The author has a problem with the bill, though he makes no real case against it. He is just pissed that democrats voted for a gun rights bill, and that it is popular.
1 posted on
04/06/2009 4:44:35 AM PDT by
marktwain
To: marktwain
I noticed that. All he does is resort to petty name-calling and whining since he doesn’t like guns. There are no statistics of any kind suggesting broader concealed carry is dangerous because in reality the opposite is true.
What’s really telling is that liberal newspapers (which this may or may not be) run editorials that are nothing but petty complaining.
2 posted on
04/06/2009 4:48:59 AM PDT by
flintsilver7
(Honest reporting hasn't caught on in the United States.)
To: marktwain
It sounds to me like Montana is starting to take the whole “shall not be infringed” a little more seriously then most states...and most politicians. The reporter on the other hand obviously doesn't care about such outmoded unfashionable things as the constitution. Almost every other sentence you can clearly see his disdain for the concept and I'm sure he thinks that he is “enlightened”. His patronizing arrogance towards the rights of the average man is hardly anything new...tyrants have been that way since the dawn of time.
3 posted on
04/06/2009 4:55:06 AM PDT by
Durus
(The People have abdicated our duties and anxiously hopes for just two things, "Bread and Circuses")
To: marktwain
"The Montana Shooting Sports Association wants the Legislature to pass a bill that has highly controversial provisions."
"controversial". Far from it! It's quite popular, and common sense.
4 posted on
04/06/2009 4:59:53 AM PDT by
Freedom4US
(l)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson