Every Jew, everywhere, should lawfully purchase a firearm, obtain a concealed-carry license, and learn how to use it, and where it's not legal, they should stop opposing decriminalization of armed self-defense.
Posted on 01/11/2009 2:15:48 PM PST by SJackson
Whole lot os stupids out there.
While I'd agree with you about gun rights, I don't think it's an issue here. Middle of the night vandalism would be deterred by the simple presence of a watchman. And these attacks happen in Florida, a long time concealed carry state. And I've no doubt vandalism occurs in Texas. A better deterrent would be serious criminal charges, which won't happen in Chicago. If you recall our Pres to be opposed felony charges for a youth committing his SECOND violent felony, having gotten a pass on the first youthful indescretion.
Relative to arms, a better example would be the violent attacks, which I fear will escalate. Compare the attack on the community center in Seattle, 1 dead Jew, four wounded, a sane Muslim perp who admits it was a crime directed at Jews, and a jury that refused to convict. On anything. To the LA El Al attack. 1 (2?-I think 2nd survived) dead passenger, 1 dead perp. A much better outcome, because armed security was on the scene. And a competent, armed civilian would have sufficed.
You don't have to, and you're not alone, you and others who share your fascist mindset earn my utter contempt.
Why assume that muslims did this? Vandalizing synagogues has been a favorite passtime for some Americans for decades, long before there were any muslims here.
While he would no doubt be in favor of felony charges for an ordinary law-abiding citizen who shot one of these feral youths in self defense. Agree?
Every Jew, everywhere, should lawfully purchase a firearm, obtain a concealed-carry license, and learn how to use it, and where it's not legal, they should stop opposing decriminalization of armed self-defense.
I think that's irrelevant.
Well I think it's spot-on. This is just the beginning.
Bogus Doctor, 25, Sexually Assaulted Pensioner In Home
(Muslim Predator Violates 82 Year-Old Widow)
The Sentinel (U.K.) | Saturday, January 10, 2009 | The Sentinel (U.K.)
Posted on 01/11/2009 3:45:44 PM PST by DogByte6RER
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2162853/posts
Where is all the anti-Muslim vandalism? What, no bricks thrown through the local Islamic Center saying “Death to Palestine, Free Israel”?
Not that I advocate violence, I just keep hearing that the Jews and Americans are no better than the terrorists.
The Obama Legacy Part One..
How many Palestinians does it take to change a lightbulb? None! They will sit in the darkness and blame it on the Jews..
Thank you. I will gladly accept the label from someone who obviously rejects what Israel stands for. I only hope Likud, and Bibi Netanyaho wins the upcoming election and will protect Israel instead of giving away land. Land for peace has not worked but I presume you believe it still might.
It's ironic, American Christians stand with Israel all she stands for, while American Jews do not.
Again, I'll acknowledge your pleasure at the vandalism and firebombing of Synagogues here in Chicago.
As to your characterization of me as just another Jew who rejects Israel, you're not the first idiot I've conversed with on FR. If you're going to make charges like that you have to grow a set and back them up. Factually, not with some one liner like a vandal streaking by in the night.
This isn't about Obama, it's about the acceptance of anti-religious violence as an advocacy device, no different than the gay attacks on Catholics and Mormons. While I perceive it to be more acceptable on the left, it's not a political issue and should be opposed across the board.
Yes, it is all part of the Obamanite attack on non TROP religions. For a few decades, the popular culture has insideously created this situation.
He certainly come from this enviornment, he attended a racist Church for years, and is comfortable associating with racists, Jewhaters and terrorists, it's reasonable to assume he'd oppose, however these Synagogue attacks aren't attributable to Obama, and would have happened had McCain won, or had Obama still been a nondescript State Senator. At this point he's irrelevant to what are criminal, possibly terrorist related, crimes. If he calls the investigation off next week, the Feds are involved, then there's a basis for criticism, but I doubt that will happen. And I know you wouldn't do it, but ignoring or condoning incidents like this as has been done on several threads because Jews voted for Obama doesn't make any friends for the GOP.
Most of the Jews voting for Obama have a type of Stockholm Syndrome, particularly in large urban centers..
Which is completely irrelevant relative to criminal activity and law enforcement. The attempted fire bombing of a Reform Synagogue, probably majority Obama voters, in Chicago New Years weekend is a crime, as are the attacks on the four Orthodox Synagogues/Schools, probably McCain voters, the article is discussing. Same with the disruption of the New York wedding, I haven't a clue if the family and guests were Orthodox, probably McCain, or Reform, probably Obama voters, nor does it matter.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.