[Red Badger]

Here’s MY theory:

There were TWO gunmen, totally unknown to each other, totally unconnected to each other. It was a “hit” by Oswald and some other unknown that just happened to select the same place because of its location and ease of use. The other may have been CIA or whoever, but there must have been two..........

[Eric in the Ozarks]

Oswald did it, by himself. He had recently been in Cuba and Castro implanted the idea to pay back the Kennedys for trying to kill Castro. That's the unspoken reason for the embargo.

[i_dont_chat]

Here’s MY theory:

There were TWO gunmen, unknown to each other, but arranged by the mob.

One shooting from the front of JFK, Oswald shooting from the Depository. With Oswald set up to take the blame, and then the mob’s guy off’d Oswald so he couldn’t talk.

The Mob thought they were going to be able to conduct business as usual during the Kennedy administration — as a reward to them for helping get Kennedy elected. When they found out that Kennedy had other ideas, they killed him because they thought he had betrayed them.

[ctdonath2]

The only viable multiple-shooter theory I’ve heard is: one of the SS agents with JFK was equipped with the then-newfangled AR15, and being inadequately familiar with it had an accidental discharge when Oswald started firing - and AD’d right into JFK. Second shooter, no conspiracy to implement & protect, easily covered-up accident under the circumstances.

I’m still going with Oswald alone.

[Tublecane]

“but there must have been two”

Why?

[Peter Horry]

“There were TWO gunmen, totally unknown to each other, totally unconnected to each other. It was a “hit” by Oswald and some other unknown that just happened to select the same place because of its location and ease of use. The other may have been CIA or whoever, but there must have been two..........”

AAAAAh, makes perfect sense, since the 1992 movie had competing theories .... IT WAS BOTH OF THEM. That means the two parties were the Mob and a Cuban assassin.