Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gidget7

like i said, the gays sponsored the amendment and the vote on it was 34-1. They wrote it because they feared a serious and strong amendment would pass. And this gives cover to those who voted for the bill.

Rell may say that she is personally opposed, but she is politically opposed to gay-marriage opponents. She has no use for conservatives and she will rue the day she signed this.

Again, all the serious amendments failed. Maggie could try to grow a brain.


13 posted on 04/23/2009 1:46:16 PM PDT by campaignPete R-CT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: campaignPete R-CT
I hear you Pete. I swear, the longer and more invasive this stuff becomes, the less “tolerance these rabid activist will have. Personally I have zero left. I acknowledge they exist, my tolerance begins and ends there. The stuff they are throwing at innocent children in this country is criminal, they have NO IDEA the long term repercussions of it on those children. Nor do they care. Most of them are fully on board with the degeneration of society, and it is the children who will suffer for it the most.

Schools in general have not tolerated bullying for many years now. That is the ONLY stand that schools should take, period. The rest of it is window dressing and it damages society greatly.

I have had no use for Rell from the day she took over for the other RINO.

15 posted on 04/23/2009 3:40:26 PM PDT by gidget7 (Duncan Hunter-Valley Forge Republican!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson