Posted on 02/19/2009 6:07:46 PM PST by Publius
Paul Volcker, the former US Federal Reserve Board chairman who is now a member of President Barack Obama's advisory team on the economy, spoke in Toronto recently as part of the Grano Speakers series.
His topic, of course, was the extent of the crisis facing the US, and particularly what brought it about. (Solving it is another issue). He is the latest to suggest Canada is in far better shape, and has been far better served by the structure of its banking system, than the US, Europe and other regions.
"Its interesting that what Im arguing for looks more like the Canadian system than the American system," Volker said, pointing to strong banks focused on traditional commercial banking practices -- taking in money and providing credit -- that operate separately from the high-risk financial highwire acts that brought down Wall Street, and for which Volker has little respect.
Here is the speech in full:
I really feel a sense of profound disappointment coming up here. We are having a great financial problem around the world. And finance doesnt work without some sense of trust and confidence and people meaning what they say. You take their oral word and their written word as a sign that their intentions will be carried out..
(Excerpt) Read more at network.nationalpost.com ...
Canada has a tiny fraction of the selection of banks here, and 30 year mortgages, a staple here, are almost unheard of. You typically have to finance in small chunks.
Not community reinvestment?
Welcome to the club.
I've never seen an administration so bent on telling Americans how much they suck.
I seem to recall Reagan being a cheerleader for the US.
Ping.
“...Grano Speakers series”
As in, take it with a Gano salt???
What's the typical term there?
...Grano Speakers series
As in, take it with a GRANO salt???
Canada probably doesnt have the amount of deadbeats buying McMansions they cant pay for, and they didnt have Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinon encouraging these dead beats.
Thier biggest asset is that they dont have Barney Frank eother.
5 years is typical.
7 and 10 year are available at a higher rate.
Is there somewhere on the web that breaks down how mortgage instruments operate in different countries? 30 year fixed is a recent (WWII) phenomenon, I’m sure of that, and rare outside America? Even here it used to be say, 50 percent down prior to the depression era, and renewed every 6 months, callable at any time. I remember reading that Mexico has maybe 30 or 40 thousand mortgages (not a typo) in the entire country!
Thanks for the post, Publius.
Odumbo is the anti-Reagan. All he can do is talk about how much everything sucks. Reagan recognised that the US faced challenges, but that the American people could meet any challenge with resolve and can-do spirit.
Compared to Zero, Clinton was a cheerleader for the US.
The majority pay off their mortage in 5 years?
I mean “mortgage”.
25 or 30 year amortization, 5-year term is typical
I see.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.