Replies

Leo is like a savant. He can read 10 books on the law and remember everything verbatim. He’s one of those extremely intelligent people that becomes an introvert when the narrow-minded real world can’t understand them.

I thought he was a bit paranoid too, until I realized those types of people do exist. They’re geniuses.

You really can’t blame someone in that position for a being paranoid. Think about it if it were you, alone, going to Washington after all those stumbling blocks in the NJ court. The outside world becomes a crazy place and you know what? It is. You haven’t slept in days and probably only hours in weeks. You probably haven’t eaten a decent meal either. It has to have an affect. Especially when the media is laughing at you, on TV, with a jerk that thinks he’s special because he runs a SCOTUS blog and is so ignorant of history it’s not even funny. But then again, so is the audience you’re talking to, so who is going to look at it from Leo’s side when the media is out to get you and they were.

The main thing here is that Leo has a good guy to take that pressure off of him this time. Apuzzo doesn’t strike me as the type who is going to put up with the media’s crap. Together, they should make a good team. I think we should support them. A suit of thousands of plaintiffs has been demanded for how long? Here’s your chance boys and girls. Put up or shut up.

Well, we know Thomas and Scalia for sure aren’t afraid to decide the issue. Alito was a no-show at the SCOTUS tea party. It’s Kennedy and the others that are the wusses.

I’m surprised at Ginsburg. She’s supposed to be the one who is so well-versed in English common law. She knows Obama isn’t eligible. She should do the right thing and tell the people what the law said at the time, because I’m sure she above all of them, knows the truth. (I read up a lot about her)

Kennedy and the rest of the dissenters probably aren’t that smart. Souter, after Bush v. Gore, almost left the bench. He can’t handle anything, let alone get involved with settling a dispute over asses contesting “dingy marks” on ballots. “Oh I think this one has a dingy on it, but maybe not.” What a bunch of jerks. Then they wonder WHY it went to the Supreme Court? You had a choice. Let idiots like that settle it (which they never would have) or give it the Supreme Court where it belongs and tell the jackasses to knock off the nonsense. All Souter wants to hear is the same old cases he’s been granting certiorari for since he got in there. He dismisses everything else, not just this stuff. Too hard for him, plus he threatened to quit when he was forced to handle something out of the ordinary. LOL

BUT! Remember this, too. No one has approached the Supreme Court in accordance with the Supreme Court Rules yet. Donofrio couldn’t supply the Writ of Certiorari. He had just renewed his license. He needed 2 years of current practice. Didn’t have it. Then he needed to apply to the D.C. bar. All an impossibility, so he thought up McCarthy as a way in and tried to say, “Hey, you did it for Bush v. Gore, do it for me.” It was a gamble that he lost by himself. He probably couldn’t afford a D.C. bar attorney and he refused to accept any money.

Berg did file the Writ in accordance with the Rules of Court. But he lacked standing in district court. Remember, he was going in on a birth certificate and relying on grandma’s taped conversation as his evidence. First of all, she wasn’t under oath and she changed her story and said he was born in the U.S., after she said he was born in Kenya. Not exactly what we needed.

Then we saw Cort Wrotnowski who Leo tried to help, but it was the same deal - no condition where they could supply the writ.

Orly Taitz copied them and even though she COULD have followed the rules, having obtained a D.C. bar license, didn’t even bother doing it! Figure that one out. LOL!