[goldstategop]

That's not the author's argument. He says its wrong for the state to impose a particular arrangement on every one else. If gays really believe in liberty, all they have to do is propose taking the state out of licensing marriages. If they don't want to do it, then their motives will be obvious to all.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

[nufsed]

You can't be imposed upon by someone exercising a right. That's what a right is. They can do it.

There are how many million ghomosexuals and you ascribe the same motive to them all? maybe some of them just want to marry and have you mind your own business.

I know we're having an ongoing anti-gay war here, but please don't describe restricting rights as a victory for liberty.

This will be the only clause in the state constitution or any that I know of in any state which restricts the rights of people.

[nufsed]

I was responding to the self-contradictory headline of the thread.