Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ambushed on the Potomac
National Interest ^ | January 6, 2009 | Richard Perle

Posted on 01/18/2009 3:32:17 AM PST by billorites

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: billorites

One of the most interesting things I’ve read for some time. Thanks.


21 posted on 01/18/2009 5:37:01 AM PST by MadJack ("Patience is bitter, but its fruit is sweet." (Afghan proverb))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Andrewksu

ping


22 posted on 01/18/2009 6:45:13 AM PST by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billorites

Those who expect an Obama foreign policy to differ significantly from the most recent policy of the outgoing administration will be surprised by what is likely to be a seamless transition: not from White House to White House, but from State Department to State Department. On all the main issues—Iraq, Iran, Russia, China, Islamist terrorism, Syria, the Israeli-Palestinian dispute, relations with allies—Obama’s first term is likely to look like Bush’s second.
***Another interesting article you posted. Thanks. Again, due to long-windedness of the authors I’ll need to finish it later. But this is an interesting point worth considering.


23 posted on 01/18/2009 9:04:29 AM PST by Kevmo ( It's all over for this Country as a Constitutional Republic. ~Leo Donofrio, 12/14/08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo
I think this Perle article is one of the more thoughtful reviews of Bush's accomplishments and failures in the foreign policy arena.

The Bush administration vividly demonstrates how events drive and shape a President. I don't expect the incoming administration will encounter anything different.

24 posted on 01/18/2009 9:12:39 AM PST by billorites
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford
"I have always been fascinated by this undeniable reluctance on the part of George Bush to fight his corner. I have never thought that he was motivated by mean considerations. Rather, I believe that it comes from his upbringing and his Christian character which finds politicking and self congratulation, or even exculpatory explanation, to be somehow unseemly or ungentlemanly. He regards himself as a statesman not as a politician as a Christian and not a party man."

It is common that what we at first admire in a leader we later come to despise.

In management the very qualities that lead a board of directors to choose Candidate A for the CEO position later become his or her undoing as those very traits become sources of irritation, fail to adapt appropriately to changes in environment, or otherwise come to be disdained.

There was a time when Bush's particular character traits of stubbornness, loyalty, plain-speaking, etc. were viewed as assets and admired.

There's something Shakespearean about almost every Presidency these days. Familiarity indeed breeds contempt.

25 posted on 01/18/2009 9:28:00 AM PST by billorites
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: billorites

bookmark


26 posted on 01/18/2009 5:20:12 PM PST by musicman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson