She needs to be pushed out of the media spotlight. She's annoying, arrogant, and tyrannical. At this point, Obama is arrogant, heading towardst he tyrannical, but not annoying.
To: PrairieFireConservative
They pretty much deserve each other.
2 posted on
01/19/2009 3:22:31 PM PST by
bergmeid
(2012 - someone please fast forward.)
To: PrairieFireConservative
“She needs to be pushed out of the media spotlight. She’s annoying, arrogant, and tyrannical. At this point, Obama is arrogant, heading towardst he tyrannical, but not annoying.”
“She needs to be pushed out of the House..Period” There, Fixed it.
3 posted on
01/19/2009 3:25:29 PM PST by
blueyon
(Every one will have their 15 mins under the bus)
To: PrairieFireConservative
To: PrairieFireConservative
These actions by Pelosi is simply her way of ensuring re-election by the liberal whack job constituents that elect her.
5 posted on
01/19/2009 3:26:39 PM PST by
Fzob
(In matters of style, swim with the current; in matters of principle, stand like a rock. Jefferson)
To: PrairieFireConservative
You're right Madame Speaker. No one is above the law. Accordingly, I expect an investigation into your family's business dealings, in particular, the transactions involving land at the Presidio and ownership and financial transactions involving Star Kist (in light of the generous tax considerations which you rammed through on their behalf). That should be a good start.
6 posted on
01/19/2009 3:28:05 PM PST by
Corporate Law
(<>< - Xavier Basketball: Perennial Slayers of #1 Ranked Teams)
To: PrairieFireConservative
Ask her about Starkist Tuna, her hubby’s $14MM business interest where she fought minimum wage increases and gave a nice government economic development grant to American Samoa, where processing operations are housed.
Not really news for the MSM.
7 posted on
01/19/2009 3:31:28 PM PST by
wac3rd
(In the end, we all are Conservative, some just need their lives jolted to realize that fact.)
To: PrairieFireConservative
People like this creature have no judgement and lack any weight in public counsels. It is unfortunate that their degenerate electorate keep returning them to office. They are increasing the risk of Social War and hopefully they will be ignored.
8 posted on
01/19/2009 3:35:25 PM PST by
AEMILIUS PAULUS
(It is a shame that when these people give a riot)
To: PrairieFireConservative
If Pelosi really believed that "nobody is above the law" stuff she would have turned in her own father. "The Greatest Menace" by Lee Bernstein has this to say about him (page 56): "Baltimore mayor Thomas D'Alesandro Jr. became the "Siciliano protector" of "madames, gambling dens, and dope-peddlers"
9 posted on
01/19/2009 3:36:55 PM PST by
muawiyah
To: PrairieFireConservative
Oh Arthur, you silly boy...
Thee Democrat House and Senate leadership supported Obie over Hillary because they view him as easily manipulated.
Perhaps they know where literally the bodies are buried. I believe him to be compromised and easily blackmailed. Maybe they have a copy of the real birth certificate. Who knows? It doesn't matter. Bottom line is Nancy and Harry are effectively running things now. Obie is just window dressing.
10 posted on
01/19/2009 3:38:17 PM PST by
gov_bean_ counter
( Barak Obama: Pontificator in Chief and Poster Child for the Peter Principle)
To: PrairieFireConservative
There’s only room for one tyrant in DC, and Nine Percent Peloser isn’t it any more.
11 posted on
01/19/2009 3:39:54 PM PST by
Post Toasties
(It's not a smear if it's true.)
To: PrairieFireConservative
If President Bush broke the law, then so did Bill Clinton.
He fired every single U.S. Attorney we had from his first day and replaced them with his own cronies.
What does Nancy have to say to that? Democrat corruption doesn't count?
13 posted on
01/19/2009 3:51:15 PM PST by
pray4liberty
(Always vote for life!)
To: PrairieFireConservative
I have an idea, you can prosecute Bush If we can prosicute Dodd, Frank, Ried and you! hypocritical a##wipe
14 posted on
01/19/2009 3:53:48 PM PST by
ronnie raygun
(Is it time for my medication, reality is starting to set in.)
To: PrairieFireConservative
Her Republican opponent received up 10% of the vote, and Cindy Sheehan (you remember her) received 16% of the vote. I live in the Bay Area, but I didn't pay attention to her district's results. That says a lot about San Francisco, that Sheehan beat the Republican on the ballot.
-PJ
16 posted on
01/19/2009 4:03:37 PM PST by
Political Junkie Too
(You can never overestimate the Democrats' ability to overplay their hand.)
To: PrairieFireConservative
It will never happen. As someone pointed out earlier, The President knows ALL the dirty little secrets and it goes on both sides of the aisle. Remember how bad the Dems wanted Ashcroft and he threw down the gauntlet and started dropping memos. It seems like they started sniffing up another tree real quick when they realized he wasn’t going down quietly.
18 posted on
01/19/2009 4:18:46 PM PST by
lt.america
(Looking for a bailout)
To: PrairieFireConservative
“She needs to be pushed out of the media spotlight”
She needs to be pushed out a window.
I hope the Democrats do pursue war crimes. It will demonstrate that only W was fighting the war on terror.
It will be a PR nightmare for them. Not to mention, we’ll do it to them first chance we get.
19 posted on
01/19/2009 4:21:09 PM PST by
y6162
To: PrairieFireConservative
Nine percent Nancy needs to keep the BDS cargo cult going.
Why?
Nancy needs the shrieking from the BDS cargo cult to continue so she and the rest of the Corruptocrats can hide behind it.
22 posted on
01/19/2009 4:43:49 PM PST by
Nahanni
To: PrairieFireConservative
Why not encourage her to keep blabbering?
23 posted on
01/19/2009 4:49:18 PM PST by
listenhillary
(Socialists ~ Consuming the fruit of capitalists for more than 80 years!)
To: PrairieFireConservative
Pelosi going for war crimes would unite the conservatives which would not be good for Obama and he knows it. There will be no war crimes investigations.
24 posted on
01/19/2009 5:02:04 PM PST by
kempo
To: PrairieFireConservative
Obama is arrogant, heading towardst he tyrannical, but not annoying. Oh? And what is the color of the sky on the planet where you live?
Every time I see his "jug-handled" visage and hear is "um-un-ah" syncopated delivery, I'm ready to throw a shoe at my big screen! He da*n well is ANNOYING and has been since he started his two year run for the Presidency.
His carriage, his appearance, his manner of speech, his articulated beliefs, not to mention his choice of friends can be described as nothing except annoying. His disregard for the Constitution and 233 years of established precedent in governing this land is way up the list of things that wizz me off. I could go on but why bother...trust me on this, as time rolls along some three hundred million Americans will have plenty to be annoyed about.
Regards,
GtG
25 posted on
01/19/2009 5:02:09 PM PST by
Gandalf_The_Gray
(I live in my own little world, I like it 'cuz they know me here.)
To: PrairieFireConservative
Barack Obama isn't just another new president.He brings a multi-million person grassroots force with him into the office.
That's a scary sentence:
Adolf Hitler isn't just another new president.
He brings a multi-million person grassroots force with him into the office.
26 posted on
01/19/2009 9:51:05 PM PST by
an amused spectator
(Citizen Kenyan: The man who created The Sock-Puppet Constitution.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson