Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Al Franken's vote-tally appeal rebuffed
Star Tribune ^

Posted on 11/17/2008 10:00:37 PM PST by Chet 99

DFLer Al Franken asked Monday to have rejected absentee ballots be considered in the U.S. Senate election results that are to be certified today by a state board, a move later blunted by an attorney general's opinion that the issue should be left to the courts.

The eleventh-hour maneuvering occurred as the five-member state Canvassing Board prepared to meet at 1 p.m. today in St. Paul to review results showing Republican Sen. Norm Coleman with a lead of 215 votes out of more than 2.9 million cast.

That margin includes the canvassed results submitted by Minnesota's 87 counties, plus an additional nine votes in Coleman's favor that emerged from a post-election audit conducted in a sampling of about 200 precincts to check the accuracy of voting machines.

(Excerpt) Read more at startribune.com ...


TOPICS: US: Minnesota
KEYWORDS: coleman; franken; mn2008
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

1 posted on 11/17/2008 10:00:37 PM PST by Chet 99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Chet 99

Coleman is trading at 38 on intrade, and he is an underdog by most estimates.
It will take a minor miracle for him to win this one, and I don’t even remember when was last time we won a close Senate race.


2 posted on 11/17/2008 10:05:08 PM PST by ubaldus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chet 99

If Coleman hangs on, it’ll be sweet.

Not because I’m a fan of Norm, but rather because the crestfallen look on Frankenidiot’s face would make my year.


3 posted on 11/17/2008 10:06:28 PM PST by DemforBush (Millions of conservatives have got your back, Sarah!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chet 99

Al Franken....geez, where’s this country going!?


4 posted on 11/17/2008 10:06:31 PM PST by Rick_Michael (Have no fear "Senator Government" is here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rick_Michael

I have actually seen someone on another message board post that Al Franken is brilliant. No, this was not sarcasm.


5 posted on 11/17/2008 10:08:57 PM PST by randomhero97 ("First you want to kill me, now you want to kiss me. Blow!" - Ash)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Rick_Michael; Chet 99
Al Franken....geez, where’s this country going!?

Franken won some of Ben Stein's money for this race. How about this ticket in 8 years?


Franken/Stein 2016!

6 posted on 11/17/2008 10:09:26 PM PST by Paleo Conservative (Drill Here. Drill Now. Pay Less.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Chet 99

What’s with Minnesota? I know that the DFL party has always been leftist, even heavily infiltrated by the Communist Party USA in the 40’s-50’s, but this is ridiculous.

First the state becomes “Sharia-central” and now it is “fraud Franken friendly.”

Too much cold affecting the brains up there, or no brains?


7 posted on 11/17/2008 10:09:44 PM PST by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ubaldus

The vote count hardly matters at this point. If Franken comes short, the Democrat senate will count all the bogus ballots and then seat Franken. The Democrats have a history of ignoring close election results when they’ve had the power to do so.


8 posted on 11/17/2008 10:10:08 PM PST by Chet 99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Chet 99

” If Franken comes short, the Democrat senate will count all the bogus ballots and then seat Franken. “

It wouldn’t be up to them. It would be the state that would have to certify the winner.


9 posted on 11/17/2008 10:15:49 PM PST by DemonDeac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Chet 99
I remember when Al Franken was on "Celebrity Jeopardy" some years ago. He somehow finagled a win for his "charity." I remember thinking at the time: this guy is a cheater.

Anyway, Mr. Franken couldn't explain what his "charity" was, but it was some ultra-liberal cause with a nice sounding name.

10 posted on 11/17/2008 10:17:05 PM PST by Jess Kitting
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DemonDeac

Wrong.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis_Wyman

He was not a candidate for reelection, but was a candidate in 1974 for the United States Senate for the six-year term commencing January 3, 1975. He was certified as elected by the State of New Hampshire by a razor-thin two-vote margin over his opponent, John A. Durkin, and was subsequently appointed on December 31, 1974 to fill the vacancy caused by the resignation of Norris Cotton for the term ending January 3, 1975, and served until that date. Due to the contested and extremely close election of November 5, 1974, the United States Senate declared the seat vacant as of August 8, 1975. Wyman was unsuccessful in a special September election to fill the vacancy, losing to Durkin.


11 posted on 11/17/2008 10:17:16 PM PST by Chet 99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Chet 99

After taking a look at HowObamaWonTheElection.com, I am convinced there is a major part of the electorate that is, to be blunt, stupid, ignorant, and uninformed. This would apply to anyone who voted for Franken. Does not bode well for our country.


12 posted on 11/17/2008 10:19:04 PM PST by DennisR (Look around - God gives countless, indisputable clues that He does, indeed, exist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DemonDeac
"It wouldn’t be up to them. It would be the state that would have to certify the winner.

Actually, I think in the last analysis, the Senate has the actual authority to seat whom they wish. It isn't used very much. I could be wrong, though.

13 posted on 11/17/2008 10:19:39 PM PST by Irene Adler (')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: DemonDeac

http://www.c-span.org/questions/weekly93.asp

Prior to the Dornan v. Sanchez contest, the House last considered a contested election in 1985: McIntyre v. McCloskey in the 8th district of Indiana. While the State of Indiana certified the Republican, McIntyre, as the winner of the election, the House voted to seat the Democratic challenger, Frank McCloskey. A House-ordered recount gave McCloskey a 4-vote margin of victory.


14 posted on 11/17/2008 10:20:32 PM PST by Chet 99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Irene Adler

See posts 11 and 14. The Dems have overturned certified election results at least twice.


15 posted on 11/17/2008 10:21:17 PM PST by Chet 99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

16 posted on 11/17/2008 10:28:16 PM PST by egannacht
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: DennisR

After taking a look at HowObamaWonTheElection.com, I am convinced there is a major part of the electorate that is, to be blunt, stupid, ignorant, and uninformed. This would apply to anyone who voted for Franken. Does not bode well for our country.

The educational system and the media were dumbed and taken over down by Obama’s Marxist “educator” and “reeducator” friends like Bill Ayers. When cameo appearances in skit of Saturday Night Live becomes a required stop for presidential candidates, we know that reality chekcing is long since gone from the electoral process.


17 posted on 11/17/2008 11:11:05 PM PST by Seeing More Clearly Now (Only in America - no valid ID needed to vote or to run for president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Chet 99; DemonDeac
Democrats and liberals steal elections

The GOP lets them

18 posted on 11/17/2008 11:46:28 PM PST by Syncro (Tagline: optional, printed after your name on post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Rick_Michael
Al Franken....geez, where’s this country going!?

Serious Regression taking place.

This drooling infant with a wet diaper is about to take an honored seat in the United States Senate.

Can it get much worse?


19 posted on 11/18/2008 1:18:24 AM PST by henbane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: henbane
"This drooling infant with a wet diaper is about to take an honored seat in the United States Senate."

Sure - they can seat him right next to the other drooling, diaper-wearing loony-leftist members Arlen (Scottish Law) Specter and Robert (KKK) Byrd....

20 posted on 11/18/2008 4:02:04 AM PST by Psalm 73 ("Gentlemen, you can't fight in here - this is the War Room".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson