Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alter Kaker

Darwin worked on the same problems a Mendel, but his own theories led him to come upwith very different conclusions. Neo-Darwinism sought to reconcile the two but at the cost of clarity. It is a bit like Einstein difficulties with quantum theories, but more like the old necessity of abandoning Ptolemy’s cosmology because it got so complicated that it could no longer be useful. IAC, Mendel, not Darwin, deserves the title of of “ Copernicus of biology.”


8 posted on 03/30/2009 9:50:38 AM PDT by RobbyS (ECCE homo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: RobbyS
Darwin worked on the same problems a Mendel, but his own theories led him to come upwith very different conclusions. Neo-Darwinism sought to reconcile the two but at the cost of clarity.

I think they were looking at very different but overlapping issues. Darwin looked at the big picture and saw what had happened and is happening. Mendel looked at the very small scale and observed what happened. Mendel had no understanding of evolution, even though Mendellian genetics came to explain why and how evolution works.

12 posted on 03/30/2009 10:01:17 AM PDT by Alter Kaker (Gravitation is a theory, not a fact. It should be approached with an open mind...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson