Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fabian; enter the dragon; whatisthetruth; libertarian27; AuntB; johnny7; Dustbunny; unkus; ...
“I’ve said repeatedly on my national radio show that Barack Obama was elected because of white guilt and black racism. The majority of whites voted for Obama to prove once and for all that they don’t have racial hang-ups. Ninety-six percent of blacks voted for him because of his race.

THANKS

2 posted on 02/23/2009 7:24:47 AM PST by abigail2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: abigail2

And 100% of all of us are going broke because of it...

Idiots...


4 posted on 02/23/2009 7:27:48 AM PST by ejonesie22 (Stupidity has an expiration date 1-20-2013 *(Thanks Nana))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: abigail2

If monkeys could vote he’d get 96% of that group as well.


5 posted on 02/23/2009 7:28:28 AM PST by DogBarkTree (Sometimes you have to let it go in order to get a Grip.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: rebuildus; NewDestiny; GOP Poet; whatisthetruth; pankot; unkus; johnny7; Dustbunny; blackie; ...

9 posted on 02/23/2009 7:33:23 AM PST by abigail2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: abigail2
Let us assume as true that which is undeniably untrue: the cartoon was racist.

Even racist speech is free speech. Do we really want to intimidate the press out of free speech, even racist speech, by invoking the full weight of the federal government to intimidate the utterer of the speech? Do we really want to chill free speech, even racist speech, at this price?

Do we really want the government with its monopoly of power and violence, with all its great ability to intimidate through tax and licensing regulations, to be at the irresponsible disposition of the likes of Reverend Sharpton? Are we not thereby empowering Sharpton to engage in legalized extortion? Are we sure that we can control the likes of Reverend Sharpton and protect not just the press but every private citizen? I cannot invoke the criminal and quasi criminal apparatus of the federal, state, and local governments whenever I am aggrieved, can you?

Should we let a private citizen of dubious motivation define for the rest of the world what is free speech and what is not, what is politically correct and what is not, what should bring down government upon us? Even if the cartoon were racist-and it is not-a civilized and lawful society should require that that determination not be made by some race baiter off the street but only by lawful authorities whose jurisdiction is invoked when and only when there is reasonable cause to believe that a crime has been committed and the defendant, committed the crime.

I can think of no more pernicious practice entering into our criminal justice system than to permit and extortionist like Reverend Sharpton to precipitate criminal investigation when no crime has been committed, merely because the Reverend believes that the object of his agitation has committed racism.


19 posted on 02/23/2009 7:41:00 AM PST by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: abigail2

it was really pathetic to see Sharpton blathering like a baffoon today about something so obviously wrong. He is a dangerous and wicked man.


38 posted on 02/23/2009 10:07:18 PM PST by fabian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson