Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is Israel Using ‘Disproportionate Force’
http://www.jewishworldreview.com/1208/disproportionate_dore.php3 ^ | Dore Gold

Posted on 12/31/2008 8:24:58 AM PST by ventanax5

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last
To: ventanax5

Rules in war?

That’s how you lose wars.

There’s that pesky Geneva convention to worry about, however.


21 posted on 12/31/2008 8:48:05 AM PST by Glenn (Free Venezuela!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: csmusaret

What’s the old saying? “The only ‘fair-fight’ is the one you lose”?

What the Media is hinting at is that the Israelis should cooperate in tit-for-tat small-scale violence. ‘Course even then the Israelis will be criticized anytime a civilian gets scratched by shrapnel, whereas the other side can actually target civilians with impunity.


22 posted on 12/31/2008 8:48:17 AM PST by Tallguy ("The sh- t's chess, it ain't checkers!" -- Alonzo (Denzel Washington) in "Training Day")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy

It is time we had a President who says exactly that. He should also tell the little Prince to let his fellow Jordanians resettle anywhere they want in their native country of Jordan.


23 posted on 12/31/2008 8:55:20 AM PST by csmusaret (Congress hasn't got anything right since they declared war on Japan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: csmusaret

Disproportionate? You’re kidding right?

When I go to war, I want the biggest advantage I can get. Generally speaking, that insures victory for my side and the least amount of casualties in the long run for the other side.

Most recently, check out the Iran/Iraq war of the eighties. Two sides, niether with a disproportionate advantage fought a stalemate for years. Millions died.

Which war would you rather be in?


24 posted on 12/31/2008 8:58:34 AM PST by Vermont Lt (I am not from Vermont. I lived there for four years and that was enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: ventanax5
Is Israel using "Disproportionate Force"

"Disproportionate Force" is code for surrender monkeys.

Israel's job is to make the their country safe from attack as quickly and efficiently as possible. Tit for tat is not and has not ever worked.

25 posted on 12/31/2008 8:59:21 AM PST by BillT (Socialism = Equal Poverty for ALL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ventanax5

Let’s see, Israel is hitting rockets with rockets. Doesn’t seem to be unfair at all.


26 posted on 12/31/2008 9:01:09 AM PST by CodeToad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ventanax5
'Disproportionate Force’

Liberal Speak for killing too many enemies, not fighting fair.

27 posted on 12/31/2008 9:02:32 AM PST by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ventanax5

Disproportion is what wins wars. “All is fair is love and war.” The kill ratio ought to be 10,000 to 1, not 100 to 1 as it is now.


28 posted on 12/31/2008 9:03:17 AM PST by TexasRepublic (Comrade, can you spare a crust of bread?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CodeMasterPhilzar

“If that means it isn’t a fair fight, then they shouldn’t have engaged you in the first place, they were stupid.”

Precisely. And we all know that stupidity is a capital offense.


29 posted on 12/31/2008 9:03:17 AM PST by roaddog727 (BS does not get bridges built - the funk you see is the funk you do)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ventanax5

“Doctrine of proportionality?” So I guess if a burglar breaks in, fires at you and misses, you should give him another shot before shooting back??!! Only the whacked out left could invent the doctrine of proportionality. On the other hand, I am definitely PRO turning Hamas members into small, separate PORTIONS.


30 posted on 12/31/2008 9:04:59 AM PST by Oldpuppymax (AGENDA OF THE LEFT EXPOSED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ventanax5

Only idiots would ask that question.


31 posted on 12/31/2008 9:05:46 AM PST by mulligan (A)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ventanax5
The very idea of supposed "rules of war" is absurd on its face. What enemy evil enough that the US would go to war with it is going to abide by "the rules" anyway?

The facts of history show that one side will do whatever the heck it wants anyway. As with gun control, rules/laws of war only serve to restrain one side.

32 posted on 12/31/2008 9:10:18 AM PST by TChris (So many useful idiots...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Win or Die, not this PC crap. When will we ever learn, fight to win, smash your enemy. Poof


33 posted on 12/31/2008 9:11:54 AM PST by Rj Snows
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ventanax5

Have the rocket attacks stopped? If not, they haven’t used enough force.


34 posted on 12/31/2008 9:14:50 AM PST by SmithL (The Golden State demands all of your gold)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ventanax5
I'd call it disproportionate:

A rocket apparently fired by Palestinians on Friday killed the two Palestinians aged five and 13, Palestinian medics said. None of Gaza's militant factions claimed responsibility for the deadly attack on the house in Beit Lahiya. Gaza Health Ministry official Dr. Moiaya Hassanain identified the two victims as 5-year-old Hanin Abu Khoussa and her 12-year-old cousin, Sabah Abu Khoussa. Three other young people were wounded, Hassanain said.


Israeli construction worker injured by random rocket attack

TEL AVIV, December 27 (RIA Novosti) - Rocket fire from Palestinian militants on Saturday killed one person and injured five in southern Israel, Israeli emergency services said.

"In the town of Netivot, a rocket hit a residential building. We have one dead, one critically wounded and another four or five people slightly injured," an emergency service spokesman said.

Prior to 2006, the number of Palestinian rocket attacks rarely reached 50 per month. By early 2008, Hamas displayed a capability of launching nearly 50 per day.

I'd say that Israel's response is disproportionately mild. I'm hoping they'll respond proportionately ... in the manner and to the degree that any responsible government other than Israel would be expected to respond to several years of random attacks against civilians ... before this is over.

35 posted on 12/31/2008 9:23:46 AM PST by MathDoc (Don't blame me, I voted for Governor Palin and the wrinkly white-haired guy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ventanax5
When dealing with terrorists, radical islamos, and those who would do anything to kill you, your family, and your nation, there is no such thing as "disproportionate force".

It is too bad American hasn't learned that important fact. Leave it up to our politicians to fail again and again to learn this??

36 posted on 12/31/2008 9:28:58 AM PST by Logic n' Reason ("Never allow someone to be your priority while allowing yourself to be their option.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ventanax5

War is NOT a matter of, “If you kill one of mine, I can kill one of yours.”

War is, “If you kill one of mine, I will kill ALL of yours!”


37 posted on 12/31/2008 9:30:00 AM PST by dbacks (God help the USA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ventanax5

If a bank is being robbed by one gunman, you don’t sent in one cop to deal with the situation!


38 posted on 12/31/2008 9:33:57 AM PST by poindexter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ventanax5
"They pull a knife, you pull a gun. He sends one of yours to the hospital, you send one of his to the morgue. *That's* the "Chicago" way!"


39 posted on 12/31/2008 9:36:03 AM PST by Bloody Sam Roberts (Ronald Reagan had a vision of America. Barack Obama has a vision of Barack Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ventanax5
Irrelevant question. Once force is justified, there is no such thing as "disproportionate" The correct question might be whether force was (or is) justified. Once you answer that, the only thing that remains is "...to crush your enemy, to drive him before you and to hear the lamentation of his women"

Talk of such things as "disproportionate" is self defeating. Save that for the hippies

40 posted on 12/31/2008 9:42:00 AM PST by Lloyd227 (Class of 1998 (let's all help the Team McCain spider monkeys decide how to moderate))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson