“I know the announcement is due tomorrow, but i want to caution folks that not all the BC eggs are in this one basket of a case.
It is entirely possible that the justices want to hear the controversy, but do not believe this is the right case to do it.
i wish i was a fly on the wall for that conference, because i suspect it was a doozy.”
I am glad to see you might consider this Donofrio case of enought merit to at least read about. Your responce to me (below) from another thread was not so soft spoken. We all are here to seek the truth and everyone is working towards that end.
FROM THE OTHER THREAD:
Report: Obama Campaign Invested in Rockers, Tattoos
Sunday, December 07, 2008 12:30:49 PM · 13 of 20
Canedawg to seekthetruth
Put a sock in it.
If you want to review my posting history about the BC cases, be my guest. it goes all the way back to analyzing the actual complaint and motion papers, as well as the decision filed in the berg case.
***********************************
AND MY REPLY WAS:
Well, I find it difficult to “put a sock in it”. The fact that that all nine SC Justices referred the Donofrio case to Conference is important. They must have felt it had merit to at least consider. The decision to hear the case fully (or not) will come out tomorrow as far as I know.
Who knows what will happen? I sure don’t but will trust in the SC decision. I am continuing to seek the truth and certainly want to be corrected if I state something that is not factual.
You mentioned the Berg case. I can see where that case may have been considered to not have merit. I really have been more focused on the Donofrio case and the great detail his research is on his web site. Tomorrow we will know if the Justices (at least four) think his case should be fully heard. :)
There’s no need to carry a dispute from one thread into another.
I replied to a post that contained a reference to a particular rock group performing at an obama rally. you told me NOT to post about that and to post about what YOU thought was important. So, i told you to put a sock in it,as i have posted plenty about the BC cases. Dont be a post fascist, thinking you can tell people what to post and not post about.
I’m done with that matter now.
It is a travesty that the Berg case was disregarded for lack of merit. We are a government of the people. A citizen should have the standing to make sure a person seeking the Presidency is eligible.