Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Scientists doubt inventor's global cooling idea _ but what if it works?
Yahoo. ^

Posted on 12/22/2008 7:52:28 PM PST by Lorianne

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last
To: This_far

“Ace has spent three years glued to the Internet...”

He should have just stuck to porno sites.

(Maybe he DID!? Hot. Wet. Wild. Weather??)


21 posted on 12/22/2008 9:46:27 PM PST by 21twelve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
Spray gigatons of seawater into the air, mainly in the Northern Hemisphere, and let Mother Nature do the rest, he says.

Heck, all the libs need to do is coordinate all their buddies to piss into the wind at the same time. That ought to do it.

22 posted on 12/22/2008 11:35:36 PM PST by roadcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

If you had the tiniest inkling that man made CO2 increased the planet’s temperature - you mights say “Great! Let’s open Greenland to agriculture.” Which no one ever does because in their farrago of lies it is that Global Warming must always be bad. They always forget that the Vikings lived in Greenland and current day Labrador for hundreds of years during the Middle Warming period, growing crops and living in the moderate climate until it was made inhabitable by global cooling, all natural of course.

Yet my argument will assume that Global Warming is all bad and anthropogenic, from the burning of coal, oil and natural gas. Then we would need to build nuclear plants by the dozens because that is the only real way we can generate the massive amounts of power that will maintain our way of life while not producing CO2. The environmentalists are dead set against this approach. Solar and wind are jokes, an expensive hobby for rich white bored progressives who have fooled themselves into some windmill chasing crusade. Biomass would need vast plantations, or greenhouses to grow it - at incredible expense. In current technology for CO2 neutral power, nuclear is our only solution.

The temperature of the planet has been going down from 1998, and it has never gotten as warm as the Middle Warming years from all the coal we have burnt. Well, then it cannot be CO2 because the atmospheric supply is ever increasing. Now, the savants whose models were already wrong, tell us that current solar activity is masking the effects of Global Warming. I say hog wash, there is no interplanetary climate model that can predict anything, it has not been written yet, the inputs are too vast and not understood, and there is no accuracy. This is witchcraft, (but to challenge it leads to punishment by excommunication - trying standing up at a university and doubting their climate dogma - it will lead to certain exile.) Still, they have no idea what is going on with the climate. (In the 70’s they thought the Earth was cooling! Now astrophysicists claim there is Global Warming on Mars - due to increased solar activity, not CO2.)

They are using hysterical scare tactics, and 8 year old children are crying in the dark because Al Gore told them the oceans will flood Ohio if they burn electricity. These are shameful lies, and Gore needs to disclose his investments in wind mill companies before he goes on preaching. He is becoming an unhinged, fraudulent human being bent on making money any way he can.

Why are NYC and New Jersey not flooded yet? Where are these rising oceans they keep warning us about? Have we reached the so called “tipping point” where so much ice is gone that it will never come back? What lies! These climate phonies are crafty, when it gets hot, it’s Global Warming, when it gets abundantly cold, it’s Global Warming, when there are hurricanes, it’s Global Warming, when there are no hurricanes, it’s Global Warming. It is like arguing with Communists, everything always comes back to their Revolution or how they see it in their minds. Every fact is painted with the thick red paint of oppression of the workers, but now it is oppression of the Earth. The damn fact that they can never admit that nothing good can come from Global Warming should tip you off this is a fraud. It is religious dogma, just like the word “consensus” in science, which is not what I am looking for from scientists because their world is binary, not debatable. If there is debate, there is doubt and uncertainty, and I am certainly not going to spend a trillion dollars on carbon DOUBT!

The cold spell that now grips the Northern Hemisphere can make 2008 a colder year than 2007 and will hopefully bring people to their senses that there is no valid predictor. All our models are junk and we are kidding ourselves in the belief otherwise. They just don’t know and it is unlikely they will ever know. This arrogant claim of superior knowledge is a lunge for power and money and I reject it. We can wait this out, especially as the temperature drops, but I am all for nuclear power plants, let’s build them, secure our energy independence and stop producing CO2, for the fun of it if anything else.


23 posted on 12/22/2008 11:44:06 PM PST by Titus-Maximus (You can't spell Chicanery without Chicago.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne; WL-law; Genesis defender; proud_yank; FrPR; enough_idiocy; Desdemona; rdl6989; ...



Beam me to Planet Gore !

24 posted on 12/23/2008 12:45:57 AM PST by steelyourfaith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MainFrame65; ThomasThomas

Viola is a very nice instrument. I didn’t have much knowledge of them until a viola-playing high school girl joined our church choir. It works well with everything, even mariachi arrangements.

I didn’t know it caused global warming, though.


25 posted on 12/23/2008 3:50:56 AM PST by Tax-chick ("Hairless men weird me out worse than hairless cats." ~Trailerpark Badass)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Titus-Maximus

thanks for the thoughtful reply


26 posted on 12/23/2008 6:29:05 AM PST by CharlieOK1 (Don't blame me, I voted for Sarah)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
First, the sprayed droplets would transform to water vapor, a change that absorbs thermal energy near ground level; then the rising vapor would condense into sunlight-reflecting clouds and cooling rain, releasing much of the stored energy into space in the form of infrared radiation.

This would require something huge, like... like.... well, LIKE THE SUN!

Good grief, they want to spend trillions to regulate the amount of CO2, a miniscule little greenhouse gas, and spend trillions more increasing the amount of the largest greenhouse gas, water vapor.

I guess if you believe that cooling is really "a decreased rate of warming" you can force yourself to believe anything.

27 posted on 12/23/2008 9:27:33 AM PST by Unruly Human
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Titus-Maximus

farrago ... I like it


28 posted on 12/23/2008 10:10:55 AM PST by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson