To: SwinneySwitch
What does it take to join the Texas bar?
2 posted on
04/22/2009 4:46:33 PM PDT by
yldstrk
(My heros have always been cowboys--Reagan and Bush)
To: SwinneySwitch
Ashcroft should reconsider associating himself with someone like Sutton. He cannot draw in any Conservative money to the firm.
3 posted on
04/22/2009 4:47:17 PM PDT by
muawiyah
To: SwinneySwitch
"“They will be operating in Texas as Ashcroft Sutton Ratcliffe LLC.”Remember that name.
You'll hear it again, where something especially stupid, immoral, illegal, or just plain idiotic is being done within our "legal system."
5 posted on
04/22/2009 4:52:24 PM PDT by
Redbob
(W.W.J.B.D.: "What Would Jack Bauer Do?")
To: SwinneySwitch; calcowgirl
Disappointing! These political hacks really do stick together, don’t they?
6 posted on
04/22/2009 4:54:05 PM PDT by
AuntB
(The right to vote in America: Blacks 1870; Women 1920; Native Americans 1925; Foreigners 2008)
To: SwinneySwitch; Ajnin; abner; AndrewC; Arizona Carolyn; Brad's Gramma; Brytani; calex59; ...
PING!
RAMOS/COMPEAN Ping
Please freepmail me if you want on or off this list.
8 posted on
04/22/2009 4:54:53 PM PDT by
calcowgirl
(RECALL Abel Maldonado! - NO on Props 1A 1B 1C 1D 1E 1F)
To: SwinneySwitch
Sutton is a made man. I like John Ashcroft but...... He is wrong to hire no class Johnny. This reflects poorly on John Ashcroft
10 posted on
04/22/2009 4:59:43 PM PDT by
dennisw
(Your action becomes your habit. Your habit becomes your character, that becomes your destiny)
To: SwinneySwitch
This reflects VERY poorly on Ashcroft. I thought he had a bit more savvy and sense than this. It will lose him money and respect among many Conservatives. Sutton is corrupt — bought and paid for. That, or he is compromised and easily manipulated by more nefarious than himself. Either way — it AIN’T good.
14 posted on
04/22/2009 5:35:44 PM PDT by
patriot preacher
(To be a good American Citizen and a Christian IS NOT a contradiction. (www.mygration.blogspot.com))
To: SwinneySwitch
There were some here who were certain that Sutton was disgraced and wouldn’t be able to get a job. I guess they were wrong.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson