Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senate's authority to reject potential Blagojevich appointee unclear
latimes.com ^ | December 30, 2008 | David G. Savage

Posted on 12/30/2008 12:02:33 PM PST by Free ThinkerNY

Reporting from Washington -- Senate Democrats threatened this week to refuse to seat any new Illinois senator chosen by embattled Gov. Rod R. Blagojevich, but it is not clear the senators have the legal authority to reject a fully qualified appointee.

In 1969, the Supreme Court ruled that the House of Representatives could not refuse to seat Rep. Adam Clayton Powell Jr., a New York Democrat who was accused of putting his wife on the payroll and misusing travel funds to vacation in the Caribbean. Despite those charges, he had been reelected by his constituents in Harlem.

"The Constitution does not vest in the Congress a discretionary power to deny membership by majority vote," wrote Chief Justice Earl Warren. Congress may "judge only the qualifications set forth in the Constitution," he said.

The qualifications are minimal. A senator must be at least 30 years old, a U.S. citizen and "an inhabitant" of the state.

The ruling in the Powell case served as a precedent in 1995 when the Supreme Court struck down term limits for members of Congress. The justices said that states may not add extra qualifications for serving in Congress, including restricting the years of service.

Warren said in his opinion that the Senate's power over its members "is identical" to that of the House.

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: blago; blagojevich; bleepgate; obama; obamatransitionfile
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

1 posted on 12/30/2008 12:02:34 PM PST by Free ThinkerNY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Blago is speaking right now, I don’t know but I just like this guy, knowing he has the goods on Obama, he can bring Obama down with a blink of an eye, GO BLAGO GO


2 posted on 12/30/2008 12:03:37 PM PST by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Well, that will be interesting..., Democrats fighting Democrats...


3 posted on 12/30/2008 12:06:12 PM PST by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sarah Barracuda
but I just like this guy,

You can be happy he's throwing some sand in the Dem Vaseline, but for the love of Mike please don't 'like' him. He's a Chicago Machine scum bucket who tried to shake down Childrens Memorial Hospital for campaign contributions.

We have a long tradition of having dirtball Politicos here in IL, but this guy is one of the absolute worst.

L

4 posted on 12/30/2008 12:06:20 PM PST by Lurker ("America is at that awkward stage. " Claire Wolfe, call your office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

I know I know but he has the goods on Obama, just that alone makes me sorta like him. All the politicians in Chicago are scumbags, but at least this scumbag has the goods on the scumbag that was elected President


5 posted on 12/30/2008 12:11:05 PM PST by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sarah Barracuda

But bring Hussein down and Blago would go himself. And there is no guarantee that anything Hussein has done would mean his political demise. After all, he is a dependable leftist democrat (excuse the redundancy) and he is black. Those count as get out of jail free cards for todays highly objective, non biased, straight-arrow MSM. Hell, he won’t even prove that he is constututionally qualified to be made president and nobody has said a word.


6 posted on 12/30/2008 12:11:26 PM PST by Oldpuppymax (AGENDA OF THE LEFT EXPOSED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

Burris donated $20,000 to Blago.


7 posted on 12/30/2008 12:11:29 PM PST by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sarah Barracuda

The question is, will Blago spill those goods as he’s going down?


8 posted on 12/30/2008 12:12:04 PM PST by gieriscm (07 FFL / 02 SOT - www.extremefirepower.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: massgopguy

Wow. He’s sure getting it cheap!


9 posted on 12/30/2008 12:12:24 PM PST by BlessedBeGod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
the Supreme Court ruled that the House of Representatives could not refuse to seat Rep. Adam Clayton Powell Jr.

Not entirely correct. Congress, by majority vote (but not two-thirds) voted to exclude Powell from Congress and declare his seat vacant. Powell didn't challenge Congress' authority to do this, but rather claimed that this was tantamount to an expulsion, which requires a two-thirds vote. The Court agreed.

Assuming that the Senate could garner the two-thirds vote, it could refuse to seat him. No sweat.

10 posted on 12/30/2008 12:12:57 PM PST by Publius Valerius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
The senate has so far been pretty vocal in its position on the Blagojevich contretemps, but the governor, rat that he is, has more plain moxie than all of them put together. He has formally announced Roland Burris as the appointment, Burris is having a presser as I post. He'll pass, as everything is being done strictly according to the law. Let's see the senate throw a wrench in it. They'll have to stretch reality until their heads explode. And then they will still fail.
11 posted on 12/30/2008 12:14:05 PM PST by Seven plus One
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massgopguy

Is that all?? I could have out bid him!!!


12 posted on 12/30/2008 12:14:35 PM PST by Lurking in Kansas (Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down their level, then beat you with experience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: massgopguy
Burris donated $20,000 to Blago.

And in return his firm got 290,000 in State contracts.

Nice....

L

13 posted on 12/30/2008 12:16:27 PM PST by Lurker ("America is at that awkward stage. " Claire Wolfe, call your office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Some press conference. I can’t understand what this guy is saying!! How can one be a US Senator and not be able to put a coherent sentence together?


14 posted on 12/30/2008 12:18:12 PM PST by waverna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
I realize this is a dem situation (we certainly aren't going to get a republican), but I'm not so sure why the senate should reject him. As far as dirty Illinois politics go, I believe he's one of the least dirty. Furthermore, at age 72, he just might be a placeholder until the people can elect their own candidate.

Harry Reid might be making much ado about nothing at this point.

15 posted on 12/30/2008 12:18:28 PM PST by Texas_shutterbug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurking in Kansas

Me too, I wouldn’t mind serving in the Senate, I’d like to have a talk, yes, talk with Nancy Pelosi, Barney Frank, and Harry Reid, yep, just talk


16 posted on 12/30/2008 12:18:32 PM PST by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: waverna

Some press conference. I can’t understand what this guy is saying!! How can one be a US Senator and not be able to put a coherent sentence together?

Not being able to put a coherent sentence together makes one more then qualified to serve in the United States Senate LOL


17 posted on 12/30/2008 12:19:28 PM PST by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Seven plus One

No he threw a curve ball to Harry Reid big time. How’s Harry going to refuse a black leftist to takeover Bambi’s seat? The entire Black Caucus would be up in arms. This has after all been declared an officially black seat so Harry ole boy, I’d say your stuck with him.


18 posted on 12/30/2008 12:20:04 PM PST by marlon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Publius Valerius
Assuming that the Senate could garner the two-thirds vote, it could refuse to seat him. No sweat.

It'll never happen in this case. Justifying that vote will make them sweat, and we all know how much senators hate that smell.

19 posted on 12/30/2008 12:20:33 PM PST by Seven plus One
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
Let the people decide.


20 posted on 12/30/2008 12:24:25 PM PST by rhema ("Break the conventions; keep the commandments." -- G. K. Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson