Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/09/2009 2:53:21 AM PST by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Cindy
...a starvation diet under the Bush Administration...

...where does one even begin?

Good thing we dumped all those free-spending RINOs and that drunken sailor Bush...


2 posted on 02/09/2009 3:01:07 AM PST by ExGeeEye (COTUS 2A should be the USA's ONLY gun law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cindy

I heard the comment. She said it with a straight face. Once again prooves the true adgenda of Democrats. Socialism. Similar to Maxine Waters slip. They only care about saving Government jobs. Not us. I am for a starvation diet for the government.


4 posted on 02/09/2009 3:06:19 AM PST by screaminsunshine (f)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cindy

Yep, and pass that stimulus bill, and I will do everything within my power to put Federal Tax Revenues collected on a starvation diet, and then we’ll see how the debt-to-income ratio looks


5 posted on 02/09/2009 3:07:42 AM PST by Son House (Limbaugh's Bipartisan Economic Stimulus Plan is offering Mr. Øbama an OUT from terrible legislation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cindy

Better the Federal Government than Terri Schaivo.

Would that she had lived and “IT” had died.


7 posted on 02/09/2009 3:08:31 AM PST by shibumi (By the Authority of Hung Mung, Patron of Chaos and Keeper of The Sacred Chao)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cindy
Is it possible that McCaskill is even dumber than Pelosi? I am so disappointed in the people from Missouri, I used to think they had more common sense than most of the USA.
8 posted on 02/09/2009 3:09:00 AM PST by Aussiebabe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cindy
Sen. Claire McCaskill (D.-Mo.) said yesterday that some of the spending in the $819-billion stimulus passed by the House of Representatives last week represented important federal spending priorities needed to “make-up for a starvation diet under the Bush Administration.”

LOL! Methinks it would be way cool to live in her parallel dimension.

Sheesh.

5.56mm

10 posted on 02/09/2009 3:12:06 AM PST by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cindy
And is there any wonder why the country has become and economic wreck...

It can all be laid at the feet of the voter.

Voters elect economic retards and you end up with a retarded economy...

11 posted on 02/09/2009 3:16:42 AM PST by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cindy
Starvation is so sad - especially when it's federal bureaucrats who starve:

1990 $1,253,130,000,000
1991 $1,324,331,000,000
1992 $1,381,649,000,000
1993 $1,381,649,000,000
1994 $1,461,907,000,000
1995 $1,515,884,000,000
1996 $1,560,608,000,000
1997 $1,601,307,000,000
1998 $1,652,685,000,000
1999 $1,702,035,000,000
2000 $1,789,216,000,000
2001 $1,863,190,000,000
2002 $2,011,153,000,000
2003 $2,160,117,000,000
2004 $2,293,006,000,000
2005 $2,472,205,000,000
2006 $2,655,435,000,000
2007 $2,730,241,000,000
2008 $2,931,222,000,000
2009 $3,107,355,000,000

12 posted on 02/09/2009 3:19:58 AM PST by MathDoc (If there ever was a time that Obama looked like an amateur, itÂ’s right now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cindy

You just don’t understand. It is the responsibility of those who work hard and earn money to give ALL of their money to those who don’t work.


13 posted on 02/09/2009 3:21:34 AM PST by NoControllingLegalAuthority
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cindy; John Semmens

I was looking for John Semmens’ tagline here ... unfortunately, truth is stranger (and more idiotic) than fiction.


14 posted on 02/09/2009 3:23:16 AM PST by tx_eggman (I own two rare photos. Houdini as he locks his keys in his car and Norman Rockwell beating a child.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cindy
‘Starvation Diet’

Yeah, right!

16 posted on 02/09/2009 3:25:57 AM PST by faux_hog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cindy
(CNSNews.com) - Sen. Claire McCaskill (D.-Mo.) said yesterday that some of the spending in the $819-billion stimulus passed by the House of Representatives last week represented important federal spending priorities needed to “make-up for a starvation diet under the Bush Administration.”

Here we have another Neo-Marxist with no clue of basic economic theory and a proponent of putting forth proven failed policies that have bankrupt nation after nation that tried it. I wonder if she tried to operate a lemonade stand when she was little?

17 posted on 02/09/2009 3:26:46 AM PST by olezip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cindy

How do we get a starvation diet on a deficit?


20 posted on 02/09/2009 4:26:53 AM PST by jimfree (Freep and ye shall find!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cindy

It boggles the mind how out of touch with reality some people can be.


23 posted on 02/09/2009 5:00:47 AM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cindy

Now, thanks to the RATS, the taxpayers are on a starvation diet.


27 posted on 02/09/2009 5:21:32 AM PST by bgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson