.
Being an eyesore, they covered it over with a layer of topsoil and had it landscaped. They still planned to keep it and not let people be there.
Along came local politicians with an eye on using the nice park for their own needs.
They served Hooker with an eminent domain notice, Hooker objected but they took the property anyway. I think they paid Hooker some token amount to make things legal.
20+ years later, everyone forgot the whole thing and they built on the land. Later it was housing.
When the toxic problems surfaced, all fingers pointed to Hooker as the bad guy. The real bad guys were the Niagara Falls politicians.


7 posted on 05/05/2009 7:16:38 PM PDT by BuffaloJack (To stand up for Capitalism is to hope Teleprompter Boy fails.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: carolgr
Just wait until The New General Motors shuts down all it's plants.

Problem solved.

8 posted on 05/05/2009 7:21:08 PM PDT by TYVets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: carolgr
...603,900 pounds of toxic chemicals into the environment in 1994 alone

Probably that nasty, noxious, polluting and very toxic Carbon Dioxide.

9 posted on 05/05/2009 7:22:41 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson