Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

The Pulitzers should be renamed "The Jason Blairs" or "The Janet Cookes"
1 posted on 04/23/2009 5:15:02 AM PDT by PurpleMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: PurpleMan

“The Jason Blairs”.,..from now on....


2 posted on 04/23/2009 5:18:15 AM PDT by Doogle (USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PurpleMan

Why the surprise? The NYT still hangs the Pulitzer on its wall that it “won” for covering up Stalin’s starvation mass-murder of the Ukrainians.

They have never changed.


3 posted on 04/23/2009 5:20:09 AM PDT by Travis McGee ("Foreign Enemies And Traitors" will be ready the first week of May.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PurpleMan
Why outrage? These awards are all political now. They give them out to people who write about the fantasies they wish were actually true.
4 posted on 04/23/2009 5:25:05 AM PDT by BallyBill (Serial Hit-N-Run poster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PurpleMan

Why not just call it the “PUTZ PRIZE”?


5 posted on 04/23/2009 5:26:00 AM PDT by BilLies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PurpleMan
We need to deemphasize the Nobel prize and the Pulitzer prize as they are both so political and do not represent genius or impartiality, if they ever did.
7 posted on 04/23/2009 5:30:34 AM PDT by truemiester ((If the U.S. should fail, a veil of darkness will come over the Earth for a thousand years))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PurpleMan

A prize by libtards, of libtards, and for libtards,

Yawn...


9 posted on 04/23/2009 5:37:27 AM PDT by markomalley (Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PurpleMan

Yep. They deal in falsehoods; so why is anyone surprised?


10 posted on 04/23/2009 5:38:07 AM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PurpleMan

Be patient. NYT Co. is headed toward penny stock status, and this time next year you’ll probably be able to find Putz Sulzberger’s pulitzers on a yard sale table somewhere on Long Island.


12 posted on 04/23/2009 5:43:19 AM PDT by Clioman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PurpleMan

Nothing but a bunch of liberals patting themselves on the back. Who cares!!!!


14 posted on 04/23/2009 5:49:18 AM PDT by ontap (Just another backstabbing conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PurpleMan

It’s the primary target or political objective that is of greatest importance, not the accuracy or truthfulness of the story.


15 posted on 04/23/2009 5:53:51 AM PDT by Common Sense 101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PurpleMan

The Pulitzer Prize has been devalued by politics to a point where it is today the journalistic equivalent of a Grammy Award.


16 posted on 04/23/2009 5:56:00 AM PDT by andy58-in-nh (You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PurpleMan
for a story discredited by an independent investigation

When are all these upper-crusters going to realize these ‘prestigious awards’ are really nothing more than popularity contests at the intellectual masterbater's club?

19 posted on 04/23/2009 6:07:11 AM PDT by MamaTexan (~ The People of the several States are not 'subject to the jurisdiction' of the United States ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PurpleMan
The Pulitzers should be renamed "The Jason Blairs" or "The Janet Cookes"

I think I'd much rather win a "Buckley"...

24 posted on 04/23/2009 6:58:43 AM PDT by Onelifetogive (Check out Puppy News at www.buyingapuppy.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PurpleMan
They added: "It hardly requires genius to understand that Mr. Barstow's intent was to damage the credibility and reputation of the Bush Administration, our Military and that his publicly discredited attempts to undercut our Nation's bravest accomplishes little more than turning the Prize, his newspaper and his reputation into a laughing stock."

Larry Di Rita, a former Rumsfeld aide who helped set up the program, told Inside the Ring, "It seems to violate the Pulitzer committee's time-honored tradition of awarding the prize before the story is later debunked. This time they at least waited for the debunking to happen first. I look at it as just another laughable reminder that the establishment media are awarding themselves ever more grandiose awards in direct proportion to their increasing irrelevance and desperation."

Every award [Pulitzer, Nobel Peace Prize, Oscar] has become Orwellian. None of these prizes are worth a bucket of spit now.

30 posted on 04/23/2009 8:02:27 AM PDT by happygrl (Hope and Change or Rope and Chains?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PurpleMan

http://www.nytco.com/images/awards_barstow-bergman.jpg

went to New York Times reporter David Barstow for his story, “Behind TV Analysts, Pentagon’s Hidden Hand”

“Awarded to David Barstow of The New York Times for his tenacious reporting that revealed how some retired generals, working as radio and television analysts, had been co-opted by the Pentagon to make its case for the war in Iraq, and how many of them also had undisclosed ties to companies that benefited from policies they defended.”


31 posted on 04/23/2009 8:08:49 AM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson