Skip to comments.
Charges May Not Come in Eluana Englaro Case, Medical Hearing on Thursday
Life News ^
| 2/10/09
| Steven Ertelt
Posted on 02/10/2009 4:13:35 PM PST by wagglebee
Rome, Italy (LifeNews.com) -- Local authorities and officials in the Udine region of Italy are unsure whether the medical staff who removed Eluana Englaro's feeding tube will face any hearings or charges in connection with her euthanasia death. Englaro died on Monday after four days of starvation and dehydration.
Her death was ordered by an Italian appeals court after her father Beppino had spent the better part of a decade fighting to take her life.
Englaro was expected to live two weeks but she succumbed to the starvation after only four days.
Prior to the removal of her feeding tube, national officials indicated they would prosecute the staff of any medical center that would remove it and cause her death.
On Tuesday, in the chaotic fallout from Englaro's death, the Udine prosecutor's office has ordered an autopsy on Englaro's body.
Public prosecutor in nearby Trieste, Beniamino Deidda, told the Italian news agency ANSA, ''For the moment we have no news from the commission of any crime."
Meanwhile, the Udine branch of the Italian Medical Association is planning a hearing on Thursday to establish whether disciplinary proceedings should go ahead for the medical team that removed her feeding tube.
Eluana's anesthetist, Amato De Monte, will appear before the panel on Thursday and the rest of the medical team will also be called upon to appear at some point.
''It's absolutely too early to express any opinion or judgement'', Udine branch president Luigi Conte told ANSA.
De Monte said he had "nothing to hide" and that he would go over the autopsy results with the medical association committee.
Health Undersecretary Eugenia Roccella has accused the medical team of removing Eluana's feeding tube three days early. The plan had been to gradually deprive her of food and water but Roccella believes all nutrition may have been stopped on Friday, leading to her premature death.
''I'm not making subtle accusations or insinuations,'' she said. ''I'm just saying that the doctors did not apply the protocol that had initially been decided upon."
That Englaro died prior to the time most observers expected has been a concern for pro-life advocates who have followed the case.
TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: eluanaenglaro; euthanasia; moralabsolutes; prolife
Health Undersecretary Eugenia Roccella has accused the medical team of removing Eluana's feeding tube three days early. They were afraid that the government would change the law and stop Eluana's murder.
1
posted on
02/10/2009 4:13:35 PM PST
by
wagglebee
To: cgk; Coleus; cpforlife.org; narses; Salvation; 8mmMauser
2
posted on
02/10/2009 4:14:13 PM PST
by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: 185JHP; 230FMJ; 50mm; 69ConvertibleFirebird; Aleighanne; Alexander Rubin; ...
3
posted on
02/10/2009 4:14:46 PM PST
by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: wagglebee
How long was she brain dead?
How long is enough?
One year? Just asking.
4
posted on
02/10/2009 4:32:49 PM PST
by
Darwin Fish
(God invented evolution. Man invented religion.)
To: Darwin Fish
How long was she brain dead? She wasn't.
5
posted on
02/10/2009 4:38:12 PM PST
by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: wagglebee
OK, how long was she in a “persistent vegetative state on January 18, 1992” oops quoted from somewhere.
So let me rephrase that: How long is being in a PVS long enough?
6
posted on
02/10/2009 4:44:43 PM PST
by
Darwin Fish
(God invented evolution. Man invented religion.)
To: Darwin Fish
So let me rephrase that: How long is being in a PVS long enough? How about until she dies a NATURAL DEATH?
7
posted on
02/10/2009 4:51:16 PM PST
by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: Darwin Fish
Perhaps you should read these:
8
posted on
02/10/2009 4:57:20 PM PST
by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: All
9
posted on
02/10/2009 5:24:41 PM PST
by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: wagglebee
So let me get this straight: If you were in a car accident, or something, and the doctors told your family you were in a PVS, your will is to be kept alive forever? For as long as is possible?
In a hospital bed, you can keep a body alive for almost forever, if brain death is all that is wrong.
Mine says one month.
I would not burden my family that way, and I think it is torture for the vegetable (pVs).
10
posted on
02/10/2009 5:25:04 PM PST
by
Darwin Fish
(God invented evolution. Man invented religion.)
To: Darwin Fish
Once again, we ARE NOT talking about brain death, we are talking about a disability. A person who is brain dead CANNOT breathe on their own and their heart WILL NOT beat on its own.
Eluana was perfectly healthy prior to last Friday:
What other disabilities merit death by your standards?
I notice that you IGNORED the numerous threads I gave you links to about people recovering from PVS.
11
posted on
02/10/2009 5:35:33 PM PST
by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: wagglebee
OK, let me rephrase it:
So let me get this straight: If you were in a car accident, or something, and the doctors told your family you were in a PVS, your will is to be kept alive forever? For as long as is possible?
In a hospital bed, you can keep a body alive for almost forever, if PVS is all that is wrong.
Mine says one month.
I would not burden my family that way, and I think it is torture for the vegetable (pVs).
12
posted on
02/10/2009 6:09:04 PM PST
by
Darwin Fish
(God invented evolution. Man invented religion.)
To: Darwin Fish; wagglebee
Where did you get the idea that brain injuries make it possible for someone to live forever?
13
posted on
02/10/2009 6:17:30 PM PST
by
BykrBayb
(May God have mercy on our souls. ~ Þ)
To: Darwin Fish
"PVS" is the invention of "quality of life" propagandists. See e.g. the Times of London September 2006 for research showing the many so-called "PVS" patients can hear and understand others. This was once the standard understanding wrt persons with impaired communications, even those under anesthesia or comatose. Read Chris Borthwick's articles (they should be at vicnet.au) on the history of this appalling "diagnosis."
More to come
14
posted on
02/11/2009 11:38:43 AM PST
by
cycjec
To: wagglebee
An excellent compilation.
15
posted on
02/11/2009 11:39:53 AM PST
by
cycjec
To: cycjec
A footnote to my earlier post (and to wagglebee’s better
reply): Sometimes capable, otherwise reliable doctors
find it necessary to distinguish Terri’s (and perhaps now
in Italy, Eluana’s) case from those they are currently
treating. I can only guess at their motives. I did hear
this done once, at a presentation at a local library about
persons returning to consciousness. I will say the MD
present (there was a neuroscientist and others) probably
had his reasons. That doesn’t mean any of us should take
such statements seriously.
16
posted on
02/11/2009 11:44:31 AM PST
by
cycjec
To: cycjec
Thanks for your excellent posts on this thread!
17
posted on
02/11/2009 2:54:27 PM PST
by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson