Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rendell notifies Pa. unions of intent to furlough
Times Leader (Wilkes-Barre PA) ^ | 1/29/09 | MARK SCOLFORO

Posted on 01/29/2009 7:04:16 PM PST by Born Conservative

HARRISBURG, Pa. (AP) - The Rendell administration told employee unions that state workers could be furloughed in a month and demanded they relinquish pay raises as the government scrambles to close a multibillion-dollar gap in state finances.

Negotiators for Gov. Ed Rendell also told representatives of the three major state workers' unions during a meeting Tuesday in Harrisburg that the administration wants to draw nearly $200 million from a reserve in their health insurance fund.

The governor's office also said it may institute "rolling furloughs" in which large parts of state government would be shuttered on certain days, while the workers would go without pay.

David Fillman, executive director of a union that represents 45,000 state workers, on Wednesday described the demands as unacceptable.

"I think it's premature for this threat of layoffs to shut everything down before they've fully exhausted other sources of revenue," said Fill man, head of Council 13 of the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees. "We should have been the discussion of last resort."

Rendell disclosed last week that he expected to order layoffs to take effect in the fiscal year that starts July 1. His annual budget address is next week.

The 30-day furlough notice was issued as a legal requirement but does not mean furloughs are more imminent or inevitable, Rendell spokesman Chuck Ardo said Wednesday. The administration said Tuesday that 1,000 to 2,000 jobs within the state's 78,000 full-time, salaried work force could be cut.

"The budget shortfall continues to grow exponentially and the situation changes on a daily basis," Ardo said.

He called the rolling furloughs one of the options under consideration.

"So long as the unions insist on maintaining their position, we are limited in our responses," he said.

The administration told the unions it wants them to agree to cancel a 2.25 percent raise that went into their paychecks this month, and to forgo a 3 percent pay increase scheduled for July 1. It also wants to reduce the Pennsylvania Employees Benefit Trust Fund's reserve from $244 million to $50 million.

Union officials said many of the demands required a vote by their members.

Wendell W. Young IV, president of Local 1776 of the United Food and Commercial Workers, said the trust fund's money provided a necessary cushion.

"If you cut it too close to the bone and there comes a day that the trust can't make its payments, you either have to cut benefits or increase the costs to employees," said Young, speaking for about 3,000 employees of state-owned liquor stores.

Kathy Jellison, president of the Pennsylvania Social Services Union, which represents about 10,000 state employees, said the unions gave Rendell's aides 23 pages of cost-savings suggestions.

Their analysis showed that the state's managerial ranks grew by 1, 200 during a recent period when the unions have lost 5,000 rank-and-file positions. They also argued that tax-code changes could be adopted.

"My members are scared," Jellison said. "They're afraid of layoffs, most certainly, and I certainly don't blame them."

The most recent estimate of the revenue shortfall for the end of the current fiscal year is $2.3 billion - or about 8 percent - and Rendell has to find about $3 billion more in increased revenues or spending cuts to balance the budget for the year that begins July 1.

Young said that he sympathized with Rendell's challenges but that he hopes the administration will look into the cost savings identified by the unions.

"It seems that the easy course is to go right to the workers who are raising families, supporting themselves and living paycheck to paycheck, and ask them to accept less," he said.

Rendell's aides and the unions plan to meet again on the subject after the Feb. 4 budget address.


TOPICS: Government; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: baboonbuttrendell; bc; fasteddie; layoffs; pondscum; rendell; slicklawyer; unions; unionthugs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: Tribune7
I know it sounds crazy.... click here
21 posted on 01/30/2009 7:44:16 AM PST by WhyisaTexasgirlinPA (Computer says No..... Carole Beer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: LeonardFMason

Rendell lucked out, in a way. Both his predecessor and his successor made him look much better than he really was.


22 posted on 01/30/2009 7:47:34 AM PST by Fresh Wind (Hey, Obama! Where's my check?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: WhyisaTexasgirlinPA
Well, the one thing we can be sure of is to stay out of N.J.

If it's any consolation my Delaware County (52) is higher than Fort Bend County.

Frankly, I'm kinda shocked that Delco would be higher than Bucks.

I'm surprised too that Philadelphia County is not on the list. I wonder if they are factoring in the Philly wage tax on workers who live in Delco? OTOH, I didn't even see Montco or Chesco on the list.

23 posted on 01/30/2009 8:01:10 AM PST by Tribune7 (Obama wants to put the same crowd that ran Fannie Mae in charge of health care)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Tribune7

I agree- maybe someone smarter than me will see the list and tell us if there is some hocus pocus formula going on here...


24 posted on 01/30/2009 8:19:18 AM PST by WhyisaTexasgirlinPA (Computer says No..... Carole Beer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: WhyisaTexasgirlinPA

You know, I didn’t see a sales tax category there. Does TX have one? If it’s less that 6 percent that would change things.


25 posted on 01/30/2009 12:05:42 PM PST by Tribune7 (Obama wants to put the same crowd that ran Fannie Mae in charge of health care)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Tribune7

8.25% sales tax- No state income tax but we pay more for things like car tags - I paid $36 a year in PA, $60 in Texas


26 posted on 01/30/2009 12:14:27 PM PST by WhyisaTexasgirlinPA (Computer says No..... Carole Beer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: WhyisaTexasgirlinPA
TX might have as high a tax burden as PA, although I still can't believe it.

Maybe the difference as to why Texans have jobs might be right to work & unions.

27 posted on 01/30/2009 3:55:07 PM PST by Tribune7 (Obama wants to put the same crowd that ran Fannie Mae in charge of health care)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson