Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

My disgust with the 'gay' rallies
WorldNetDaily ^ | November 18, 2008 | Michael Glatze

Posted on 11/18/2008 1:05:24 PM PST by scripter

Editor's note: Michael Glatze is a former homosexual-rights activist who "came out" of that lifestyle via two WND columns, "How a 'gay rights' leader became straight" and "Confessions of a former 'gay rights' leader."

As I watch 100,000 people pile together shouting, "Gay, Straight, Black, White: Marriage is a Civil Right," begging to be allowed by law to participate in a life of homosexual behavior, I am impressed by how desensitized we have come as a society.

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: exgays; homosexualagenda; prop8
There is no genetic test or procedure (experimental or otherwise) that can determine one's sexual orientation. When Michael Glatze ran YGA (Young Gay American) Magazine and claimed to be gay, the subscribers to his magazine and others believed him, as they took Glatze at his word. They believed his claim, they believed his testimony and they believed his declaration that he was gay.

But there are some people who are suddenly skeptical when anyone claims to be ex-gay. They don't believe the ex-gay claim, they don't believe the ex-gay testimony nor their declaration that they are ex-gay.

When somebody uses a certain standard to measure the credibility of what one group says, but then refuses to use the same standard to measure the credibility of what another group says—thereby ignoring the claims of the second group (ex-gays)--he should ask himself why he believes one group and not the other... This is a double standard.

1 posted on 11/18/2008 1:05:25 PM PST by scripter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 185JHP; AFA-Michigan; Abathar; Agitate; AliVeritas; Antoninus; Aquinasfan; BabaOreally; BigFinn; ...
Homosexual Agenda Ping

Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda ping list.

Be sure to click the FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search link for a list of all related articles. We don't ping you to all related articles so be sure to click the previous link to see the latest articles.

Add keywords homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list.

2 posted on 11/18/2008 1:05:56 PM PST by scripter ("You don't have a soul. You are a soul. You have a body." - C.S. Lewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scripter

Great article, thank you for finding and posting it!


3 posted on 11/18/2008 1:15:16 PM PST by little jeremiah (Leave illusion, come to the truth. Leave the darkness, come to the light.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scripter
I can't marry another man and I'm just fine with that!

If the butt-lickers want to marry a woman, like a normal person, they have the same right as everyone else.

4 posted on 11/18/2008 1:16:12 PM PST by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scripter

Be gay all you want but for the love of God stop getting in me and my kids face about it. Tolerance does not require my full endorsement along with a cheque in the form of tax breaks to boot.


5 posted on 11/18/2008 1:16:18 PM PST by iThinkBig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scripter

Would you let your daugher marry an ex-gay?


6 posted on 11/18/2008 1:17:06 PM PST by GSWarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GSWarrior
No, but I WOULD let her marry an ex-black.

That was a JOKE!!!!

7 posted on 11/18/2008 1:22:38 PM PST by informavoracious (It's after midnight, I'm FReepwalking...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: scripter

“When Michael Glatze ran YGA (Young Gay American) Magazine and claimed to be gay, the subscribers to his magazine and others believed him, as they took Glatze at his word. ...But there are some people who are suddenly skeptical when anyone claims to be ex-gay. They don’t believe the ex-gay claim... This is a double standard.”

Yes, it is a double standard. I’m not saying there should be a double standard, but I can explain why there is. I think it is because there is an assumption that the pressure against being gay is so overwhelming in society, that no one would lie about this and falsely claim that he is gay. Conversely, in view of this same societal pressure, the assumption is that a lot of people who are gay will lie and say that they are not. When you turn these societal rules around, you can get comedy out of it, like the straight clothing designer in the show Ugly Betty, who acted like he was flaming to establish credibility in his profession.


8 posted on 11/18/2008 1:22:42 PM PST by Texan Tory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: informavoracious
Somehow I don't think he would be interested in your daughter.

Garde la Foi, mes amis! Nous nous sommes les sauveurs de la République! Maintenant et Toujours!
(Keep the Faith, my friends! We are the saviors of the Republic! Now and Forever!)

LonePalm, le Républicain du verre cassé (The Broken Glass Republican)

9 posted on 11/18/2008 1:27:26 PM PST by LonePalm (Commander and Chef)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: iThinkBig
Be gay all you want but for the love of God stop getting in me and my kids face about it. Tolerance does not require my full endorsement along with a cheque in the form of tax breaks to boot.

I agree. I know someone who is a militant gay, and he and his boyfriend/partner/whatever are planning to get married in Connecticut sometime soon. For what purpose? Is there a law that prevents them from living together and doing whatever behind closed doors? Nope. Do they qualify for any benefits being "married" vs. not? Nope. Are they celibate, and await only the bonds of "marriage" to "know" each other? Nope.

It is a sham. This whole idea of "gay marriage" is a crock of hooey, invented for the sole purpose of giving organized religion (of whatever stripe) the finger, simply because organized religion failed to endorse their lifestyle as moral or permitted.

Someday, people are going to get completely sick and tired of this nonsense. However, I'm not holding my breath. Any country that could elect Mr. Obama to the Office of President is in very, very sad shape. My wife says that this is about what it must've been like in Sodom & Gomorrah, and she's probably not far off.

10 posted on 11/18/2008 1:28:13 PM PST by Ancesthntr (An ex-citizen of the Frederation dedicated to stopping the Obamination from becoming President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

Yeah, I thought an article by Michael Glatze would have an interesting perspective so thought I’d post and ping it out.


11 posted on 11/18/2008 1:32:06 PM PST by scripter ("You don't have a soul. You are a soul. You have a body." - C.S. Lewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GSWarrior

I would leave that up to my daughter.


12 posted on 11/18/2008 1:33:48 PM PST by scripter ("You don't have a soul. You are a soul. You have a body." - C.S. Lewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Texan Tory

Indeed. It’s a complicated issue plus there’s so much misinformation out there. My comment was to get people thinking and talking about the growing ex-gay population.


13 posted on 11/18/2008 1:37:03 PM PST by scripter ("You don't have a soul. You are a soul. You have a body." - C.S. Lewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: scripter

Bttt


14 posted on 11/18/2008 2:58:31 PM PST by DirtyHarryY2K (Don't blame Texas.. No more RINO's or Mavericks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LonePalm

LMAO!


15 posted on 11/18/2008 3:16:44 PM PST by DirtyHarryY2K (Don't blame Texas.. No more RINO's or Mavericks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: GSWarrior

I guess it would depend if my daughter had a knack for decorating; it could be a real plus.


16 posted on 11/18/2008 3:24:14 PM PST by MayflowerMadam (We have elected a man ... who has never run so much as a Dairy Queen (Dollard post))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: scripter

With due deference to The SCOTUS, there can be no right to marry. I have no “right” to marry unless I also have authority to force some other human being into a union that they object to.

Now, if there’s some guy so weak in so many ways that it’s TRULY said, “No one will marry him.” does he have a “right” to marry?

One can only respond, “IF (read if)....he can find someone....yada, yada, yada.”

By using the word “if”, we have just made it conditional on what someone ELSE does. I suspect many have gone through life desiring to be married but unable to find a willing partner.

Anyone think the government should assign them, so these poor souls get to exercise their “right”?


17 posted on 11/19/2008 12:28:49 AM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain, Pro Deo et Patria)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ancesthntr

Not quite like Soddom and Gomorrah if two entire cities had less then 10 righteous people. America has millions of God fearing people that help it’s fellow man. The earth will go through a global correction, through world war. The U.S. will also be corrected and will undergo pain that could have been minimized if we had stayed true to our former national relationship with Christ. It’s mostly reap what you sow at play.


18 posted on 11/20/2008 1:11:22 PM PST by iThinkBig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson