Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jindal: Never Vetted for VP
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/thefix/2008/11/jindal_never_vetted.html?nav=rss_blog ^ | Chris Silliza

Posted on 11/10/2008 11:32:34 AM PST by Def Conservative

Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal, who has emerged as one of the hottest names in national Republican circles since John McCain's defeat last week, was never vetted as a vice presidential pick, according to sources close to the Pelican State chief executive.

Jindal was approached by McCain forces to gauge his interest in the vice presidency and told them he was not interested in being vetted due to his desire to continue on with his current job, to which he was elected just one year ago.

While the official reason that Jindal took his name out of contention was his lack of a desire to leave the Louisiana governorship, there was also real trepidation within his political inner circle that Jindal might wind up as the pick -- McCain was attracted to his comprehensive health-care knowledge -- and be caught up in what they believed to be a less-than-stellar campaign that could pin a loss on Jindal without much ability to change or control the direction of the contest

(Excerpt) Read more at voices.washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Louisiana
KEYWORDS: 2008veep; bobbyjindal; electionpresident; jindal; mccain; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last
To: Def Conservative

Even if he wanted to run as VP he could not have served as Pres if McCain dropped dead on Jan 31, 09, he is too young. 2012 is a different story.


21 posted on 11/10/2008 11:47:32 AM PST by biff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

I agree.


22 posted on 11/10/2008 11:49:14 AM PST by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: smith288

Funny thing is, the same thing happened to me yesterday. A friend—Obama supporter—told me she likes Jindal because he’s moderate. I didn’t try and persuade her otherwise.

Maybe Jindal can fool the public like Obama did.


23 posted on 11/10/2008 11:51:03 AM PST by Def Conservative (Palin, Jindal, Pence, Sanford, Steele= the new GOP...out with the old)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: biff

Jindal is 37; Constitution requires 35. He’s not too young.


24 posted on 11/10/2008 11:51:03 AM PST by Campion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Def Conservative

Is he willing to release his birth certificate? Just saying...


25 posted on 11/10/2008 11:51:57 AM PST by Hatteras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
True, instead the vetted the one who had 20 months.

Yes, but she had executive experince going back further than that. And though people might scoff at being a mayor or agency commissioner, executive experience at any level is valuable compared to being in the legislature where few people lead and the buck is easy to pass. Of course, Jindal has that too, having run a state agency and a hospital system before he went for elected office.

Palin's the only reason this wasn't a 15 point blowout. That takes nothing away from Jindal as far as I'm concerned; I hope he whips Louisiana into shape and then makes it to the White House sometime soon. If I were McCain I never would have looked at him simply because the opportunity in LA is something we might get once in 20 or 30 years, and he may be the only guy in the state who can take care of it.

26 posted on 11/10/2008 11:54:42 AM PST by Mr. Silverback (It's time to turn about, like Sheridan at Cedar Creek. Let's punch them out of their boots!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback

27 posted on 11/10/2008 11:57:51 AM PST by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Def Conservative

You can bet the house that the MSM will vet him just like they did Sarah (and didn’t vet Obama).


28 posted on 11/10/2008 11:58:11 AM PST by willk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Def Conservative

You can bet the house that the MSM will vet him just like they did Sarah (and didn’t vet Obama).


29 posted on 11/10/2008 11:58:13 AM PST by willk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Def Conservative

Jindal played it smart to stay away from McCain. I also think, however, that Palin played it smart by taking the gig. There is no way given her gender and the remoteness of
Alaska that she could have ever generated this much buzz on her own. She became a household name at no cost to her.

She was probably partly happy that she last b/c she knew that a McLame presidency would tarnish her forever. She can remake herself in 4 years.


30 posted on 11/10/2008 11:58:56 AM PST by Lou Budvis (Demoralize his base, Blame him for everything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ghost of Philip Marlowe
Well, I won't flame you, but I can't agree completely. He's never had to look down the barrels of an international crisis, but he's got a ton of executive experience (and a good record) in a difficult field.

I think we'll know by primary time if he' the guy...either to be the top of the ticket or go in as Palin's veep. And in general I agree with you: Caution is advised with Jindal or ANY name that's being shopped around four years before the next primary.

31 posted on 11/10/2008 11:59:31 AM PST by Mr. Silverback (It's time to turn about, like Sheridan at Cedar Creek. Let's punch them out of their boots!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Def Conservative

Bobby’s a good man, but he now has an image that may be a bit too geekish and wonkish.

If he wants support from AH-nold and other “he-man” types, I guess he’d better hire a personal trainer, lift some weights, learn to do squats, and put a little meat on those thin arms and legs!

(Or would he then lose support from the single women and the other “sensitive” folks who voted for the Big 0?)


32 posted on 11/10/2008 12:00:51 PM PST by Hawthorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Def Conservative

Smart man. This election was a boondoggle, he needed to stay out of it.


33 posted on 11/10/2008 12:01:09 PM PST by Cathy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: biff

No, he’s 37 now, he would have been able to serve. The Constitutional age requirement is 35.


34 posted on 11/10/2008 12:01:09 PM PST by Mr. Silverback (It's time to turn about, like Sheridan at Cedar Creek. Let's punch them out of their boots!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Def Conservative

Jindal should run in 2016. Why? Hussein’s loyal cult will likely disintegrate for the most part, and dumb Americans will want to elect another non-white guy just to go along with the trend. It will be a win for sure.


35 posted on 11/10/2008 12:01:29 PM PST by couchpotatoxxx12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: deport

It’s what he does on those jobs that counts. He is an efficiency genius who instinctively knows how to streamline things down to the bare bones while providing more services in return. He is solutions/results oriented.


36 posted on 11/10/2008 12:02:18 PM PST by CajunConservative (1.20.13 - The End of an Error)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Dang straight!

Mike Ramirez should just get the Pulitzer for catooning every year until he retires.


37 posted on 11/10/2008 12:02:18 PM PST by Mr. Silverback (It's time to turn about, like Sheridan at Cedar Creek. Let's punch them out of their boots!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Campion

Me bad.


38 posted on 11/10/2008 12:02:30 PM PST by biff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback

Sarah added 13 points to the total. That is the best estimate that I have seen.


39 posted on 11/10/2008 12:05:09 PM PST by texmexis best
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Def Conservative

My neighbor wasn’t either.


40 posted on 11/10/2008 12:06:32 PM PST by org.whodat ( "the Whipped Dog Party" , what was formally the republicans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson