This blog post reads as if a high school kid wrote it. What does Cillizza cite, (answer: not one damn thing), to back up his allegations that it was Palin and her staff and not the congressional and senate republicans committees who were the cause of the "miscommunication or lack of communication" between the latter two and Palin?
As for her status of a nat'l figure being "undeserved" that statement is not only a lie it is ignorant and petty.
And what's all the mystery surrounding van Susteren's husband about? (real answer: nothing). It appears that John Coale is more than a tad more perceptive who is genuine and altruistic than Chris Cillizza could hope to be.
Cillizza writes about as intriguing and understandable as Robt Gibbs speaks.
