Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: raybbr
It adds up if you add the money being paid to past retirees. The people working today DO NOT get over $70 in bennies and pay. The way the figure is used is a lie.

So if they just stop paying those pesky pensioners, they'll be able to turn a profit?

Bottom line - It costs the big three around $3000 more in labor costs to build a car of equivalent size, features, and quality as it does a non-union manufacturer in the US. That's why Toyota is making money and GM is not.

Only the big 3 can turn that around, and the only way to do so is through chapter 11. Otherwise, they'll be stuck with the same costs and obligations and will require monthly bailouts funded by the taxpayers. And I'm one of the taxpayers.

31 posted on 12/12/2008 5:03:00 AM PST by meyer (We are all John Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: meyer
Bottom line - It costs the big three around $3000 more in labor costs to build a car of equivalent size, features, and quality as it does a non-union manufacturer in the US. That's why Toyota is making money and GM is not.

Is it strictly labor costs? What about regulations, taxes and government interference? Why does everyone put the full onus on the labor?

46 posted on 12/12/2008 5:34:03 AM PST by raybbr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson