Murtha is not safe from charges of treason for slurring our troops with falsehoods in wartime to sink American troop and civilian morale on the war effort AND to embolden and justify the actions of the enemy.
Nice try, but no cigar. Murtha is a ‘Rat, Murtha is a protected ‘Rat, Murtha is a former Marine (he’s not now, because he has dishonored and stained every Marine with his despicable behavior.
Murtha will get a pass like all ‘Rat traitors do.
If they insist that Murtha was speaking to “his duties as a congressman”, then his duties as a congressman included the trials of these Marines.
That means he publicly convicted these men and made incredibly prejudicial statements about these men before their trials were complete.
If he was speaking to his duties as a congressman, then he engaged in unlawful influencing of their trials, and there’s no way they can ever be convicted without it appearing they might have been railroaded.
If he was speaking to his duties as a congressman, then these trials are indelibly tainted, and they should be thrown out on that basis.
>Murtha is not safe from charges of treason for slurring our troops with falsehoods in wartime to sink American troop and civilian morale on the war effort AND to embolden and justify the actions of the enemy.
BINGO! — Also note that we can still kill people for treason, and wouldn’t it be a good precedent to hang this guy for his treason?