Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iran's Air Defense Could Defend Against U.S. F-15s
Middle East Newsline ^ | March 23, 2009

Posted on 03/24/2009 9:55:43 AM PDT by Strategy

LONDON [MENL] -- Iran has been developing an air defense network that could defend against a U.S. attack, a report said.

A report by a leading defense researcher said Iran was assembling a Russian-origin air defense umbrella that could defeat attacks by the most modern Western aircraft.

The report, "Surviving the Modern Integrated Air defence System," said Iran has employed IADS technology that could cause huge losses in any U.S. air campaign.

(Excerpt) Read more at menewsline.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Israel
KEYWORDS: airforce; airstrikes; bho44; bhoiran; iran; iraq; israel; military; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last

1 posted on 03/24/2009 9:55:44 AM PDT by Strategy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Strategy

LOL ... keep believing it.


2 posted on 03/24/2009 9:57:44 AM PDT by mgc1122
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Strategy
Iran has been developing an air defense network that could defend against a U.S. attack for a few seconds.

There,I fixed it

3 posted on 03/24/2009 9:58:07 AM PDT by Robe (Rome did not create a great empire by talking, they did it by killing all those who opposed them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Strategy

So could Syria’s, as I recall.


4 posted on 03/24/2009 9:58:37 AM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Strategy

Like the vaunted Syrian air defense system?

It would work well if we just sent in a bunch of F-15s without any supporting aircraft. We don’t do that.

Radar suppression, anti-radiation missiles, AWACs, integrated data links. It isn’t WWII.


5 posted on 03/24/2009 9:58:43 AM PDT by MediaMole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Strategy

If this is true, it’s a good reason for the F-22 which the President wants to cancel


6 posted on 03/24/2009 9:59:23 AM PDT by RC2 (http://www.youtube.com/user/Funbobbasso)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Strategy

A good reason to build more F-22s.


7 posted on 03/24/2009 9:59:54 AM PDT by Prokopton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Strategy

So, we send in the B2s, F-117s and F22s first, then send in the F-15s and F-16s and F-18s and the Super Hornets.

Problem solved....

....oh and carpet bomb with B52s and B-1Bs too....

.....and don’t forget the F-111s


8 posted on 03/24/2009 10:00:15 AM PDT by Islander7 (If you want to anger conservatives, lie to them. If you want to anger liberals, tell them the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Strategy

wow you can defend against a platform thats been around since 72. Just like the Iraqi GPS scramblers. They activate them and we know just where to send the bombs.


9 posted on 03/24/2009 10:00:26 AM PDT by utherdoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Strategy
how good is it against cruise missiles and stealth bombers that will take out that defense long before the F-15’s show up?
10 posted on 03/24/2009 10:00:56 AM PDT by txroadkill (God Help Us-The Rats are in charge! And they aren't paying their taxes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Strategy

Is Baghdad Bob living in Iran now doing the Press releases?


11 posted on 03/24/2009 10:03:02 AM PDT by fish hawk (The Golden Calf you worship will not bail you out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Strategy

It sounds like Iran is buying more targets for first strike ambitions. Now we may have to use a few more peices of ordinance.

BTW - F-15s would not be the first strike platform. We have far more stealthy platforms to attack the air defense equipment of the enemy.

F-15s, F-18s would likely follow the F-22s, B-117s and B-2s along with the cruise missles. Air traffic control could be a problem. We don’t want our guys flying into one another as they crowd Iranian air space.


12 posted on 03/24/2009 10:05:21 AM PDT by Tenacious 1 (We may officially be too stupid to govern ourselves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Strategy

Who said we’d use F-15s?


13 posted on 03/24/2009 10:05:27 AM PDT by Uncle Miltie (A trillion here, a trillion there, and pretty soon you are talking about Zimbabwe money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Strategy
The real story: Report: Iran worried over Syrian air defense failure in IAF strike

Iran is concerned over the failure of Syria's air defense systems to detect the Israel Air Force non-stealth aircraft that reportedly carried out an attack inside Syria last month, the American weekly Aviation Week reported. According to the report, Israel was able to disrupt Syria's radar and air defense systems and render them ineffective during the IAF strike. The weekly maintained that Iran is especially concerned over the failure of Syria's Russian-made radar systems. Iran has used similar systems in the past, and is slated to purchase more radar equipment in a future deal worth $750 million. This equipment is apparently designated to protect Iran's nuclear facilities against attacks from the air.

14 posted on 03/24/2009 10:05:37 AM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Miltie

The F-15E Strike Eagle is the mainstay of the IAF.


15 posted on 03/24/2009 10:10:44 AM PDT by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Islander7

Someone told me the other day that all the B-52’s have been retired.. anyone know if this is true ???


16 posted on 03/24/2009 10:12:18 AM PDT by Robe (Rome did not create a great empire by talking, they did it by killing all those who opposed them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Islander7
we send in the B2s, F-117s

Not the F-117's bub. they've all been scrapped.


17 posted on 03/24/2009 10:14:02 AM PDT by CholeraJoe (So then my skinny date sez, "Does Lane Bryant sell designer jeans?" and that's why the boss hates me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Robe

Note to self.. Google is your friend.....
70+ Buff’s still inservice and predicted to stay so there till 2040


18 posted on 03/24/2009 10:15:38 AM PDT by Robe (Rome did not create a great empire by talking, they did it by killing all those who opposed them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Robe

Not true. The 5th Bomb Wing at Minot AFB, ND and 2nd Bomb Wing at Barksdale AFB, LA still fly them. The 28th at Ellsworth AFB, SD and the 7th at Dyess AFB, TX fly the B-1B. The 509th at Whiteman AFB, MO flies the B-2.


19 posted on 03/24/2009 10:17:33 AM PDT by CholeraJoe (So then my skinny date sez, "Does Lane Bryant sell designer jeans?" and that's why the boss hates me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Strategy

The article’s premise is true ONLY if it were operated by COMPETANT officers and men, however. That leaves Iran OUT.


20 posted on 03/24/2009 10:21:20 AM PDT by 2harddrive (...House a TOTAL Loss.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson