If there were real proof The Enquirer would be all over it. Their distant past earned them a reputation they have long since outgrown. They practice methods the mainstream media considers unethical, but those methods do tend to get results.
I am not saying it’s not true, but if it is the evidence and reliable witnesses have been well hidden.
No, the Enquirer has an agenda and it has been to protect Obama.
There is some sort of connection there because the Enquirer has been uncharacteristically absent on ANY Obama scandal, including Wright, Rezco, Sinclair, Ayers, the LA Times tape, and all the legion of others.
They would nailed anyone else.
It is strange.
Years ago I sold a couple articles to the Enquirer, and they demanded proof of every word, and far more documentation than any other paper ever did.
Everything Barry’s handlers could scrub has been scrubbed...they’ve missed some of it...however...and it is being brought out...