To: SJackson
obama nominated as his science advisor a man who wrote this?????
“Holdren and the Ehrlichs maintained “there exists ample authority under which population growth could be regulated.” Hiding behind the passive voice, they note, “it has been concluded that compulsory population-control laws, even including laws requiring compulsory abortion, could be sustained under the existing constitution if the population crisis became sufficiently severe to endanger the society.” (Emphasis added.) To underscore they mean business, they conclude, “If some individuals contribute to general social deterioration by overproducing children, and if the need is compelling, they can be required by law to exercise reproductive responsibility” (pp. 837-838). Moreover, if the United States government refuses to take proper measures, they authorize the United Nations to take compelling force.”
2 posted on
02/27/2009 5:41:44 AM PST by
silverleaf
(Freedom's just another word for "nothing left to lose")
To: silverleaf
Woe to the catholics who voted for obama.
3 posted on
02/27/2009 5:45:26 AM PST by
x_plus_one
(A thousand suckers are born every minute. They are the Obamacracy.)
To: silverleaf
BHO himself is supportive of witholding life saving medical aid from an unwanted living baby, we shouldn't be surprised he'd appoint someone who would advocate mandatory abortion. Wonder if BHO asked him just what groups overbreed out of marriage, thus contributing to the downfall of society? Perhaps he'll invite Eric Holder over and have a discussion of a topic that I suspect revolves around race. And I doubt he's advocating the use of compelling force against the UK and Iceland. Africa, we're here to help you!
9 posted on
02/27/2009 6:03:42 AM PST by
SJackson
(a tax cut is non-targetedÂ…no guaranteeÂ…theyÂ’re free to invest anywhere that they want, J Kerry)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson