Posted on 03/16/2009 12:40:17 PM PDT by VinL
Edited on 03/16/2009 12:42:02 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
FRee Republic Member Opinion
Thompson 66.8% 1,658 - WINNER
Romney 12.7% 315
Post Election Rasmussen poll - GOP voters:
Palin -- 64% - WINNER
Huckabee -- 12%
Romney -- 11%
SUMMARY:
GOP candidate backstabber Romney: Make all the promises you have to...
Yeah. So?
What is it about RINO menaces you find so alluring, Norm ?
“Yep. Can’t we try a conservative next time around? We haven’t had one since Reagan. “
And before him, Coolidge! If we’re only have good Presidents every 50 years that doesn’t bode well.
CRIST?
LOL!
Norman Norman Norman...
You spend time trying to sell your boy as a Conservative then pin his success to Crist?
Does the term “frying pan into the fire” mean anything to you?
I never tried to sell McCain as an orthodox conservative. I did put him forth as relatively right-of-center, which he was/is.
The fact is Crist probably delivered Florida for McCain with his last minute endorsement (polls showed the Crist endorsement had significant clout among undecided GOP primary voters). Had Romney won Florida I think he would’ve been the favorite for the nomination from that point out.
Of the several posts I have made on this thread only in one (60) do I offer mild praise for Romney.
So, now that I've answered that let's go back to the point of my post 52 which you are avoiding - what do you find so difficult in posting the name "Mitt Romney"?
This gets better and better...
65 should be for you...
I already read and responded to 65.
I was the keeper of the McCain ping list for 2008. It was no secret and frankly if you didn’t know that you weren’t paying attention.
I think I am glad I wasn’t...
And then you jump to Mitt...
Fitting I guess...
Sorry, I lost track...
Disbelief does that o me...
I hate to continue this conversation but I think this needs to be clarified. I did not “jump to Mitt.” But I do not see anyone else out there who, as both a former governer and CEO, who has any comparable economic credentials in this current mess.
That’s not an answer, Norm. Why do you love these liberal RINO menaces ?
Why don’t you look up the thousands of prior discussions on this dead-horse and you’ll find the response to this debunked talking point. But what I find so ridiculous is that you bots (and yup, Norm, you’ve become a bot since you insist on taking up his defense and spewing the same talking points and wasting more of JimRob’s bandwith) refuse to distinguish between holding an office or position vs. success while holding an office or position. What part of “epic fail” are you psychologically incapable of accepting as the reality ?
Norm lecturing on this is a hoot. We're supposed to remember this absolutely, yet he conveniently ignored the thousands of threads exposing the Myth of Slick Willard and is trying to rehash and reenact the beating of a dead horse that has already disintegrated to dust.
I can see why you would hate to continue...
Well there are different rules for Moderates on FR you see...
Wow. Just wow. You did it again. You dodged my question for the second time with another red herring question. I won’t bother to ask again. Hats off to you.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.