Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Personally, I would have killed the Space Station following the Challenger accident, and placed the savings into the return to the moon and on to Mars.
1 posted on 04/10/2009 5:00:24 PM PDT by zaphod3000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: zaphod3000

Once private firms can charge people $5,000 to see space, you won’t need to worry about it anymore. Soon they’ll be charging people $10,000 to stay a week in space. Give them 5-10 years and for $20,000 people will have a week on the moon.

All it takes it entreprenuers to do the job that government is too foolish to do.


2 posted on 04/10/2009 5:05:11 PM PDT by struggle ((The struggle continues))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: zaphod3000

I kinda agree, but the space station has given us a lot of insight into low earth orbit construction, which I’m sure will be vital to any serious mars mission. I suppose you have to look at the last half of the shuttle program as a prolonged modern day Gemini program.


3 posted on 04/10/2009 5:07:56 PM PDT by messierhunter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: zaphod3000

You do not think people living continuously in space for 10 years is a feat worth doing?

....Bob


4 posted on 04/10/2009 5:13:11 PM PDT by Lokibob (When handed lemons...Refuse to sign for them. Life's lemons can't be delivered without a signature.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: zaphod3000

“Personally, I would have killed the Space Station following the Challenger accident, and placed the savings into the return to the moon and on to Mars.”

...but do you really think that the same Congress that would have killed the Station would give a rat’s boutruss about going to the Moon and Mars?

In other words, the money would have simply gone into Section 8 (see Google).


8 posted on 04/10/2009 6:22:48 PM PDT by BobL (Drop a comment: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2180357/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: zaphod3000

For $100 billion, the thing better last a century.


10 posted on 04/10/2009 7:31:21 PM PDT by Right Wing Assault ( Obama, you're off the island!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: zaphod3000

“give new momentum to the scientific research conducted there”

I kinda missed that - any new drugs? zillion watt batteries for cars? ANYTHING?

(crickets)

Ya, wudda waste of dough. COuld have been back to the moon by now...maybe a small baase even. At least the tolet would flush.....


11 posted on 04/10/2009 7:38:07 PM PDT by ASOC (On strike until Congress lowers THEIR wages)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: zaphod3000
Personally, I would have killed the Space Station following the Challenger accident,

It should have been killed when it stopped being Space Station Freedom.

As for uses for the money, I'd have told the NASA geeks to do something cool and left it at that.

12 posted on 04/10/2009 7:45:56 PM PDT by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: zaphod3000

Of course, with creeps like Barney Frank in Congress, the one and only space exploration they’d vote to fund is a mission to Uranus.


14 posted on 04/10/2009 8:51:17 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson