Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Assisted Suicide Now Officially Legal in Montana as Judge Rules Again
Life News ^ | 1/9/09 | Steven Ertelt

Posted on 01/09/2009 11:51:48 AM PST by wagglebee

Helena, MT (LifeNews.com) -- Montana officially became the third state to allow assisted suicide as a state judge ruled again on the issue. Helena District Judge Dorothy McCarter handed down her ruling allowing the practice in December and, this week, ruled again by dismissing a request for an injunction during the appeal.

McCarter decided in December that a terminally ill patient Robert Baxter and mentally competent, terminally ill Montana residents like him can self-administer lethal drugs given to them in prescriptions from willing doctors.

Montana Attorney General Mike McGrath has filed an appeal of the decision and asked Judge McCarter for a temporary injunction preventing assisted suicides from occurring while the appeal proceeds.

McCarter declined and her ruling means assisted suicides can move ahead as of Wednesday without patients or doctors fearing prosecution.

Wesley J. Smith, an attorney who is a leading bioethics watchdog, condemned McCarter's refusal to stop assisted suicides while the case moves along.

"When a very controversial ruling comes down from our rulers in black robes, it is customary that pending an appeal to the highest court, the decision be stayed--that is suspended--until the final decision from a higher court is in," he said.

"Judges are becoming too arrogant for our good as a nation," Smith lamented. "Culture-rending changes in law and morality should not be decided undemocratically by promoting a judge's own ideology through wrenching and twisting constitutional terms to mean things that were not intended when they were enacted."

The case has also taken an odd twist as McGrath has since been sworn in as the chief justice of the Montana Supreme Court, but has said he will recuse himself once the high court takes the appeal.

Another battle could also come into play in the state legislature as Rep. Dick Barrett, a Missoula Democrat, has filed legislation that put McCarter's ruling into law with a bill to officially legally assisted suicide.

McCarter had initially misused the privacy provision in the state Constitution, intended to oppose wiretapping and other surveillance, to say that patients have a right to an assisted suicide without legal consequences.

Following the decision, the Montana Medical Association indicated it refused to get involved and came under fire for not submitting an amicus brief supporting McCarter's attempt to overturn the ruling.

Montana joins Oregon and Washington as the only three states in the nation to allow assisted suicides.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Montana
KEYWORDS: euthanasia; moralabsolutes; prolife
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
"Judges are becoming too arrogant for our good as a nation," Smith lamented. "Culture-rending changes in law and morality should not be decided undemocratically by promoting a judge's own ideology through wrenching and twisting constitutional terms to mean things that were not intended when they were enacted."

And it should come as no surprise that this is the left's preferred method for advancing their evil agenda.

1 posted on 01/09/2009 11:51:48 AM PST by wagglebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 185JHP; 230FMJ; 50mm; 69ConvertibleFirebird; Aleighanne; Alexander Rubin; ...
Moral Absolutes Ping!

Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.

FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]


2 posted on 01/09/2009 11:52:16 AM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

They just sanctioned a law that says government can murder at will. Good going Montana. Not


3 posted on 01/09/2009 11:55:02 AM PST by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cgk; Coleus; cpforlife.org; narses; Salvation; 8mmMauser

Pro-Life Ping


4 posted on 01/09/2009 12:01:00 PM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freekitty
You convince a few of those judges up there to commit suicide and they might change their minds about it being such a good idea.

Seems to me this law allows someone claiming to be little more than a witchdoctor to kill someone without consequences.

5 posted on 01/09/2009 12:04:04 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

There is a vast difference between a group of greedy heirs who want to disconnect gramps from the old ventilator to get their hands on the family fortune and some individual who wants to play the ultimate martyr role and pull the curtain on a personal drama. I say good riddance and stop the whining once and for all.
And no, I have no pity for those who pity themselves.


6 posted on 01/09/2009 12:10:05 PM PST by fortunate sun (Tagline written in lemon juice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

personally I don’t have a problem with this. If I were to come down with a horible condition that odds of survival were nill, I would want to bow out as I see fit. However, I can see the catch 22 that this puts doctors into.


7 posted on 01/09/2009 12:14:56 PM PST by Cyclone59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

Yep


8 posted on 01/09/2009 12:32:36 PM PST by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

ha ha ha,

What are people talking about when they say that there is a slippery slope?


9 posted on 01/09/2009 12:40:29 PM PST by Red6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freekitty
They just sanctioned a law that says government can murder at will.

This argument is just a smoke screen from people who need to interfere with man's God given right of self determination. There is no moral difference between people using this argument and those who want to take guns away from us all because guns can kill.

10 posted on 01/09/2009 12:41:28 PM PST by Jeff Gordon ("An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile hoping it will eat him last." Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Big Die Country


11 posted on 01/09/2009 12:46:18 PM PST by UncleDick (Sola fide)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red6

In the legal landscape, there will be found a lake where people go on a fishing expedition, the lake is at the bottom of a slippery slope where all who fall behind on their hard row to hoe experience a chilling effect; this land is known as the lawn of good intentions...


12 posted on 01/09/2009 12:51:45 PM PST by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, then writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: fortunate sun

I tend to agree.

I am strongly opposed to suicide on moral and theological grounds.

The horror -— murder, really -— that ocurred in Florida with the dehydration of Terri Schiavo sickens me -— because it was not, at all clear that such was her choice. (I think her husband set it up to kill her, in fact.)

But if a rational adult choses to do this, that’s between them and G-d.


13 posted on 01/09/2009 12:55:19 PM PST by MeanWestTexan (Beware Obama's Reichstag fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Physician assisted suicide is part of the RATs “universal health care” plan as a way to ration expensive medical treatments for the elderly and disabled.


14 posted on 01/09/2009 2:11:11 PM PST by DFG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cyclone59
Why don't we discuss this in Montana while it's still legal for a noide such as myself to, you know, reference your request for release.

Now do you see the problem with what's going on there ~ it's just a step beyond Oregon's strange law, but only just.....

I think the slippery slope has arrived.

15 posted on 01/09/2009 2:22:40 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Cyclone59
Why don't we discuss this in Montana while it's still legal for a noide such as myself to, you know, reference your request for release.

Now do you see the problem with what's going on there ~ it's just a step beyond Oregon's strange law, but only just.....

I think the slippery slope has arrived.

16 posted on 01/09/2009 2:25:14 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Gordon

They have dumbed down America enough to accept non thinking.


17 posted on 01/09/2009 3:05:51 PM PST by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MeanWestTexan

Yup, you, me and Dr. Gregory House are in agreement.


18 posted on 01/09/2009 3:14:50 PM PST by eastforker (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: All
Pinged from Terri Dailies


19 posted on 01/09/2009 4:56:33 PM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red6

there is indeed a slippery slope.

Once the idea that suicide is an honorable choice for anyone whose life is miserable, you see an increase in suicides in all ages.

You then get pressure on those who see they are burdening their caretakers.

Often people say in despair: I wish I could die. Usually others say no, you are loved, we can stop the pain/illness or we want to care for you.

Now you see” You want to die? I’ll help you” which to a person in depression says: Yes, you are useless. Die for my sake.

Then the idea spreads that if you are sick/handicapped you ought to die. There is a Dame in the UK who essentially says if you have Alzheimers, you owe it to the country to die, because you are wasting the time and effort of your caretakers, and cost the state money.

Then you have people like ambulance drivers in a case in the UK where they didn’t help a dying man becausea he was handicapped......

Indeed, the handicapped are the main ones who are against these laws: Because they know a lot of perfect people, including doctors and nurses, would be glad to “help them die” if they thought they could get away with it, because they project their own feelings on the handicapped.


20 posted on 01/09/2009 5:12:47 PM PST by LadyDoc (liberals only love politically correct poor people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson