Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Twelve arrested in counter-terror raids
uk.reuters.com ^ | 04/09/09 | Tim Castle

Posted on 04/08/2009 7:32:01 PM PDT by TornadoAlley3

LONDON (Reuters) - Police arrested 12 men in counter-terrorism raids across northwest England on Wednesday hours after a security blunder by a top police officer.

The afternoon raids involving several hundred officers took place after Britain's most senior counter-terrorism officer was photographed openly carrying a secret document detailing plans for the arrests.

(Excerpt) Read more at uk.reuters.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; United Kingdom; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: alqaedauk; arrested; counterterrorism; immigration; jihadineurope; muslims; pakistanis; terror; uk

1 posted on 04/08/2009 7:32:02 PM PDT by TornadoAlley3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Detective Chief Superintendent Tony Porter, head of the North West Counter-Terrorism Unit, said the raids were part of a continuing operation and that police had acted on intelligence received.

Officers searched eight addresses in Manchester, Liverpool and Lancashire and arrested the 12 men at seven different places.

One was held at Liverpool’s John Moores University, two at a home improvements store in Clitheroe, Lancashire, and one on a motorway in Manchester.

Four others were held in Liverpool and four in Manchester.

The arrested men ranged from a teenager to a 41-year-old man, police said.


2 posted on 04/08/2009 7:34:16 PM PDT by TornadoAlley3 (Obama is everything Oklahoma is not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3

What’s the big deal that the guy was photographed carrying the document? Could you read the document from the photograph? Did it have a huge 48 pt title “Secret Plans To Bust Terror Ring”?


3 posted on 04/08/2009 7:36:32 PM PDT by Royal Wulff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3

I read this pretty carefully, and I also don’t really see the problem. Was he holding a manila folder with the name of the operation on the outside of it? So what? Was he holding a typed sheet with the names on it? How likely that you could read that from a photograph?

I’m not sure if this was a real security lapse or not. Although surely it would have made more sense to stick the thing in his locked briefcase.


4 posted on 04/08/2009 7:38:52 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/top-stories/2009/04/09/blunder-as-top-terror-cop-accidentally-shows-secret-documents-115875-21264624/


5 posted on 04/08/2009 7:41:31 PM PDT by TornadoAlley3 (Obama is everything Oklahoma is not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3

My, My....

10 of the 11 “suspects” were Pakistan nationals in the U.K. on student visas...

Pakistan - again and again and again....
Pakistan, the cockroach breeding ground of the Muslim world.


6 posted on 04/08/2009 7:48:54 PM PDT by river rat (Semper Fi - You may turn the other cheek, but I prefer to look into my enemy's vacant dead eyes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3

Thanks. More details at that link. I suppose it is possible that with a telephoto lens you could get photographs that could actually read the documents. Certainly that photo of his head is pretty detailed, and I imagine much more so with the original file or film.


7 posted on 04/08/2009 8:03:59 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Royal Wulff; Cicero; TornadoAlley3

This is bizarre. The Mirror article suggests that he wasn’t just photographed carrying the documents as one would normally carry them (i.e. at least in a folder, but for something like this one would expect a locked briefcase), but that the documents were photographed when they were completely exposed. Even ordinary people carrying documents of no importance to anyone but themselves, normally carry them in at least a folder, just for convenience and to protect them from damage. It’s really mind-boggling that it seems normal to this guy to just pick up a document and carry it in his hand when he’s taking it outside and to another building.

And who took the photos??? Presumably a journalist, and it would have had to be a deliberate effort to photograph the contents of the document, rather than a typical “Assistant Commissioner Quick is seen here leaving the offices of Prime Minister Gordon Brown” shot. Are journalists accustomed to being able to snag readable photos of juicy documents that this guy is carrying? One can only hope that the bumbling Mr. Quick is relieved of his duties tomorrow. It’s hard to send a message that the nation is serious about cracking down on terrorism with someone like this in charge of the effort.


8 posted on 04/08/2009 8:05:40 PM PDT by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3

Reuters would have called and warned them if they had the opportunity.


9 posted on 04/08/2009 9:16:11 PM PDT by TASMANIANRED (TAZ:Untamed, Unpredictable, Uninhibited.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3

“pictured yesterday clutching sensitive documents as he arrived in Downing Street”

Could just be they didn’t trust Downing Street with the info, so this “forces” the arrests forward.

Like the US, the current British administration is not what one would consider as patriotic.


10 posted on 04/09/2009 4:05:21 AM PDT by chuck_the_tv_out (click my name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3

“The afternoon raids involving several hundred officers took place after Britain’s most senior counter-terrorism officer was photographed openly carrying a secret document detailing plans for the arrests.”

~ Britain’s most senior counter-terrorism officer

Code Name: “Inspector Clouseau”


11 posted on 04/09/2009 5:09:09 AM PDT by stevie_d_64
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stevie_d_64
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/5130853/Terror-chief-Bob-Quick-quits-after-losing-confidence-of-MI5.html

Terror chief Bob Quick quits

12 posted on 04/09/2009 6:42:04 AM PDT by TornadoAlley3 (Obama is everything Oklahoma is not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentShrinker

13 posted on 04/09/2009 6:43:04 AM PDT by TornadoAlley3 (Obama is everything Oklahoma is not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentShrinker; All
One can only hope that the bumbling Mr. Quick is relieved of his duties tomorrow. It’s hard to send a message that the nation is serious about cracking down on terrorism with someone like this in charge of the effort.

Even though Mr Quick (ironic name in the light of these actions) has quit, maybe, speaking completely hypothetically of course, decided to 'accidentally leak' the info rather than entrust the Hi-de-Hi Muppet Show of a Governemnt to act on it?

Maybe, once again hypothetically, he thought that maybe this mission may get quashed under pressure to support community cohesion if he chose to delegate, so chose to burn that bridge right there and martyr his career. . .

One question, Why the hell, would the head of anti terrorism in the UK, broadcast the intricacies of a National anti terror operation to the World paparazzi?

Is it reasonable to believe THAT PERSON carrying THAT DOCUMENT in Public view was mistaken oversight?
14 posted on 04/09/2009 7:58:14 AM PDT by bethybabes69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3; GovernmentShrinker

Good grief. This guy is definitely not M.

And what’s in the pink folder? Lesbian anti-war terrorists?


15 posted on 04/09/2009 8:13:05 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: bethybabes69

Frankly, I don’t think some of these moonbat leftists have the slightest idea what the meaning of security is. And I think Gordon Brown’s appointments have been even worse than Tony Blair’s.

It’s like the people in Obama’s hand-picked administration who think the biggest security concern for our country is Global Warming.


16 posted on 04/09/2009 8:41:58 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3; GovernmentShrinker

I’ve done a little googling around, and this guy was involved in at least one earlier controversy, when he sent in a squad of gestapo-like police to arrest a Conservative member of Parliament who had complained about Blair’s open house for terrorist immigrants.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1090394/RICHARD-LITTLEJOHN-Damian-Greens-arrest-monstrous-abuse-power-gangsters-hounded-Dr-David-Kelly-death.html

See this later story on the false arrest:

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article5383533.ece

See also this further story about his political activities against the Conservatives and the resulting backlash:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/lawandorder/3900348/Metropolitan-police-terror-chief-Bob-Quick-issues-unreserved-apology-to-Tories.html

This guy was nothing but a dirty political operative, IMHO. And he was supposed to be in charge of security? What a farce.


17 posted on 04/09/2009 8:53:06 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3

That was quick...Pardon the pun...


18 posted on 04/09/2009 2:19:48 PM PDT by stevie_d_64
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson