Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bernard Madoff, the Mafia, and Naked Short Selling
Deep Capture ^ | January 19th, 2009 | Mark Mitchell

Posted on 01/20/2009 12:48:09 AM PST by rvoitier

Bernard L. Madoff was once the chairman of the NASDAQ stock exchange. He was one of the most important market makers on Wall Street. And he managed what was, by some estimates, the largest hedge fund on the planet.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Government
KEYWORDS: bernardmadoff; deepcapture; fraud; gasparino; madoff; mafia; ponzi; russianmafia; shortselling


DeepCapture.com named Best Business Blog of 2008, Web Blog Awards

Bernard Madoff, the Mafia, and Naked Short Selling

January 19th, 2009 by Mark Mitchell

Bernard L. Madoff was once the chairman of the NASDAQ stock exchange. He was one of the most important market makers on Wall Street. And he managed what was, by some estimates, the largest hedge fund on the planet.

Yes, Bernard Madoff was an impressive man. That much was clear even before we learned that his $50 billion Ponzi scheme may have been orchestrated in cahoots with the most powerful, sophisticated, and indiscriminately murderous organized crime syndicate the world has ever known.

Charles Gasparino (citing “speculation” from investigators) reported last week on CNBC that the Russian Mafia might have been partners in Madoff’s larcenous fund business. Or perhaps the Mob had an even greater interest in Madoff’s market making operation, as some of our sources have told us in recent weeks.

Either way, there is a certain cachet.

But it wasn’t just pierogies and pistol-packing wiseguys in purple suits. Mr. Madoff was also a dedicated public servant, volunteering countless hours at the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Indeed, Madoff seems to have written many of the SEC’s rules. For example, Madoff was the principal author of an SEC rule that exempted market makers (i.e. Madoff) from various regulations governing short sellers (i.e. Madoff’s friends).

Madoff’s rule ensured that market makers (Madoff) could, among other things, engage in so-called “naked short selling.” To sell “naked” is to sell stock that one does not actually possess. That is “phantom stock,” according to the SEC Chairman and many others.

Sometimes, short sellers (who profit when shares lose value) offload massive amounts of phantom stock to drive down prices, destroy pubic companies, or even crash the market. That is why there used to be restrictions.

At any rate, I don’t think Madoff had an office at the SEC. He certainly was not employed there. But the SEC was glad to have Madoff write a rule exempting Madoff from the rules. The formal name of the rule is, “the option market maker exception to Rule 203(b)1,” but the SEC was so thankful that it named the rule after the great man himself.

It was called, “The Madoff Exception.”

After Madoff wrote that rule, market makers (e.g., Madoff) proceeded to “rent” their exemption to hedge funds (i.e. friends-of-Madoff).

It remained against the law for hedge funds to sell phantom stock to manipulate the markets. It was also against the law for market makers to help hedge funds orchestrate such schemes. But under the Madoff regulatory regime, unscrupulous short sellers (i.e. friends-of-Madoff) could engage in this illegal activity so long as they did so with the illegal connivance of a law-breaking market maker (i.e. Madoff).

A few months ago, this naked short selling was implicated–by numerous academics, the U.S. Chamber of Chamber of Commerce, the Secretary of the Treasury, the CEOs of Wall Street’s biggest banks, respected law firms, John McCain, Hillary Clinton, and numerous congressmen – in the near total collapse of the American financial system.

The SEC has not prosecuted anybody for this. After all, there is an “exception.”

It is unclear whether the SEC will continue to name this “exception” after a man who might have absconded with 50 billion dollars (a sum that exceeds the gross domestic product of Pakistan) in league with the Russian Mob, an organization that is said to be in the market for a nuclear bomb – in addition to narcotics, sex slaves and, yes, phantom stock.

In any case, the major news organizations seem to have lost interest.

1 posted on 01/20/2009 12:48:09 AM PST by rvoitier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rvoitier

“A few months ago, this naked short selling was implicated–by numerous academics, the U.S. Chamber of Chamber of Commerce, the Secretary of the Treasury, the CEOs of Wall Street’s biggest banks, respected law firms, John McCain, Hillary Clinton, and numerous congressmen”

yes...these are exactly the people we can trust on economic issues. /sarc
People need to learn to rely on their own judgment and not expect some magical SEC to come and save them with their magical regulations. The SEC is a bureaucracy and a bureaucracy will always be incompetent and ineffective.


2 posted on 01/20/2009 12:59:13 AM PST by ari-freedom (Ignore Obama. He doesn't deserve any extra attention.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rvoitier
...destroy pubic companies, ...

Is this why Larry Flynt is looking for a bailout?

3 posted on 01/20/2009 1:24:35 AM PST by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom

later....


4 posted on 01/20/2009 2:11:56 AM PST by malia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rvoitier

"But it wasn’t just pierogies and pistol-packing wiseguys in purple suits."


5 posted on 01/20/2009 2:14:12 AM PST by Sir Francis Dashwood (Arjuna, why have you have dropped your bow???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rvoitier

It was called, “The Madoff Exception.”


6 posted on 01/20/2009 2:21:19 AM PST by Sir Francis Dashwood (Arjuna, why have you have dropped your bow???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom
yes...these are exactly the people we can trust on economic issues. /sarc


7 posted on 01/20/2009 2:27:12 AM PST by Sir Francis Dashwood (Arjuna, why have you have dropped your bow???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rvoitier
Madoff's Ponzi Scheme meltdown is nothing compared to the bigger one that's coming soon...

Social Security

The final folly of FDR has yet to come home to roost...

The biggest Ponzi Scheme of all time and the largest fraud perpetrated on the American people in history, by the worst failure of a President we have ever seen.

8 posted on 01/20/2009 2:58:33 AM PST by Bon mots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bon mots
I've never seen an evenhanded discussion of the effects of the New Deal on the depression etc. Democrats point to the New Deal as one of the greatest achievements of their party, and any attempt to legitimately examine its effects are met with ridicule.
9 posted on 01/20/2009 3:59:59 AM PST by pieceofthepuzzle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: pieceofthepuzzle
I've never seen an evenhanded discussion of the effects of the New Deal on the depression etc. Democrats point to the New Deal as one of the greatest achievements of their party, and any attempt to legitimately examine its effects are met with ridicule.

Read Rothbard's book:
America's Great Depression
Free download

10 posted on 01/20/2009 4:26:19 AM PST by Bon mots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: pieceofthepuzzle
I've never seen an evenhanded discussion of the effects of the New Deal on the depression etc. Democrats point to the New Deal as one of the greatest achievements of their party, and any attempt to legitimately examine its effects are met with ridicule.

FDR was the architect of the Great Depression.
It lasted for 12 years.

It was solved by Hitler and Hirohito.

11 posted on 01/20/2009 4:27:43 AM PST by Bon mots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: rvoitier

Madoff’s fund was never worth $50 Billion. He just SAID it was worth $50 Billion. It could never have been worth more than the sum total of what was ‘invested’ in it. And, it was always worth substantially less, since he spent the funds as soon as he got them. Just because he reported a growth to $50 Billion doesn’t make it that.


12 posted on 01/20/2009 6:53:10 AM PST by norwaypinesavage (Global Warming Theory is extremely robust with respect to data. All observations confirm it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rvoitier

bttt


13 posted on 01/20/2009 6:57:29 AM PST by The Californian (The door to the room of success swings on the hinges of opposition. Bob Jones, Sr.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson