Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: marktwain
The bulletproof case for concealed carry laws?

The word "bear" in the "keep and BEAR arms" part of the 2nd Amendment.

This, from Wikipedia...

In commentary written by Justice Cummings in United States v. Emerson, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit concluded in 2001 that:[48]

"there are numerous instances of the phrase 'bear arms' being used to describe a civilian's carrying of arms. Early constitutional provisions or declarations of rights in at least some ten different states speak of the right of the 'people' [or 'citizen' or 'citizens'] "to bear arms in defense of themselves [or 'himself'] and the state,' or equivalent words, thus indisputably reflecting that under common usage 'bear arms' was in no sense restricted to bearing arms in military service."[49]

Free citizens should not need ANY permission from the government to bear arms for defense.

4 posted on 02/08/2009 5:27:40 AM PST by DocH (Keep your powder dry and keep it in the black, fellow freedom-loving Patriots)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: DocH
Should have posted the above THIS way...

The bulletproof case for concealed carry laws?

The word "bear" in the "keep and BEAR arms" part of the 2nd Amendment.

This, from Wikipedia...

In commentary written by Justice Cummings in United States v. Emerson, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit concluded in 2001 that:[48]

"there are numerous instances of the phrase 'bear arms' being used to describe a civilian's carrying of arms. Early constitutional provisions or declarations of rights in at least some ten different states speak of the right of the 'people' [or 'citizen' or 'citizens'] "to bear arms in defense of themselves [or 'himself'] and the state,' or equivalent words, thus indisputably reflecting that under common usage 'bear arms' was in no sense restricted to bearing arms in military service."[49]

Free citizens should not need ANY permission from the government to bear arms for defense.

6 posted on 02/08/2009 5:30:02 AM PST by DocH (Keep your powder dry and keep it in the black, fellow freedom-loving Patriots)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: DocH
Free citizens should not need ANY permission from the government to bear arms for defense.

Absolutely! My permit was issued with the 2nd amendment. Period.

20 posted on 02/08/2009 6:04:45 AM PST by snippy_about_it (The FReeper Foxhole. America's history, America's soul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson