Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What will Obama do about the F-22?
star-telegram ^ | Dec. 29, 2008 | BOB COX

Posted on 01/01/2009 4:14:24 AM PST by pobeda1945

Sometime during his first couple of months in office, President-elect Barack Obama will have to confront one of his first big decisions about U.S. defense policy and budgets.

And it’s a thorny one.

Specifically, Obama and his as-yet-unnamed circle of top defense advisers will have to determine whether to continue spending roughly $4 billion a year to buy F-22 Raptor fighter jets built by Lockheed Martin.

They might decide, as the Bush administration has, that the F-22 is superfluous and that the money is needed for other priorities. On the other hand, the Air Force, according to defense analysts and consultants, wants to buy at least 60 more of the $180 million jets.

Jim McAleese, a consultant with close ties to the Air Force, told a Reuters conference in Washington last week that the service was putting "all its political capital" into buying more F-22s beyond the 183 on order.

(Excerpt) Read more at star-telegram.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bhodod; cicobama; f22; obama; obamatransitionfile; usaf; weapons; wuss
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-111 next last

1 posted on 01/01/2009 4:14:25 AM PST by pobeda1945
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: pobeda1945

Comrade 0bama will cancel the F-22. It is the inherent nature of Marxists to weaken America to the advantage of our enemies, while pouring money into their Communistic agenda and of course, into their corrupt pockets.

Goodbye Raptor, it was nice while it lasted, which wasn’t long.


2 posted on 01/01/2009 4:18:39 AM PST by mkjessup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pobeda1945
Photobucket
3 posted on 01/01/2009 4:24:48 AM PST by TommyDale (I) (Never forget the Republicans who voted for illegal immigrant amnesty in 2007!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pobeda1945
I know my AF buddies think there is no such thing as a “too expensive” fighter plane, but if there ever was one, the F-22 might be it. Up graded F-16’s and F-18’s can answer the mail for at least another decade.
4 posted on 01/01/2009 4:24:58 AM PST by NavVet ( If you don't defend Conservatism in the Primaries, you won't have it to defend in November)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pobeda1945

Obama needs the money to create the “domestic army” he wants to use against Americans.


5 posted on 01/01/2009 4:28:01 AM PST by Wilhelm Tell (True or False? This is not a tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup
Comrade 0bama will cancel the F-22.

Comrade Bush wants to cancel it, too.

Unlike Bush I think that Obama will agree to the additional buy. To cancel it now puts all those jobs - union jobs - at risk of being lost. Obama will play to his base.

6 posted on 01/01/2009 4:28:36 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: pobeda1945

I am betting on “plausible deniability” will keep Obama in the dark about our most secretive and technically advanced projects.Just like the episode in Independance Day the movie and the aliens hidden away from the Presidents.

No sense in giving a monkey a loaded gun.


7 posted on 01/01/2009 4:29:47 AM PST by Eye of Unk (How strangely will the Tools of a Tyrant pervert the plain Meaning of Words! SA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup

I don’t understand why the Air Force uses high tech aircraft to drop bombs in environments that are free of air defense and enemy air craft. It would be like the Navy delivering cargo with destroyers, or the Army using Abrams tanks instead of commercial trucks.


8 posted on 01/01/2009 4:29:53 AM PST by Leisler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: pobeda1945
What will Obama do about the F-22?

Sell the plans to the Chinese in exchange for campaign contributions?
9 posted on 01/01/2009 4:32:35 AM PST by Boris99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NavVet
I know my AF buddies think there is no such thing as a “too expensive” fighter plane, but if there ever was one, the F-22 might be it.

Is one ex-Air Force pilot, aeronautical engineer, and acquisition officer who completely agrees with you.

The simple truth is the F-22 was, and is, killing the Air Force budget.

One of the reasons Gates sacked the Air Force Chief of Staff and Secretary is because of the terrible myopic tunnel vision they had regarding the F-22.

The nuke handling problems were "boob bait for the bubbas" and a good public excuse.

The F-22 is the most expensive fighter in history. Only the B-2 can be calculated to be more expensive, and that only comes about when you add in decades of US stealth research to the per unit cost.

Because of Air Force leadership "Gotta-Have-It-itis", they decided (during a time of war on two fronts), to sack 40,000 people.

Then, they backtracked when it backfired - and tried other budget shenanigans.

10 posted on 01/01/2009 4:33:08 AM PST by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: pobeda1945

What will Obama do about the F-22?

The same thing he will do about everything else - what he is told to do. Obama would not know an F-22 from a Formula-1 car.
The man has no experience that qualified him for this position.


11 posted on 01/01/2009 4:34:28 AM PST by SECURE AMERICA (Coming to You From the Front Lines of Occupied America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leisler
I don’t understand why the Air Force uses high tech aircraft to drop bombs in environments that are free of air defense and enemy air craft. It would be like the Navy delivering cargo with destroyers, or the Army using Abrams tanks instead of commercial trucks.

It's called developing weapon systems with capabilities to meet FUTURE threats, because as those future threats develop and emerge, it is far more costly (and in most cases impossible) to go back to the production line and modify our weapons to meet the challenge of the newest emerging threat.

Former Senator and presidential wannabe Gary Hart made that argument, and it was rejected wholeheartedly by the defense establishment too.
12 posted on 01/01/2009 4:40:02 AM PST by mkjessup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
Comrade 0bama will cancel the F-22.
Comrade Bush wants to cancel it, too.


Birds of a feather. Proves the difference between a Marxist and a RINO, i.e., on that basis, even Bush has admitted that he sacrificed 'free market principles' to 'save' (as he saw it) the economy with that socialist multi-billion-dollar bailout. He's as big a free-spending loser as that other Texas phuckwit, LBJ. You get no arguments from me on 'Comrade Bush'.

Unlike Bush I think that Obama will agree to the additional buy. To cancel it now puts all those jobs - union jobs - at risk of being lost. Obama will play to his base.

0bama's Communist politburo will override any union considerations, IMHO.
13 posted on 01/01/2009 4:44:24 AM PST by mkjessup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup

I think that it might be better to consider the F/A-22 to be an interim type. We’ve got two problems. First off they’re expensive. A hundred eighty million is what a destroyer or a frigate costs, and paying that much for what by the nature of it’s employment is a fungible asset is insane.

Secondly, they’re so expensive that we dare not hazard them in combat because soon they’ll be out of production and we can’t replace them. That’s about the same as not having airplanes in the first place. Losing any, will be a net loss to us no matter how many enemy aircraft they destroy.

So, I think that what we need to do is to keep the F-22 line open, but at the same time, we need to come up with what I guess we could call and Advanced Austere Air Superiority Fighter. Figure, a flyaway cost of fifty million or less.

Think about it. When I was a kid, McDonnell-Douglas produced around 2700 F-4 Phantom II variants at around four and a half million per copy, and Congress was threatening to close the F-14A production line because they cost thirteen point two million each, and it took a direct threat by Grumman to shut the line down themselves if Congress wasn’t willing to purchase Lot 13, which was the first production lot that they were going to make any money on. Idiots like Proxmire were outvoted and the Tomcat was the top line Navy fighter until it was withdrawn, prematurely IMHO, from service.

And even with inflation, we’re looking at the fifty to sixty million range as a comparative flyaway cost with the old Tomcat. We should be able to build an acceptable fighter that we can acquire in quantity for a like sum, when you adjust for inflation.

More importantly, we could have a plane that could deal with Neo-Soviet and Chinese Fifth Generation Fighter programs that has some small chance of being acquired in quantity— something that flat won’t happen with the F/A-22 Raptor.

And we can’t rely on the F-34 and it’s various variants because it’s really more of a modern equivalent of an A-4 Skyhawk, (although I do think that Ed Heineman could still have done it better— we really need a new “Scooter”) and it doesn’t change the fact that we need an air superiority fighter and we need one that we can acquire in quantity, risk in combat and tolerate losses which is inevitable in any form of air war.

Bottom line here is that the Air Force needs to start thinking like guys who are going to fight a real war, rather than guys who play for bragging rights.


14 posted on 01/01/2009 4:44:32 AM PST by Mi5ke561 (Show me a junkyard and I'll show you an arsenal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: pobeda1945

I figger it will take His O-ness about 6 months to decide just exactly what an F-22 is....


15 posted on 01/01/2009 4:48:06 AM PST by mo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pobeda1945

The F-22 is so much superior to enemy aircraft that the Russians and Chinese are screaming “Unfair!” That should tell us all something.


16 posted on 01/01/2009 4:51:25 AM PST by TommyDale (I) (Never forget the Republicans who voted for illegal immigrant amnesty in 2007!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TommyDale
I've seen the F-22 in action. A helluva an aircraft.

If Russia and China are screaming unfair, then you're right, time to build that sucker.

17 posted on 01/01/2009 4:57:09 AM PST by Northern Yankee (Freedom Needs A Soldier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Very impressive F22 video here:

Link

18 posted on 01/01/2009 4:57:14 AM PST by labette ( Humble student of Thinkology)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pobeda1945
They might decide, as the Bush administration has, that the F-22 is superfluous and that the money is needed for other priorities.

Even a stopped clock is correct twice a day, here the jorge administration is correct.

19 posted on 01/01/2009 4:59:11 AM PST by org.whodat (Conservatives don't vote for Bailouts for Super-Rich Bankers! Republicans do!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pobeda1945

If only oumoney could buy politicians of the exceptional quality of the F-22 Raptor!


20 posted on 01/01/2009 4:59:24 AM PST by RoadTest (The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it? - Jer.17:9)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-111 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson