Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"Brain Death" as Criteria for Organ Donation is a "Deception": Bereaved Mother
LifeSiteNews ^ | 2/23/09 | Hilary White

Posted on 02/23/2009 3:33:18 PM PST by wagglebee

ROME, February 23, 2009 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Bernice Jones came to Rome last week to tell the world that doctors killed her son by removing his organs. "Brain death is not death" and "organ donation is very deceptive," the bereaved mother told LifeSiteNews.com in an interview on Thursday.

Mrs. Jones was attending an international conference on the dangers of so-called "brain death" criteria and related her experience of losing her son, Brandon, who was declared "brain dead" and used as an organ donor.

"Families are led to believe that their loved ones are dead," Jones told LSN, "but in fact they are alive. You must be alive to be a vital organ donor." Families, she said, are being deceived by doctors and hospital administrators, "by everyone who is involved in organ transplantation." The declaration of brain death "is a deception, a violent deception, that your loved one is dead."

Jones described what she characterized as a betrayal of principle by medical professionals at a hospital in their home state of Washington, whose priority she argued is no longer the care of the patient at hand but the procurement of organs for transplants. Although she declined to name the hospital, she said, "It happens at all hospitals."

Nine years ago, Mrs. Jones's son suffered an accidental gunshot wound to the head and was declared "brain dead" upon arrival at the hospital. He was immediately prepared for the removal of his organs.

Mrs. Jones said, "While my family and I thought that our son was being treated for his well-being, to preserve and protect his life, he was not, he was being treated to be an organ donor."

"His vital organs were being procured not for his benefit but to benefit someone else."

24 hours after the family was told Brandon was dead, Mrs. Jones had an intuition that her son was still alive. Later investigation revealed that the hospital had told the family her son was "brain dead" but, without the family's knowledge, had kept him alive on a respirator for 20 hours while flooding his body with fluids and drugs in preparation for what his mother described as a live "dissection" that brought about his death.

Legal consent, she said, was obtained while the family was in deep shock over the accident. Jones's husband signed the consent forms over her objections and the family, still in shock, was told to go home. During their time at the hospital, the family was introduced to a woman whom doctors referred to as an "organ procurement agent." This woman used what Mrs. Jones described as a standard "script," speaking soothingly to the family about Brandon's altruism and desire to help others, to induce them to sign the consent forms, copies of which were not given to the family.

Mrs. Jones was later to learn that these procedures are standard for organ retrieval. "All of the organ donor families I have spoken to received the same script," she said. Organ procurement officials approach the family when they are at their most vulnerable, she said. "It's always when you're not mentally, emotionally capable" of making an informed decision.

Prior to obtaining his organs, Brandon was given paralysing drugs to keep him from moving. He was anesthetised during the removal process. Mrs. Jones said that the diagnosis of brain death is a sham. "If he is supposed to be dead, why does he need paralysing drugs to keep him from moving? Why does he need anesthesia?"

Brandon Jones was given, without his family's consent, what is called an "apnea test" by doctors, to determine brain death. Doctors remove the ventilator for two minutes from a patient who requires assistance breathing. The heart rate decreases and after two minutes without oxygen, "brain death" is declared.

The apnea test as a diagnostic tool was specifically denounced at the conference as unethical by Dr. Cicero Coimbra, a neurologist from Sao Paolo, Brazil. The test, he said, which cuts off oxygen to the brain, will bring about severe, irreversible brain damage in patients who, with proper care, would otherwise have had a good chance of survival.

Mrs. Jones believes doctors who are motivated by the desire to obtain organs use the apnea test knowing that it will induce severe brain damage while the body is prepared for organ removal.

Despite the harm it does, the apnea test, she said, is administered without the family's consent. "We were in with our son, and they told us to leave the room, that they had to perform a test. They did not ask permission to do this."

"If a family was made aware of what an apnea test consists of, no family member would ever consent to this."

She described what happened to her son: "For two minutes they took the ventilator away from him. They wait for the pulse to go down but the heart continues to beat. Then they put the ventilator back on. Now, in this two-minute timeframe, they pronounce the patient dead.

"Before they put them back on the ventilator they pronounce the patient dead. It's a prerequisite to being able to declare a legal but fictional death." This "death" is what she has described as a "convenience death, invented to schedule and regulate the actual time of real death."

Brandon died, she claimed, while his organs, including his still-beating heart, were removed in surgery. "Our son had been dissected alive and in doing so, killed."

Mrs. Jones is the founder of an organisation of parents and families who have undergone this experience and which is dedicated to bringing to the public eye the danger of the "brain death" criteria. The Life Guardian Foundation is dedicated to educating the public that "life of the human person is a gift."

The group calls it "irreverent" to use terms such as "brain dead," "vegetative state," "terminal condition," and "imminent danger of death." "Such designations have been proposed and are actively used for the sole purpose of demeaning and shortening life, as well as to hasten the death of a human person."

Mrs. Jones said that in her research after her son's death that "there is no scientific validation for 'brain death'. Absolutely none, whatsoever."

Read related LifeSiteNews.com coverage:

The Demise of "Brain Death": Commentary by Dr. Paul A. Byrne, M.D.
http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2008/sep/08091803.html



TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: braindeath; moralabsolutes; organharvesting; prolife
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last
To: wagglebee
"Nine years ago, Mrs. Jones's son suffered an accidental gunshot wound to the head and was declared "brain dead" upon arrival at the hospital."

Were the brains transported in the ambulance with the patient, or were they shipped later after they were collected from the walls, floor, ect...

41 posted on 02/23/2009 4:47:16 PM PST by spunkets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spunkets
"Were the brains transported in the ambulance with the patient, or were they shipped later after they were collected from the walls, floor, ect... "

The patient was asked these questions, but his answers appeared to be somewhat scatter-brained.

42 posted on 02/23/2009 4:49:52 PM PST by gorush (History repeats itself because human nature is static)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Netizen
Why would they approach the family for organ donation if they didn’t think he was brain dead?

I wasn't there. You'll have to ask someone closer to the event.

43 posted on 02/23/2009 4:50:03 PM PST by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Myrddin

You said he apparently wasn’t brain dead, so I thought you knew.


44 posted on 02/23/2009 4:52:34 PM PST by Netizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Netizen
You said he apparently wasn’t brain dead, so I thought you knew.

I didn't think it required elaboration when the original post said "he walked out of the hospital".

45 posted on 02/23/2009 4:56:15 PM PST by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Jaidyn
She was artificially kept alive...

I would offer a point of clarification here. Just like in the story above where the mother makes the mistake of saying that her son "was kept alive" after brain death. It's just not quite accurate. The body isn't "alive" other than the sense that they are artificially keeping fluids flowing and organs mechanically functioning so they don't start to decompose

before they can be transplanted. But if the brain is dead, they're dead.

46 posted on 02/23/2009 4:58:30 PM PST by Ramius (Personally, I give us... one chance in three. More tea?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Ramius
She was artificially kept alive... I would offer a point of clarification here. Just like in the story above where the mother makes the mistake of saying that her son "was kept alive" after brain death. It's just not quite accurate. The body isn't "alive" other than the sense that they are artificially keeping fluids flowing and organs mechanically functioning so they don't start to decompose before they can be transplanted. But if the brain is dead, they're dead.

Of course, she was dead, but my using the term "artificially kept alive" meant she was dead, but as you said, kept mechanically functioning to keep ready for the organ removal.

47 posted on 02/23/2009 5:03:00 PM PST by Jaidyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Gondring

Thirty-five years ago.


48 posted on 02/23/2009 5:17:10 PM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Netizen

That is actually fairly common. If they feel a patient has a good chance of not recovering they may ask the family so they are prepared in the event they do die. It’s better than waiting until it may be to late.


49 posted on 02/23/2009 5:30:00 PM PST by SlapHappyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Having been through the transplant process, a person is not just declared “brain dead” so that the donor procurement agency can get some organs. It is a set protocol that has rigid standards, and the medical declaration is not left to 1 professional. When people make accusations that physicians purposely kill a patient to get organs, they are speaking from ignorance (although there may be ISOLATED cases that this occurs; it is NOT the norm).

Personally, my 16 year old donor was on life support for 2 weeks before being declared brain dead. Harvesting organs isn’t something that can be done at the drop of a hat. They have testing that must be done on the potential donor, recipients lined up AND in the case of a kidney, there is antibody testing that must be done between donor and recipient blood, they must coordinate transportation of the various organs (not all of the organs go to the same facility)....This article makes it seem as though he was rolled in to the ER, declared brain dead, and then taken to the OR to harvest his organs. I can guarantee you that this is NOT what happened.


50 posted on 02/23/2009 5:50:29 PM PST by Born Conservative (Bohicaville: http://bohicaville.wordpress.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
My EMT text book from ten years ago offerd a helpful hint that one should actually try to keep a person alive, even if they had signed an organ donor card. Shocked me to think that anyone would think otherwise, and I haven't signed such a card since.

Some Doctors just want to do the most good, and if five others may live by one not living, well...if Doctors can't play God then who can? And injecting a few million dollars into the medical system, nah, that isn't tempting either. Not saying that all organ donation is bad or that all transplant Doctors are evil, but this area of medicine should be under the utmost scrutiny.

51 posted on 02/23/2009 5:52:40 PM PST by Jacob Morgan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee; informavoracious; larose; RJR_fan; Prospero; Conservative Vermont Vet; ...
+

Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:

Add me / Remove me

Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of interest.

Obama Says A Baby Is A Punishment

Obama: “If they make a mistake, I don’t want them punished with a baby.”

52 posted on 02/23/2009 5:53:59 PM PST by narses (http://www.theobamadisaster.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jacob Morgan
Not saying that all organ donation is bad or that all transplant Doctors are evil, but this area of medicine should be under the utmost scrutiny.

I totally agree.

53 posted on 02/23/2009 5:54:00 PM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Disgusting. It was homicide.


54 posted on 02/23/2009 6:22:42 PM PST by HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

I have serious reservations about organ donation, and they have very little to do with the process of determining if death has occurred or not.

Supposing I am told that one of my organs is failing, and my only chance to live is through an organ donation. To agree to and hope for that donation means that I am actively desiring the death of a healthy person who is living and breathing at this moment. There is no way I can morally agree to such a thing. None.

I’ve also written on my driver’s license that I do not consent to be an organ donor.


55 posted on 02/23/2009 8:32:52 PM PST by exDemMom (Now that I've finally accepted that I'm living a bad hair life, I'm more at peace with the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ga medic

Probably true, but there was an AP video of a woman who died, can’t remember if her brain heart or both flatlined. I’ll never be able to find it now. There’s another woman (my son’s business partner’s mother) who had a stroke and doctors gave her 1 in 1 billion chance she would come out of a coma. I know a coma is different, and don’t know what her EEG read, but I know they were at the point to decide. Well, the doctor was wrong, and she came out of it but sadly will never be the same, can still enjoy and recognize people though.


56 posted on 02/23/2009 8:36:10 PM PST by Aliska
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Steven Drake of “NotDeadYet” reported that Nursing 2009
has recently rather to his surprise, published an article
by one RN relating her change of view on organ donation.
The same article also includes a really important paragraph
about a Uniform Donation Act (that’s not the exact title)
which says that hospitals may, IIRC, proceed with removal
after “reasonable attempts” to contact the next of kin.
I should look it up and quote exactly, but being on lynx
here I can’t cut and paste to FR.


57 posted on 02/24/2009 12:44:37 AM PST by cycjec
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

I’d like to remind one and all of Chris Borthwick’s
devastating analysis of “PVS” or “vegetative state”
which antedating the recent discoveries of brain activity
(the famous “tennis playing” case ) I have a vicnet.au
URL for that, as well as others.


58 posted on 02/24/2009 12:48:31 AM PST by cycjec
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Myrddin

Look at http://www.notdeadyet.org for a lead to
data on that.


59 posted on 02/24/2009 12:50:13 AM PST by cycjec
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Myrddin

You are 100% correct (Terri was murdered) Her “condition”
whatever it was, was not brain death (by any definition)
since she was admitted by one and all to be breathing
without intervention As I’m sure you have noticed, some
ppl conflate the 2 issues.


60 posted on 02/24/2009 12:53:38 AM PST by cycjec
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson