Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: little jeremiah
That he was legally adopted. LIke you don’t know what was meant.

I have a hard time keeping the birther conspiracy theories straight because there are so many of them and they often contradict each other.

So, there were two children in the marriage, little Barack and little Maya. Why would the documents say otherwise? Divorce papers listing the kids always list the kids from the previous marriages. That doesn't prove adoption, only that the kids were part of the household. Lolo was on the hook.

Of course, the whole issue is meaningless, as US law and State Dept policy is explicit on the fact that parents can't renounce a child's citizenship. Adoption wouldn't have changed that.

320 posted on 03/17/2009 4:39:27 PM PDT by Bubba Ho-Tep ("More weight!"--Giles Corey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 302 | View Replies ]


To: Bubba Ho-Tep

I know you are supporting the efforts of those who have filed court cases and have written to your local papers and the white house imploring Obama to stop the guilty behavior and show that all of us conspiracy theorists are just so many idiots.


321 posted on 03/17/2009 4:41:20 PM PDT by nufsed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 320 | View Replies ]

To: Bubba Ho-Tep

There are mnay interesting things to be learned about 0bama from various documents, and since he has sanitized and/or hidden so many of them, there isn’t much to work with. Of course, if he were actually “transparent” as he promised, we’d all know his nationality and citizenship status.


345 posted on 03/17/2009 6:01:32 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Asato Ma Sad Gama Tamasi Ma Jyotir Gama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 320 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson