Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mikey_1962

1) posted several times
2) Octopus fossils aren’t all that rare.
3) Octopus fossils aren’t really fossils, they’re more of a chemical image in the rock.


6 posted on 03/27/2009 4:32:06 PM PDT by xcamel (The urge to save humanity is always a false front for the urge to rule it. - H. L. Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: xcamel

A fossil is simply evidence of a former living thing. Even a footprint is a form of fossil: a “trace fossil.” Fossils do not have to be bones or other skeletal matter. They can be molds (cavities left when the actual organic remains decayed). They can be minerals deposited by chemical changes in the sediment as the organism decayed. And cephalopods (the group which includes octopi) have been around for about 500 million years, so a 95 million-year-old fossil which resembles living species is not shocking. The horseshoe crab has been around for about 200 million years with hardly any visible change.


7 posted on 03/27/2009 4:39:19 PM PDT by hellbender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson