Several problems for you, yes. You asked me to show you a godless liberal who supported teaching creationism, and now you balk that you meant only in America?
Whatever point you were trying to make by asking the question has obviously been done away with.
Oh I see...so PC creationism taught by godless liberals counts when they teach anything but creationism...just some gobbledygook PC gibberish no one in their right mind could possibly understand or recognize as creationism?
Uh-huh...yeah...
yup, still several problems for me, AND anyone that’s not a brainwashed cultist that’s been on this side of the debate, yeah!!
Sheesh, you not only want it both ways...you want it every conceivable way and really don’t know anything else!!
Kind of like scientists speak for science only when they agree with your brand of science...
OR interjecting the Pope into an argument you demand religion not be interjected into...
and now the godless liberal PC creation brand actually counts as creation?
I meant creationism period, but incidentally the pre-PC, pre-NEA, pre-gobbledeygook brand of Christian American creationism IS my idea of creationism, as I’m not familiar with anything else.
Not Islam.
Not liberal PC versions.
Not purple spaghetti monsters.
Not Euroweenie...