This ‘G-Man’ has no cocnept of weapons or home defense. An AR-15 would not be anyone who knows anything about rifles first choice for the ‘agenda’ he is talking about. Any long barrel 7.62 would be better.
I just hope that no one does it. They would take all our weapons away! We can wait out the next administraion. No sense giving the take-the-guns-away crowd more ammo.
Great for home defense, especially at a distance of 300 meters!
“I just hope that no one does it. They would take all our weapons away! We can wait out the next administration. No sense giving the take-the-guns-away crowd more ammo.”
Right, any attempt on the president to be, failed or otherwise, would give the Democrat leftist socialists an excuse to confiscate all firearms and ban ammo sales. The new Supreme Court appointees would rule the Second Amendment is a relic and not part of their updated reading of the Constitution.
Actually, that’s my choice - after much training, deliberation, and $. Higher capacity, lighter weight, faster cycle time, shorter barrel (indoor CQB), suppressor, low over-penetration, range suitable for anything I can see (~30m max). Key is having heavy (Mk262) fragmenting rounds.
To the author’s contention: if you need to apply it, you won’t want anything less than an AR15 (yes, bigger/heavier if you can maneuver it fast enough).
The 7.62 (scoped) is for serious outdoor use.
I don’t know if I could SEE anything at 300 meters, much less shoot it...