[Non-Sequitur]

Therefore, he makes the decision SO outrageous that the appeals court basically HAS to listen to it and decide against him. In fact, Berg could probably argue that this judge needs to be relieved from making any more decisions on ANY case at all, frankly...

That doesn't change the merits of the case, or lack thereof. And it doesn't establish standing if there was none in the first place.

[rxsid]

All citizens of this country have standing. What's the harm caused? (Pre 1/20) BO has failed to prove he's eligible for the office, coupled with (at least) circumstantial evidence that fraud has been committed. Our Constitution is directly harmed by a usurper.

This issue of 'nobody' has standing is a judicial fabrication. For example (post 1/20), BO signs a law that raises taxes...that 'harms' everyone who's tax burden is raised. One example, the ex CEO Wagner from GM has standing. He lost his job because of a WH policy. The handful of judges that this has gone before, have taken the easy way out by saying 'no standing' or that their court has 'no jurisdiction.'

What's the consequence for them "granting" standing (which we all have anyway)? They go down in the history books of the world as the judge/court that heard the case that brought down the usurper that the world (supposedly) loves. Perhaps even violence happens as a direct result of their 'judgement' for standing. Perhaps their life is in jeopardy. All very real possibilities. Now, what's the consequence for them to do nothing (i.e. "give" no standing)? Nothing, for them personally. Of course, our Constitution is usurped. Since they care none about the Constitution to begin with, it matter's none to them. Major difference in outcomes. It's a 'cop out' for this radioactive hot potato Constitutional crisis.