The Pulitzers should be renamed "The Jason Blairs" or "The Janet Cookes"
1 posted on
04/23/2009 5:15:02 AM PDT by
PurpleMan
To: PurpleMan
“The Jason Blairs”.,..from now on....
2 posted on
04/23/2009 5:18:15 AM PDT by
Doogle
(USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
To: PurpleMan
Why the surprise? The NYT still hangs the Pulitzer on its wall that it “won” for covering up Stalin’s starvation mass-murder of the Ukrainians.
They have never changed.
3 posted on
04/23/2009 5:20:09 AM PDT by
Travis McGee
("Foreign Enemies And Traitors" will be ready the first week of May.)
To: PurpleMan
Why outrage? These awards are all political now. They give them out to people who write about the fantasies they wish were actually true.
4 posted on
04/23/2009 5:25:05 AM PDT by
BallyBill
(Serial Hit-N-Run poster)
To: PurpleMan
Why not just call it the “PUTZ PRIZE”?
5 posted on
04/23/2009 5:26:00 AM PDT by
BilLies
To: PurpleMan
We need to deemphasize the Nobel prize and the Pulitzer prize as they are both so political and do not represent genius or impartiality, if they ever did.
7 posted on
04/23/2009 5:30:34 AM PDT by
truemiester
((If the U.S. should fail, a veil of darkness will come over the Earth for a thousand years))
To: PurpleMan
A prize by libtards, of libtards, and for libtards,
Yawn...
9 posted on
04/23/2009 5:37:27 AM PDT by
markomalley
(Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus)
To: PurpleMan
Yep. They deal in falsehoods; so why is anyone surprised?
10 posted on
04/23/2009 5:38:07 AM PDT by
freekitty
(Give me back my conservative vote.)
To: PurpleMan
Be patient. NYT Co. is headed toward penny stock status, and this time next year you’ll probably be able to find Putz Sulzberger’s pulitzers on a yard sale table somewhere on Long Island.
12 posted on
04/23/2009 5:43:19 AM PDT by
Clioman
To: PurpleMan
Nothing but a bunch of liberals patting themselves on the back. Who cares!!!!
14 posted on
04/23/2009 5:49:18 AM PDT by
ontap
(Just another backstabbing conservative)
To: PurpleMan
It’s the primary target or political objective that is of greatest importance, not the accuracy or truthfulness of the story.
To: PurpleMan
The Pulitzer Prize has been devalued by politics to a point where it is today the journalistic equivalent of a Grammy Award.
16 posted on
04/23/2009 5:56:00 AM PDT by
andy58-in-nh
(You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life.)
To: PurpleMan
for a story discredited by an independent investigation When are all these upper-crusters going to realize these ‘prestigious awards’ are really nothing more than popularity contests at the intellectual masterbater's club?
19 posted on
04/23/2009 6:07:11 AM PDT by
MamaTexan
(~ The People of the several States are not 'subject to the jurisdiction' of the United States ~)
To: PurpleMan
The Pulitzers should be renamed "The Jason Blairs" or "The Janet Cookes"I think I'd much rather win a "Buckley"...
24 posted on
04/23/2009 6:58:43 AM PDT by
Onelifetogive
(Check out Puppy News at www.buyingapuppy.com)
To: PurpleMan
They added: "It hardly requires genius to understand that Mr. Barstow's intent was to damage the credibility and reputation of the Bush Administration, our Military and that his publicly discredited attempts to undercut our Nation's bravest accomplishes little more than turning the Prize, his newspaper and his reputation into a laughing stock." Larry Di Rita, a former Rumsfeld aide who helped set up the program, told Inside the Ring, "It seems to violate the Pulitzer committee's time-honored tradition of awarding the prize before the story is later debunked. This time they at least waited for the debunking to happen first. I look at it as just another laughable reminder that the establishment media are awarding themselves ever more grandiose awards in direct proportion to their increasing irrelevance and desperation."
Every award [Pulitzer, Nobel Peace Prize, Oscar] has become Orwellian. None of these prizes are worth a bucket of spit now.
30 posted on
04/23/2009 8:02:27 AM PDT by
happygrl
(Hope and Change or Rope and Chains?)
To: PurpleMan
http://www.nytco.com/images/awards_barstow-bergman.jpg
went to New York Times reporter David Barstow for his story, “Behind TV Analysts, Pentagon’s Hidden Hand”
“Awarded to David Barstow of The New York Times for his tenacious reporting that revealed how some retired generals, working as radio and television analysts, had been co-opted by the Pentagon to make its case for the war in Iraq, and how many of them also had undisclosed ties to companies that benefited from policies they defended.”
31 posted on
04/23/2009 8:08:49 AM PDT by
kcvl
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson