Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: trumandogz

Of course not. We force-feed hunger strikers in Gitmo everyday, that’s not a negotiation.


17 posted on 04/09/2009 12:47:51 PM PDT by Deb (Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: Deb

The story claims that Thatcher gave in on the demand that the IRA prisoners not be required to wear prison issued clothing. That would thus mean that the IRA inmates were Prisoners of War.

That would have elevated Sands to POW Status and recognized that the UK was at war with the IRA.


19 posted on 04/09/2009 1:00:18 PM PDT by trumandogz (The Democrats are driving us to Socialism at I00 MPH -The GOP is driving us to Socialism at 97.5 MPH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: Deb
We force-feed hunger strikers in Gitmo everyday, that’s not a negotiation.

Sorry, but force feeding has nothing to do with the IRA story.

So now, what makes you think that Thatcher gave into the demand of terrorists and that she wanted to recognize that fact that the UK was at War with the IRA?

21 posted on 04/09/2009 1:08:35 PM PDT by trumandogz (The Democrats are driving us to Socialism at I00 MPH -The GOP is driving us to Socialism at 97.5 MPH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson